LogFAQs > #985948761

Board_hunter567 posted...

Abandon voters were ultimately inconsequential or limited to coastal states that still went overwhelming blue anyway. Like, that Twitter account has less then 10k followers. Am I supposed to believe they had any effect on the election? I don't care what they do or think because if they never existed Harris would still have lost.

But they still exist though, right? If I were to account for all the reasons why Harris lost they'd still make the list though, wouldn't they? And out of all of the people comprised of the demographics that contributed to why Harris lost, the nationally insignificant ones just so happen to be the overwhelmingly largest representative of people that post on CE to this day, aren't they? And since I can't speak to a statistic but I can speak to a person then why wouldn't I talk shit about those people in a forum where they can see the criticism?

Damn man, I'm still just sitting here confused when statistics ever become an acceptable way to avoid personal accountability. It's so weird that people here insist on that shit lol. You'd think our abandon voters would be super happy to take credit for the shit they spent over a year advocating for. If I spent all of my time rooting against a politician and their party and they lost I'd be shouting that shit up and down and wouldn't let people forget it yet our abandon voters just stay hiding like cowards lol.