LogFAQs > #978976477

Insomnia sucks.

SecretBase posted...

Conservative philosophy holds that charitable functions should be managed by the private sector.

It's hypocritical to push religious anti-choice philosophy like abortion bans yet not push the actually good anti-greed and charity philosophy into law.

Either "Pay on to Caesar that which is Caesar's. Pay on to God that which is God's" means pay your taxes and keep religion separate from law or theocracy should be law. You don't get to keep the crapabortion laws without the good social safety nets.

Antiyonder posted...

Yeah and that's why I suggested the idea that any voting on abortion rights should entail that voting against it means agreeing to support numerous children that will be neglected/abandoned and/or abuse.

Maybe some would do so, but the majority of people beforehand claiming their stance on the issue is for positive reasons? They will back down if the choice means having to contribute financially.

I don't know. I feel like it's for the same reason people are down on LGBTQ+ rights. Basically vain people wanting to do something for recognition, well as long as it's not a risk (physical or financial).

Foster care is a social safety net that already comes out of their pockets through taxes. It is completely legal to abandon infants anonymously at government buildings in an obvious place.