Just because it's possible to string together a bunch of words does not mean those words refer to anything. I claim that it's impossible to construct such a universe. How the hell would such a universe exist? Could you even give an example?
Simple enough. Suppose God wants to make it useful for people to disbelieve in him. So he puts tons of empirical evidence out in the universe that makes it useful for people to disbelieve in him. For example, nonbelievers will randomly find gold nuggets in their fireplace, while believers will find lumps of coal. It is useful not to believe in God in this universe, but this belief is false.
And by the way, I don't really "care" about the word "truth",
Now you've finally answered the question. Thank you.
Then how do you know which aspects are empirical and which aspects are nonempirical then?
Nothing is part empirical or nonempirical. Empirical is not an attribute like "blue" or "cold." It's a means for an observer to try to observe something.
--
90s games > 00s games