LogFAQs > #979433574

Villain_S_Fiend posted...

That's what every sect of religion has to do with every ancient religious text. In fact, that's exactly why there are differing sects of religion.

So you're arguing that this is the correct way to do things then? That ash is correct by assuming the tactics of religion to make her points? Kinda a self own.

Correct.

That's the entirety of the Bible.

Source?

Doesn't exist. Every statement attributed to God was written by humans as flawed and unreliable as anyone.

Then why should ash's be considered reliable?

You can't say "we can't rely on the bibles description of God to discuss God's characteristics, so instead we should rely on asherlees version and discuss that one"

Thats contradictory.