LogFAQs > #980036324

Even if we believe everything Rogers says, he still implicates O.J. Simpson in the murder. I havent seen the info in a long time, but my recollection is that his account is that O.J. hired him to break into Nicoles house to steal stuff he gave her when they were married. O.J. then heavily implied (Rodgers might have even said ordered) that he would have to kill the bitch during the burglary.

There is a lot to unpack about the trial and the impact and such. But treating the confession of Rogers as some kind of exoneration for Simpson is ridiculous. Even if it can be trusted.

And I know tHe point TC is making about perhaps the prosecution was pursuing the wrong theory. But I think there needs to be more context here than: Someone else confessed. Yeah. Someone confessed to being hired by O.J. to burglarize and hurt his wife.