LogFAQs > #955269

LurkerFAQs ( 06.29.2011-09.11.2012 ), Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicCanadian Miss Universe finalist disqualified.
KJH
03/28/12 10:05:00 AM
#304:


They already have the freedom to "discriminate" against men even if they may look the part or be transgendered. If your sex is male, they just flat out don't allow you in a female only beauty pageant, regardless of gender.

I don't see the point in complaining because what I've seen as the viewpoints generally include at least one of:

1. It's discrimination and should be open to everybody, including men. To avoid a double standard, any sort of TG/TS thing should be open to everyone too. This seems a bit over the top in PC to me, as it's already something of vain showmanship that "discriminates" against those who are less attractive in a specific way, how that can be upheld yet you can't bring up whether they're male or female feels like either too much or too little.

2. That transexuals are the same as transgendered people, but only if a costly surgery is involved, and that transexuals are more legitimized than transgendered people. Can someone give details on this or the surgery transexuals have and to what degree it actually changes their biological sex? I can't shake that this doesn't truly change your sex but rather imitates it on a superficial level and is rather costly as well as something uncomfortable enough that it should not be pressured upon a person to do it to legitimize their gender.

--
I have no idea who you are, but I thank you for arousing me. - Beruga
Brawl FC: 3823-8243-5663
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1