LogFAQs > #979710291

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Godzilla x Kong (Minor Spoilers)
FortuneCookie 04/03/24 12:45:27 PM #13:	hop918 posted... Son of Kong released in the 1930s, they were absolutely drawing from that, much like the other movies in this universe have drawn from older movies of the monsters. Yeah, there's a mythology nod. But they're definitely following the trend. hop918 posted... They in no way made Kong look bad in this movie. Yeah, bad ass monsters are always getting dental surgery performed with dated tunes playing in the background. The rules are pretty simple: if it's silly or cute, it goes to Kong. If it's badass: it goes to Godzilla. I get that there needs to be contrast so that it isn't just mammal monster and reptile monster, but they know what they're doing. <cite>FortuneCookie posted [p:979710291] in Godzilla x... [t:80734013]...</cite> <quote>hop918 posted... </cite><quote>Son of Kong released in the 1930s, they were absolutely drawing from that, much like the other movies in this universe have drawn from older movies of the monsters.</quote>Yeah, there's a mythology nod. But they're definitely following the trend.hop918 posted... </cite><quote>They in no way made Kong look bad in this movie.</quote>Yeah, bad ass monsters are always getting dental surgery performed with dated tunes playing in the background.The rules are pretty simple: if it's silly or cute, it goes to Kong. If it's badass: it goes to Godzilla. I get that there needs to be contrast so that it isn't just mammal monster and reptile monster, but they know what they're doing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1