Lurker > wiiking96

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Board List	Page List: 1, 2
Topic	Why is Punisher considered a "superhero" anyway?
wiiking96 12/29/18 4:51:11 PM #6	I'm pretty sure most people refer to him as an anti-hero. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/28/18 6:57:15 PM #126	ModLogic posted... _B0xxY_2J_0sHBK posted... The problem isnt that SJWs want to find justice they rather want to be offended and find something to white knight over for God knows what reason. this sums up sjw scum perfectly those who are hypocritically obsessed with political correctness in order to satisfy their own feeling of moral superiority motivated from an ignorant and arrogant Western-centric worldview I can tell that you are another person who has been influenced by anti-SJW propaganda. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/27/18 6:35:48 PM #120	Jerry_Hellyeah posted... It doesnt take a genius to realize individuals shouldnt be enforcing their idea of "justice". What "SJWs" are enforcing their idea of justice? The main problem is these people assuming that the "nice" solution is the correct one, while completely ignoring any potential consequences. These people need to get out there and see the real world. You obviously have a very shallow understanding of what solutions "SJWs" think will be effective at dealing with societal problems. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/27/18 6:32:20 PM #118	darkjedilink posted... wiiking96 posted... darkjedilink posted... Thanks to globalism, pushed by liberals and SJW's. Don't believe me? It's literally the argument used by the left to defend illegal immigration - 'we need them for cheap labor!' You are very clearly deeply ignorant and delusional. So much of what you believe is simply factually incorrect. To start, no one on the left is in favor of illegal immigration. Rather, people on the left want to make it easier for people to legally immigrate and for existing undocumented immigrants to be able to become legal citizens that contribute to the economy just as effectively as all other legal citizens. Any sensible American should want hardworking and intelligent people to travel to the United States. Sanctuary cities being a thing proves you factually incorrect. Please explain to me what you think sanctuary cities are and what the left thinks about them. The left cares more about illegal immigrants than actual American citizens. You again demonstrate that you are ignorant and delusional. This is simply false. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/25/18 7:52:46 PM #107	C_Pain posted... imagine thinking people who want to get rid of the first amendment are well intentioned Absolutely no "SJW" wants this, and if you honestly believe that, you have clearly been influenced by anti-SJW propaganda. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/25/18 7:44:57 PM #104	darkjedilink posted... Thanks to globalism, pushed by liberals and SJW's. Don't believe me? It's literally the argument used by the left to defend illegal immigration - 'we need them for cheap labor!' You are very clearly deeply ignorant and delusional. So much of what you believe is simply factually incorrect. To start, no one on the left is in favor of illegal immigration. Rather, people on the left want to make it easier for people to legally immigrate and for existing undocumented immigrants to be able to become legal citizens that contribute to the economy just as effectively as all other legal citizens. Any sensible American should want hardworking and intelligent people to travel to the United States. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Lol i bought Sonic adventure 2 battle on Xbox Christmas sale
wiiking96 12/25/18 3:35:57 PM #14	gOTTA GO FAST --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Unpopular opinion: Home Alone is extremely mediocre, at best.
wiiking96 12/25/18 3:34:20 PM #60	I'd say that Home Alone is a legit good movie. I can't think of anything about it that's seriously flawed. It follows through on its premise very effectively. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	What characters from the MCU should get Christmas Specials?
wiiking96 12/25/18 1:57:50 PM #8	Okay so, one premise for a MCU Christmas story that I think could be a lot of fun is a Nick Fury story where Nick has to arrange the perfect Christmas party for The Avengers. The different Avengers all have different ideas for what they think would be the best type of party, and Nick has to think of a solution that will satisfy everyone. Hijinks ensue, etc, etc. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Just saw The Dark Knight for the first time.
wiiking96 12/25/18 1:27:54 PM #21	I saw it for the first time this year as well, and I have to agree that it's pretty amazeballs. Heath Ledger is truly incredible and is so central to why it's such an excellent experience. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	What characters from the MCU should get Christmas Specials?
wiiking96 12/25/18 12:41:10 PM #6	AlCalavicci posted... Antman would be perfect fot a Christmas movie ala Jingle All the Way It would also be pretty easy to tweak the Ant Man suit to make it Christmas-y. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	What characters from the MCU should get Christmas Specials?
