LogFAQs > #985948441

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	How many of Glitchwave's top 100 games of the quarter century have you played?
OrangeCrush980 07/31/25 1:30:34 PM #69:	Paratroopa1 posted... Painful to see #32 Thousand-Year Door miss the list because it's one spot below Galaxy, lol I can respect the whole series limitation to induce more variety thing, but I really think Mario and Zelda are such prolific franchises that limiting them to just one entry creates some really odd effects - if I were going to make a top 100 list of the best games of the last 25 years it would basically be malpractice to not include at least 2-3 Mario and Zelda games and I don't care what the Nintendo haters have to say about it I think that 1 per series is a good limit generally speaking, though the actual execution could've used more nuance. Like I think that Mario platformers and Mario RPGs are different enough that it can make sense to have both Galaxy and TTYD. And then on the other side of things, we shouldn't get all 4 of Dark Souls, Bloodborne, Sekiro, and Elden Ring since it's clear that they're all part of the same "meta-series". Something like a soft limit of 1 and a hard limit of 2 for edge cases like those might be a good compromise. --- "Foolishness, Dante. Foolishness... Might controls everything. And without strength, you cannot protect anything. Let alone yourself." - Vergil, DMC3 <cite>OrangeCrush980 posted [p:985948441] in How many o... [t:81019310]...</cite> <quote>Paratroopa1 posted... </cite><quote>Painful to see #32 Thousand-Year Door miss the list because it's one spot below Galaxy, lolI can respect the whole series limitation to induce more variety thing, but I really think Mario and Zelda are such prolific franchises that limiting them to just one entry creates some really odd effects - if I were going to make a top 100 list of the best games of the last 25 years it would basically be malpractice to not include at least 2-3 Mario and Zelda games and I don't care what the Nintendo haters have to say about it</quote>I think that 1 per series is a good limit generally speaking, though the actual execution could've used more nuance. Like I think that Mario platformers and Mario RPGs are different enough that it can make sense to have both Galaxy and TTYD. And then on the other side of things, we shouldn't get all 4 of Dark Souls, Bloodborne, Sekiro, and Elden Ring since it's clear that they're all part of the same "meta-series". Something like a soft limit of 1 and a hard limit of 2 for edge cases like those might be a good compromise. --- "Foolishness, Dante. Foolishness... Might controls everything. And without strength, you cannot protect anything. Let alone yourself."- Vergil, DMC3</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1