LogFAQs > #979881635

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Was Solaris the most technically impressive game for the Atari 2600?
FortuneCookie 04/12/24 11:35:27 PM #6:	archizzy posted... All I can say is going from Atari 2600 to when NES came out was mind blowing. Like sure there was some moderate improvement inbetween like with ColecoVision but it was a smaller difference. Jumping to NES was jaw dropping and I swore it was like alien tech that wasn't possible. People laugh now and would make fun of that but seriously moving from Atari 2600 to NES was a leap I will never forget and in my life I have never had a generational change that impressed me as much. As someone who wasn't around, the Atari 5200 had some good graphics for its time. It's a shame about that controller. I wonder how the history books might've been rewritten if Atari had simply figured out the proper way to make a gaming controller with more than one button and a joystick. <cite>FortuneCookie posted [p:979881635] in Was Solari... [t:80745747]...</cite> <quote>archizzy posted... </cite><quote>All I can say is going from Atari 2600 to when NES came out was mind blowing. Like sure there was some moderate improvement inbetween like with ColecoVision but it was a smaller difference.Jumping to NES was jaw dropping and I swore it was like alien tech that wasn't possible. People laugh now and would make fun of that but seriously moving from Atari 2600 to NES was a leap I will never forget and in my life I have never had a generational change that impressed me as much.</quote>As someone who wasn't around, the Atari 5200 had some good graphics for its time. It's a shame about that controller. I wonder how the history books might've been rewritten if Atari had simply figured out the proper way to make a gaming controller with more than one button and a joystick.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1