wiiking96 12/25/18 12:35:52 PM #3	Mareen posted... Thanos. What would be the story? --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	What characters from the MCU should get Christmas Specials?
wiiking96 12/25/18 12:33:29 PM #1	They can be anyone. Minor characters, heroes, villains, whatever. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	I dont see how millennials are struggling.
wiiking96 12/25/18 12:01:05 PM #5	The world is a lot more complicated than you seem to think it is, TC. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 10:59:14 PM #98	Okay I'm back now. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 8:39:13 PM #97	I'm gonna be gone for over 2 hours. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 8:29:49 PM #94	1. I didn't say that first thing. That was another guy. 2. I did technically change the subject after the guy I was arguing with explained that he wasn't trying to argue a particular point. There was no point in trying to argue that point anymore. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 7:51:19 PM #92	Roxborough4Ever posted... "SJW's DONT EXIST!" - tc Clearly you didn't read the OP. - Most people who would self-identify as a "SJW" are well-meaning and primarily want to make the world a better place for disenfranchised groups. Not all SJWs know how best to achieve their goals, but they aren't malicious. CM_Ponch posted... TC doesn't know how to argue and keeps trying to change the subject to avoid admitting he's wrong 1. When did I change the subject? 2. What am I wrong about? --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 3:54:21 PM #83	RoboLaserGandhi posted... wiiking96 posted... RoboLaserGandhi posted... wiiking96 posted... RoboLaserGandhi posted... wiiking96 posted... @RoboLaserGandhi Again, what you have repeatedly failed to do is provide evidence that what you're describing is a legitimate problem. That what these people are doing is actually damaging. I never really made that argument though. They certainly overreach in their influence, but as individuals I don't consider them a threat to society. They are more accurately a symptom of society's problems that further influences them. That's definitely what you suggested. Why are you even arguing about this if you don't even seem to disagree with me? I disagreed on all the points my original post touched on. Okay, fine. How about this: Can you provide evidence to back up this claim? "Most SJWs are people who want leverage in society through a childlike and emotionally unstable attempt to influence the opinions of the masses to treat them as victims. The other chunk of SJWs are those with hyperempathy who vicariously live through the victimhood of others." No, I can't, because this is all an inherently subjective argument like I've said multiple times. Am I in the wrong for saying that people shouldn't be convinced by your arguments if you have no evidence? --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 3:47:42 PM #81	RoboLaserGandhi posted... wiiking96 posted... RoboLaserGandhi posted... wiiking96 posted... @RoboLaserGandhi Again, what you have repeatedly failed to do is provide evidence that what you're describing is a legitimate problem. That what these people are doing is actually damaging. I never really made that argument though. They certainly overreach in their influence, but as individuals I don't consider them a threat to society. They are more accurately a symptom of society's problems that further influences them. That's definitely what you suggested. Why are you even arguing about this if you don't even seem to disagree with me? I disagreed on all the points my original post touched on. Okay, fine. How about this: Can you provide evidence to back up this claim? "Most SJWs are people who want leverage in society through a childlike and emotionally unstable attempt to influence the opinions of the masses to treat them as victims. The other chunk of SJWs are those with hyperempathy who vicariously live through the victimhood of others." --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 3:44:00 PM #79	RoboLaserGandhi posted... wiiking96 posted... @RoboLaserGandhi Again, what you have repeatedly failed to do is provide evidence that what you're describing is a legitimate problem. That what these people are doing is actually damaging. I never really made that argument though. They certainly overreach in their influence, but as individuals I don't consider them a threat to society. They are more accurately a symptom of society's problems that further influences them. That's definitely what your post suggested. Why are you even arguing about this if you don't even seem to disagree with me? --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 3:41:02 PM #77	Dyinglegacy posted... Then who's responsible for desexyfication of waifus in video games? Oh they are still very much here: https://cdn.gamerant.com/wp-content/uploads/soulcalibur-6-ivy.jpg.optimal.jpg --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 3:35:49 PM #72	@RoboLaserGandhi Again, what you have repeatedly failed to do is provide evidence that what you're describing is a legitimate problem. That what these people are doing is actually damaging. