LogFAQs > #980249207

Town
Blade, Ben, Chang, FD, Kirby

Townish
Sbell: Started that whole discussion about 'leaving Knightz alone since he was already dead', which does not read as scum-town

Ctes: Wallz accused him of being scummoned. Seems odd to say about a scum mate, and Wallz really wanted Ctes to show up too.
That started a whole argument which does not feel like scum-scum to me. However Ctes loses some points due to unvoting Wallz very quickly after voting him.

MI: Disliked Wallz post as well, tho he was late to the party.
MI also paired Wallz' votes with FD and promised to reread FD, but then later promised to reread Wallz again to say he likes him more than he thougt.
He also thought Wallz was a diversion from scum, tho he became the next diversion ironically. Thats the best thing going for him really.

Ulti: I cant really see a scumpartner make the 'why didnt Wallz pursue me right away' attack. That said the two seemed awfully chummy later on despite that and Ulti voted MI at the end of the day as well.

Taco/Mzero: Stayed hands off from Wall, but his taunter claim felt genuine. Mzero needs to step up however.

Already Inside the PoE:

IGCD: I really dont remember what he has going for him outside of maybe some things Knightz said.

Corrik: Has contributed little besides tunneling Blade.

Red: Has also contributed little

Peaf: The big one to me. Topic1 He only commented on Wallz to defend him from Ulti, had no comments about Ben and Blade's attacks. He also likes Wallz more than other lynch leaders halfway during day1
Peaf did not want to lynch Wallz (Or FD) but to his credit he did want to lynch Knightz. However, he put Kirby and Ben high up on his target list as well.
Later that day he defended Wall more, but Wall did not seem to even notice (unlike with Lopens defense of Wall). And he was one of the votes on MI. That said he is at least more active and has given some good insights sometimes. But I cannot say he's done enough.