LogFAQs > #985793055

Rika_Furude posted...

This always seems like the weirdest excuse, ngl

like, if theres some sort of furry controversy, I am extremely skeptical if even one single individual anywhere in the world thought damn you Mastercard for allowing furries to purchase that

That really is how some random people think, lol. Its stupid yeah. Either that, or just flat out guilty by association. "This *insert degenerate thing here* wouldn't have happened if mastercard and visa allowed the sale to go through. Blood is on their hands, or they are racist/sexist/etc. for allowing this thing to happen. They support *insert thing here* because they did nothing!". Etc.

Its similar to how nintendo backs away from the smash community every time some sort of controversy is blowing up on social media. Like of course these companies isn't at fault for the kind of shit the worst degenerates get up to, but then its a fact that some people really will try to sue for just about anything and so the company just does not want to deal with all that.

I see that brief list of games posted with post #83 and it could be for money chargeback reasons, but imo is more than likely a mastercard does not want to be anywhere near the same universe to being associated with all those games with incest and rape in the game's name kind of thing.