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 3:20:21 PM #64	darkjedilink posted... wiiking96 posted... darkjedilink posted... The very concept of 'social justice' is malicious, and anyone suggesting otherwise is either an idiot or a thief. I think you and me have very different ideas of what "social justice" in entails. Then define it. The generally-accepted definition, that we get 'justice' for the disenfranchised by punishing the groups that benefited by that disenfranchisement at some point in history, is malicious on its face. Since when the hell was that the generally-accepted definition? I'm not sure what the best definition of social justice is. I don't know how to best put it into words, such it's such a broad concept. But I feel like pointing out that there are groups in society that currently directly benefit from the disenfranchisement of minorities and poor people, especially the wealthy and powerful. There are people stuck working in sweatshops making products to benefit the bottom lines of huge corporations. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 3:12:36 PM #62	RoboLaserGandhi posted... wiiking96 posted... The thing is, you made the assertion that "SJWs" are "actively hunting down and eliminating anything that isn't progressive". You need to back such a claim with evidence. You also need to provide evidence that this is a large group of people doing this and that they actually have power. SJWs complain when there's an all white or all male cast all the time, or that something simply doesn't have a female protagonist. Or even when something doesn't go political enough, like what happened with Far Cry 5 and its cover art baiting something much more controversial than what actually takes place. Again, this is what you said: "it's actively hunting down and eliminating anything that isn't progressive." This is the assertion that you need to back up. Pointing out that some people sometimes complain about media that they see as problematic is not anywhere close to being substantive evidence. And you need to back your stuff up here. You've been making a lot of broad assertions yourself. My broad assertions are that "SJWs" aren't anywhere near as bad as a lot of people like to claim that they are. I assert that people are exaggerating the degree to which a group of people impact society. If there is evidence to suggest that "SJWs" are actually a serious problem, then it shouldn't be hard for you to provide it. My assertion can be boiled down to this: Anti-SJWs are talking out of their ass because they want something to complain about. wiiking96 posted... Regarding Sarkeesian: I've seen a decent number of her Feminist Frequency videos, and one of her key recurring points is that video game storywriters have a tendency to be lazy and rely on stereotypical representations of female character and to make female characters function as plot devices. If her content encourages video game writers to be less lazy and create more interesting and varied female characters with more meaningful roles to play in stories, isn't that a good thing? She makes her living by nitpicking. She is actively searching for microaggressions and misogynist talking points in 90% of her videos. That's not exactly helpful for anyone. This isn't the impression that I got at all from her videos. Anita makes some valid points and provides plenty of legitimate evidence to back up her points. I'm aware that she can be something of a dick and doesn't best understand how to achieve many of her goals, but that doesn't mean that she has contributed nothing of value. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 2:59:15 PM #59	darkjedilink posted... The very concept of 'social justice' is malicious, and anyone suggesting otherwise is either an idiot or a thief. I think you and me have very different ideas of what "social justice" in entails. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 2:44:22 PM #55	@RoboLaserGandhi The thing is, you made the assertion that "SJWs" are "actively hunting down and eliminating anything that isn't progressive". You need to back such a claim with evidence. You also need to provide evidence that this is a large group of people doing this and that they actually have power. Regarding Sarkeesian: I've seen a decent number of her Feminist Frequency videos, and one of her key recurring points is that video game storywriters have a tendency to be lazy and rely on stereotypical representations of female character and to make female characters function as plot devices. If her content encourages video game writers to be less lazy and create more interesting and varied female characters with more meaningful roles to play in stories, isn't that a good thing? --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 2:30:50 PM #49	Inferno Dive Dragoon posted... Most people who would self-identify as a "SJW" are well-meaning and primarily want to make the world a better place Yeah... stopped reading here, the smell of bullshit was just too overpowering. Tell me, do you identify as an anti-SJW yourself, or have you just been convinced by anti-SJWs that SJWs are a problem? --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 2:12:56 PM #46	@RoboLaserGandhi You are an excellent example of the type of delusional people that I take issue with. While I'm sure that there are some people in existence who are similar to "people who want leverage in society...", they are much smaller in quantity than you think and are in no way representative of the majority of "SJWs" who genuinely want a more just society. You sound like you've been influenced by anti-SJW propaganda, with this part of your post being key: it's actively hunting down and eliminating anything that isn't progressive. It's this pervasive idea wholly resembling McCarthyism. Do you honestly think that these "SJWs" that you so despise have any real power to "hunt down and eliminate" media that they deem unacceptable? Hell, even one of the most notorious individuals that anti-SJWs love to complain about, Anita Sarkeesian, doesn't propose getting rid of video game media containing what she considers problematic messages. Most SJWs just want more media to be made containing progressive messages. