LogFAQs > #978840264

Dungeater posted...

So to be clear, if you take ten people, make the details of their life and upbringing exactly the same, down to the level of care, meals, etc. everything

a couple of those people will still be inclined to be better at thing X than the rest of the group?

To extrapolate on what I mean by the definition of natural talent being murky, following this example:
Life template A: Person 1 & 2 excel at the talent while everyone else is mediocre

Meanwhile a Life template B that is completely tweaked and used on the same 10 people: Person 4, 5, 6 and 7 are the best and everyone else fails to keep up the same way.

Which ones were truly natural talents? Just because person 1-2 develop better under one method and 4-7 develop better a different way, are either really "naturally" more talented than the others? Was template A really a better way to be raised if it produces fewer talented people?