LogFAQs > #877260704

Which has any bearing because...?

I'm just pointing out how much he cares about money. He certainly cares about it more than any real religion.

Quit riding Trump's ass by knocking him over the silliest, most unfounded accusations any chance you get so I can stop correcting your stupid, wrong-headed beliefs.

Every single accusation I make is true and I usually post sources to back it up. You pretty much never back up any of your claims. I'm still waiting on that source from you proving that coal is cheaper and cleaner than other energy sources.

The claim about him not caring about the poor is unfounded, as he defended parts of the ACA during the primaries and outright attacked Cruz for wanting to roll back entitlements too far. Your claim is another hyperbolic two minutes hate: If you don't shout loudly enough for certain things, you guys accuse them of being the enemy

The primaries are over. The campaign is over. The election is over. He's now the President. It doesn't matter what he said before; it only matters what he says and does now. And now, when he was promoting the new health care bill he tried getting the Freedom Caucus to his side by stripping practically everything from insurance including emergency services. And now he says he's going to withhold insurance payments from the poor in order to get Democrats to overturn the ACA. So don't even give me that fucking garbage about how he defended the ACA or cares about the poor.

As for the charity claims, they came from WaPo (which was noted even in the outlets who parroted the claims), a news outlet owned by Clinton ally and Amazon owner Jeff Bezos who has used it as a superpac to attack Hillary's enemies, be it Sanders or Trump, with largely unfounded claims. WaPo's reporting is no better than the National Enquirer or Rolling Stone.

The Washington Post has won multiple Pulitzer Prizes for reporting. Just because they report on things you don't like doesn't make them fake news.
---

#welchingalldayerrday