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 2:01:36 PM #38	darkphoenix181 posted... wiiking96 posted... "I highly doubt that most people will even remember this controversy in a few months, and most people who do won't care." The idea that "a mob will protest" Kevin Hart over some stupid tweets is utterly laughable. The reality is it already happened multiple times. Now you are just being dense. Got a source on that? --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 1:47:03 PM #27	darkphoenix181 posted... wiiking96 posted... You claimed that his career was ruined. Please provide a source backing up said claim. Do you think he will ever be asked to host a show like the oscars ever again? People will want him in movies knowing a mob gonna protest? The man is rich so he will be fine, but those opportunities that is the natural evolution of a comedian career are now gone for him. Like that is what comedians do, host award shows. "I highly doubt that most people will even remember this controversy in a few months, and most people who do won't care." The idea that "a mob will protest" Kevin Hart over some stupid tweets is utterly laughable. And you still haven't provided a source. wiiking96 posted... or something like that, I don't know all the details). This is what sjwism boils down to. You had no idea what he really did or that he apologized, but you were ok with trusting them and calling him a bad person. Don't trust sjw like op says or you will hurt innocent people. I didn't say that Kevin Hart was a bad person. I don't even care about Kevin Hart or whatever stupid tweets he made. It all just sounds like one of many pointless stupid controversies that will have no real lasting consequences. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 1:39:37 PM #26	RoboLaserGandhi posted... Yeah no, TC is clueless. "Please don't believe in the part of my political association that gives you leverage" Sure thing, will do I'm just a schmuck on the internet who has basic common sense and doesn't desire to belittle groups of people. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 1:31:17 PM #22	ZombiePelican posted... So, a video where some joker whines about a handful of annoying people on the internet being unreasonable is supposed to prove . . . what, exactly? That some SJWs who are annoying exist and might bug you if you let them? --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 1:22:11 PM #21	darkphoenix181 posted... wiiking96 posted... darkphoenix181 posted... creativerealms posted... I don't. While there are SJWs the version that people attack and hate is a boogieman, a perfect target that they can attack because they know no one will defend them. Do you believe there is merit in ruining a black man's career because 10 years ago he didn't immediately hop on the progressive train but has sinced changed his view? Got a source on that? I highly doubt that most people will even remember this controversy in a few months, and most people who do won't care. They remembered what he said 10 years ago. Fyi, this isn't the first time sjw tried to use those tweets to destroy Kevib Hart. I read an article in 2015 where he addressed those tweets and said he changed his views. 3 years ago So why in 2018 can he not host the oscars? Explain that. You are naive if you think it is over and he has nothing to worry about going forward. You claimed that his career was ruined. Please provide a source backing up said claim. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 1:15:05 PM #17	darkphoenix181 posted... creativerealms posted... I don't. While there are SJWs the version that people attack and hate is a boogieman, a perfect target that they can attack because they know no one will defend them. Do you believe there is merit in ruining a black man's career because 10 years ago he didn't immediately hop on the progressive train but has sinced changed his view? Got a source on that? I highly doubt that most people will even remember this controversy in a few months, and most people who do won't care. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 1:09:23 PM #9	darkphoenix181 posted... Then why did Kevin Hart have to step down from the oscars tc? Because he made controversial tweets, some people got upset over them (or pretended to get upset), and then proceeded to not apologize for said tweets (or something like that, I don't know all the details). And some people in charge at the Oscars decided that they wouldn't risk having their ratings get hurt over association with the controversy. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Don't believe anyone who tells you that ''SJWs'' are a legitimate problem.
