SirDiemsma posted...
we outplayed you in 3/4 games. the loss we had in the 3rd game was a total choke but by all accounts they should have won that game.
i understand if you say that the c's could win in 7, but using words like "dismantle" and "win in 5" is insane. i kinda hold you to some megahigh posting standards cause you are that smart but that post was something that would have made biolizard jealous bro
celtics would have dismantled them. the last time they met in MSG the knicks needed a 30 point game from novak and JR smith each, plus 37 from melo, to win at home. celtics would neutralize novak like miami did (something that doesn't get talked about enough) and win in 5.
we outplayed you in 3/4 games. the loss we had in the 3rd game was a total choke but by all accounts they should have won that game.
i understand if you say that the c's could win in 7, but using words like "dismantle" and "win in 5" is insane. i kinda hold you to some megahigh posting standards cause you are that smart but that post was something that would have made biolizard jealous bro
game 1: paul 'knick-killer' pierce was out
game 2: typical game, and this was before the celtics flipped their switch
game 3: a bit of luck was involved but rondo went for a 3x-2x and pierce was LONG overdue for a game like that
game 4: aberration
that said, in fairness celtics in 5 is assuming they don't beat themselves (see: game 2 against philly, game 5 against atlanta; they are indeed quite inconsistent) - but playing their best basketball like they did tonight, they are way better than the knicks playing their best basketball
--
Je suis toujours serieux. D'autrefois, personne ne me penserait serieusement.