LogFAQs > #978712702

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Speaker Johnson: We Thought Democrat would be in Surgery During Impeachment
ScazarMeltex 02/07/24 5:02:26 PM #59:	name_unknown posted... "The number of representatives with full voting rights is 435, a number set by Public Law 62-5 on August 8, 1911, and in effect since 1913. The number of representatives per state is proportionate to population." Yes, and it's fucking absurd. Wyoming has 1 representative in the house for it's population of 576,851. California has 52 for it's 39 million people. Which is a ratio of 1 for every 750,000. Which is bullshit. Why should the ratio be different for every state? The cap should be removed on the house, and after every census we should take the state with the lowest population and use that number to determine how many seats a state should get. --- Furthermore, The GOP is a Fascist Organization and must be destroyed <cite>ScazarMeltex posted [p:978712702] in Speaker Jo... [t:80690621]...</cite> <quote>name_unknown posted... </cite><quote>"The number of representatives with full voting rights is 435, a number set by Public Law 62-5 on August 8, 1911, and in effect since 1913. The number of representatives per state is proportionate to population."</quote>Yes, and it's fucking absurd. Wyoming has 1 representative in the house for it's population of 576,851. California has 52 for it's 39 million people. Which is a ratio of 1 for every 750,000. Which is bullshit. Why should the ratio be different for every state? The cap should be removed on the house, and after every census we should take the state with the lowest population and use that number to determine how many seats a state should get. --- Furthermore, The GOP is a Fascist Organization and must be destroyed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1