LogFAQs > #986902176

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Supreme Court of Canada rules 1 year min. for CP charges unconstitutional
Snip-N-Snails 11/01/25 12:32:01 AM #48:	RasterGraphic posted... I think that might be a fundamental disagreement between us. It definitely is CP possession, at least on an objective level. I feel like declaring that the image isn't CP due to the age of the possessor might open up a bigger can of worms. At the very least It's still something that needs to be dealt with due to the risk of it getting leaked. Basing it on intent and context shouldn't be too big a can of worms. Again, it's how the various forms of homicide work. Pornography itself is based on intent and not just any nude picture. --- #BLM <cite>Snip-N-Snails posted [p:986902176] in Supreme Co... [t:81063521]...</cite> <quote>RasterGraphic posted... </cite><quote>I think that might be a fundamental disagreement between us. It definitely is CP possession, at least on an objective level.I feel like declaring that the image isn't CP due to the age of the possessor might open up a bigger can of worms. At the very least It's still something that needs to be dealt with due to the risk of it getting leaked.</quote>Basing it on intent and context shouldn't be too big a can of worms. Again, it's how the various forms of homicide work. Pornography itself is based on intent and not just any nude picture. --- #BLM</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1