LogFAQs > #978807833

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Should religion alone really be deemed valid for outlawing something,
Antiyonder 02/12/24 5:00:29 PM #11:	ai123 posted... I don't have the edgelord smug disdain for people of faith that you often see. But I do believe religion should be kept out of politics and policy. CyborgSage00x0 posted... Mostly because it's bullshit. Religious beliefs can be whatever people say they are, so it opens the door for them to be "against" any and everything. It's not even a slippery slope, but a lube-coated slide into the abyss. While claiming such would happen if gay marriages for example were 100% legal. Plus the false equivalent with non-consentual situations. And it also infers there to be no actual problem with gay marriage (which is true at least), so the attempt at rejection is false equivalency. --- Amalgam Universe resident Born in 82. <cite>Antiyonder posted [p:978807833] in Should rel... [t:80695072]...</cite> <quote>ai123 posted... </cite><quote>I don't have the edgelord smug disdain for people of faith that you often see. But I do believe religion should be kept out of politics and policy.</quote>CyborgSage00x0 posted... </cite><quote>Mostly because it's bullshit. Religious beliefs can be whatever people say they are, so it opens the door for them to be "against" any and everything. It's not even a slippery slope, but a lube-coated slide into the abyss.</quote>While claiming such would happen if gay marriages for example were 100% legal. Plus the false equivalent with non-consentual situations.And it also infers there to be no actual problem with gay marriage (which is true at least), so the attempt at rejection is false equivalency. --- Amalgam Universe resident Born in 82.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1