LogFAQs > #978976444

Dark_Arbron posted...

And only affordable by the rich.
And only to the in-group (straight white Christian men in this case).

Yeah and that's why I suggested the idea that any voting on abortion rights should entail that voting against it means agreeing to support numerous children that will be neglected/abandoned and/or abuse.

Maybe some would do so, but the majority of people beforehand claiming their stance on the issue is for positive reasons? They will back down if the choice means having to contribute financially.

I don't know. I feel like it's for the same reason people are down on LGBTQ+ rights. Basically vain people wanting to do something for recognition, well as long as it's not a risk (physical or financial).