Did you read the article? Read it before making assumptions.
I did. It's much the same. Yes, it's a little better in that it is by one particular person talking about their own experiences, but ultimately it was published by the Mail because it pushes their typical agenda. Even the TC is unwittingly acting in a very Daily Mail fashion with the alarmist and reactionary topic title.
--
Something something something
^Poorly disguised anti-caps sig