LogFAQs > #979098002

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Trump Trials General Part 9
ThePieReborn 02/28/24 5:19:15 PM #201:	Starks posted... They just want some finality and put it in writing. At the same time though, they could have told Trump to fuck off with a shadow docket ruling. I wouldn't expect the oral arguments to be fun for Trump or his lawyers. This is where I'm at. I don't think this is something that the Court would want to not thoroughly address. I'd love to say "dismantle" instead of "address," but an affirmance is not carved in stone despite all historical traditions indicating otherwise. --- Party leader, passive-aggressive doormat, pasta eater extraordinaire! <cite>ThePieReborn posted [p:979098002] in Trump Tria... [t:80706332]...</cite> <quote>Starks posted... </cite><quote>They just want some finality and put it in writing. At the same time though, they could have told Trump to fuck off with a shadow docket ruling.I wouldn't expect the oral arguments to be fun for Trump or his lawyers.</quote>This is where I'm at. I don't think this is something that the Court would want to not thoroughly address. I'd love to say "dismantle" instead of "address," but an affirmance is not carved in stone despite all historical traditions indicating otherwise. --- Party leader, passive-aggressive doormat, pasta eater extraordinaire!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1