LogFAQs > #876705628

CruelBuffalo posted...

We can also sit back and let children get attacked by chemical weapons.

It seems to be that there are options other than "do nothing" (which isn't exactly what we were doing before) and "fire the missiles." Increased intake of refugees, for one.

Also, the "must do something" crowd only ever seems to show up when that something is "blow stuff up." There are children starving in Yemen as a result of a Saudi-led war we've backed at every step. There's a famine in Somalia (another country we're bombing.)

At the end of the day, I've yet to see an instance where U.S. "humanitarian intervention" has brought about the positive results. I'm extra skeptical about intervention as done by an idiot TV game show host and his son-in-law.
---

an aspirin the size of the sun.