LogFAQs > #985975963

Proto_Spark posted...

tbf, this has already been their defence. IIRC its WWE's official defense as well.

And I mean, right out of the invasion, it would make sense that was at least, the original plan. However, once the racial undertones and stuff like this promo took the forefront, WWE should have changed direction.

Generally, WWE has been fairly good in the "if the heel crosses the line, they do have to lose" category at least. Though that also makes this one stand out much more.

Its not rare in Pro Wrestling to have the bad guy be racist/sexist/whatever, but general basic storytelling sort of means if your bad guy does something that bad, they do have to lose the feud, and the good guy gets the well-deserved win. There are a couple times this hasn't been the case, and its always awful when they make that move.

Think about what you're saying for 3 seconds.

If the good guy had to win the feud everytime the bad guy said something bad, the bad guy would literally never win any feud ever.

Remember that time HBK threw Marty Janetty through a glass window and then never won a match again because that's a horrible thing to do and it would be bad if a bad person won?

You guys are being ridiculous because Triple H is the boss now. It's like those idiots who got mad at the kid who played Joffrey