LogFAQs > #979588577

GranAures posted...

Or absolute falsehoods,

Not against the TOS.
GranAures posted...

being civil does not make those "opinions" acceptable.

Having an opinion the board doesn't find acceptable is also not against the rules. And when talking politics, there isn't a "Right" answer.

But the mods here will try to twist everything to interpret what you said until they can call it "trolling."

However, then you have things against the rules like what I pointed out in post #153 and nothing has happened. And I pointed it out directly below a moderator in post #151 said it's against the rules.

Baphometa posted...

"you're a so-and-so," where we're going to make a reasonable assumption that you're trying to insult someone. So not all insults are going to be hit for abusive, they might fall under trolling if anything, and minor ones would probably net you a NWD or NKL without history.

TBF probably landed on the last part of what they said, but I still don't really understand that either. Why would someone openly insulting someone else not at least have the post deleted? If there's an insult out there, I'd think it'd be better to delete it. What is the line between what gets deleted or not if it's not an actual insult a person has to look at.