LogFAQs > #978748718

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Shaq says to never open up to a woman
GiftedACIII 02/09/24 1:45:53 PM #180:	pazzy posted... No. There is. The entire situation is about individuals. Shaq not being open to women isn't even a slight to women necessarily. And even if it was, it has nothing to do with toxic masculinity. "Not all women" acknowledges an individual, and then bringing up "toxic masculinity" does not acknowledge the individual. That's the irony there. Shaq has an opinion and it's his individual one. It's not anything about patriarchy, toxic masculinity, it's nothing but a bad individual opinion of a man that has shitty relationships. A police officer saying they don't trust black people, a parent saying they don't trust gay men (or any man for that matter) around their kids aren't slights to them? There can't possibly be any societal reasons for those that can be brought up? What is wrong with you? An individual or not saying it means nothing. A guy claiming he treats women worse because he's a sigma male is the poster child of toxic masculinity. This is common sense. The only reason you can think otherwise is if you relate with similar opinions. pazzy posted... All over the place. Like when I call you out on comparison to light skinned individuals and saying that's not even the same issue because it still wildly misses the mark, and you STILL keep riding a missed mark of an argument. Like you're still doing now and doubling down. There is no "I'm cornered." You're just literally speaking out of your neck. This is what I'm talking about when I refer to your shit rational thinking . I clarified that it's (obviously) a comparison with toxic masculinity to show that bringing up and criticizing the phenomenon isn't attacking the individual (majority) subjects of the phenomenon itself. It's called an analogy. Something you did yourself when you tried to compare it to equating all transpeople to what one transperson did (which you're the one that missed the mark on, your comparison is actually what Shaq did, not anyone ITT). So did you make things up then? And You're the one missing the mark towards multiple people and doubling down on your nonsense. Don't know if this lack of self-awareness is intentional or not. --- </topic> <cite>GiftedACIII posted [p:978748718] in Shaq says ... [t:80688916]...</cite> <quote>pazzy posted... </cite><quote>No. There is. The entire situation is about individuals. Shaq not being open to women isn't even a slight to women necessarily. And even if it was, it has nothing to do with toxic masculinity. "Not all women" acknowledges an individual, and then bringing up "toxic masculinity" does not acknowledge the individual. That's the irony there. Shaq has an opinion and it's his individual one. It's not anything about patriarchy, toxic masculinity, it's nothing but a bad individual opinion of a man that has shitty relationships.</quote>A police officer saying they don't trust black people, a parent saying they don't trust gay men (or any man for that matter) around their kids aren't slights to them? There can't possibly be any societal reasons for those that can be brought up? What is wrong with you? An individual or not saying it means nothing. A guy claiming he treats women worse because he's a sigma male is the poster child of toxic masculinity. This is common sense. The only reason you can think otherwise is if you relate with similar opinions. pazzy posted... </cite><quote>All over the place. Like when I call you out on comparison to light skinned individuals and saying that's not even the same issue because it still wildly misses the mark, and you STILL keep riding a missed mark of an argument. Like you're still doing now and doubling down. There is no "I'm cornered." You're just literally speaking out of your neck.</quote>This is what I'm talking about when I refer to your shit rational thinking . I clarified that it's (obviously) a comparison with toxic masculinity to show that bringing up and criticizing the phenomenon isn't attacking the individual (majority) subjects of the phenomenon itself. It's called an analogy. Something you did yourself when you tried to compare it to equating all transpeople to what one transperson did (which you're the one that missed the mark on, your comparison is actually what Shaq did, not anyone ITT). So did you make things up then? And You're the one missing the mark towards multiple people and doubling down on your nonsense. Don't know if this lack of self-awareness is intentional or not. --- </topic></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1