wiiking96 12/24/18 12:51:54 PM #1	They are either being willfully dishonest or are simply delusional. Things you should know about SJWs in reality: - Most people who would self-identify as a "SJW" are well-meaning and primarily want to make the world a better place for disenfranchised groups. Not all SJWs know how best to achieve their goals, but they aren't malicious. - The term "SJW" has an inherently positive connotation (referring to a person who fights for increased societal justice), but anti-SJWs have made changed how internet culture at large views the term. There's a good chance that you associate the term with annoying and/or stupid people, but that's only because of propaganda. - While there are some "SJWs" who are annoying, stupid, or even toxic, these are only a vocal minority that in no way represent the majority of people who seek improved societal justice. And the vast majority of these toxic individuals are mostly harmless. - "SJWs" are nowhere near as influential towards pop culture trends as anti-SJWs like to suggest. The increased prevalence of progressive ideas in pop culture is a product of a generally more progressive society than what existed in the past, a society where racism, sexism, and bigotry of all forms are much less socially acceptable than they were in the past. "SJWs" are just a small part of a much larger societal trend towards increased societal justice. Don't let the anti-SJWs convince you that SJWs are a legitimate problem. Don't be intellectually lazy. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Conservapedia: The Encyclopedia for Conspiracy Theorists [video]
wiiking96 12/18/18 9:18:35 PM #1	--- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	I believe than President Trump is a lazy, ignorant, unqualified narcissist.
wiiking96 12/16/18 9:35:51 PM #10	XHJYFL posted... Orange man bad :^\| Donald J. Trump is a very unqualified president. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	I believe than President Trump is a lazy, ignorant, unqualified narcissist.
wiiking96 12/16/18 9:12:49 PM #4	ohnoitschris posted... licks pencil Eww, don't do that. Pencils don't taste good. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	I believe than President Trump is a lazy, ignorant, unqualified narcissist.
wiiking96 12/16/18 9:08:07 PM #1	Just thought I'd put that out there. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Indie JRPG inspired by Earthbound.
wiiking96 12/05/18 5:09:12 PM #2	Aside from Undertale and Lisa, what other indie games are there? --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Why don't you care about poor people?
wiiking96 12/01/18 10:05:14 AM #12	I care about the plight of all who have been treated unjustly by society, and I want the Government to take action to reduce societal injustice. I would do more myself, but I'm not exactly wealthy, and I need to keep a decent amount of money on hand to act as a safety net. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	dont you hate wind.
wiiking96 11/30/18 5:02:45 PM #5	Giant_Aspirin posted... yeah the wind blows lmao --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Wario laughing
wiiking96 11/29/18 7:02:12 PM #3	Yes. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	Just beat Mario Odyssey
wiiking96 11/28/18 10:18:48 PM #11	No, Peach was being perfectly reasonable there. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	So it seems like Article 13 is a REALLY big deal and we should all be worried.
wiiking96 11/27/18 11:18:04 PM #86	Duncanwii posted... Who the fuck is Mattpat and why is Soulunion so furverous to destroy the internet to get rid of him? He's just a highly successful YouTuber who makes goofy videos focused on making theories about video games, movies, and tv shows. He seems like a genuinely good guy who enjoys making the content that he makes. He also cares a lot about YouTube as a platform. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	FBl OPEN UP
wiiking96 11/27/18 1:36:45 PM #5	Hey guys, guys. This might sound crazy. But I think the TC isn't really in the FBI. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	So it seems like Article 13 is a REALLY big deal and we should all be worried.
wiiking96 11/27/18 11:54:40 AM #43	LightHawKnight posted... You just realized? Many people have been talking about this for a while now. Clearly not enough people. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Topic	So it seems like Article 13 is a REALLY big deal and we should all be worried.
wiiking96 11/27/18 11:36:07 AM #20	Dyinglegacy posted... What's a quick one sentence brief on article 13? Thousands of valid YouTubers could lose their ability to freely upload quality content. --- The fight for Net Neutrality is still not over! If you care about the modern state of the internet, then please take action to protect Net Neutrality!
Board List	Page List: 1, 2