LogFAQs > #979049949

willythemailboy posted...

Proving malice is too far, because motivation is nearly impossible. Proving the accusation fictitious is a reasonable standard to set. That isn't the accuser not being able to prove the accusation true, but the accused being able to prove that the alleged event did not and could not have happened.

Two cases I'm personally familiar with: one was a guy accused of assaulting a woman in a Walmart break room. The entire incident was recorded on security cameras from multiple angles and did not in any way resemble the attack she alleged. The second was a guy being accused by his ex of constantly harassing, stalking, and assaulting her. He'd been accused so many times, each time with absolutely no proof, that he requested the police put an ankle monitor on him so he could prove where he was when the inevitable next accusation took place. Within a week she's accused him of raping her while his monitor and other evidence proved he'd been more than a hundred miles away.

And cases like this, the accusers 100% should've been put in prison.
I don't know how the fuck anyone thinks these aren't blatant crimes.
And there's hard evidence to prove it was lies.