Lurker > sLaCkEr408___RJ

Write a small speech, and practice it in front of a mirror.

Thank you for your input.

What I was trying to say was, Don't make big decisions when you are in crisis mode.

~You will most likely need that energy for yourself afterward.

Warned.

I'm not interested in yours, so this is awkward.

What's s***ty about them? I thought people would appreciate unbiased opinion polls with clear and concise options.

Nah, it was him wanting to not get involved. He was pulling a Casablanca.

The prequel trilogy began with Episode I. They were making up the rules - not adhering to them. Anakin could've been 18 and the story would have played out just fine. Why did we need a cutesy kid to spout catchphrases like, "Now this is pod-racing!" ? I don't recall that being a part of the original trilogy.

The original trilogy never established the exact age at which one has to begin training. When Yoda told Obi-Wan that Luke was "too old," he was trying to find an excuse to remain uninvolved. They could have had a 16 to 18 year old Anakin training to become a Jedi.

The funny thing is, I do want to get into the habit of doing more drawings of existing characters that I like as a kind of practice.

Currently on Defenders (watching in release order)

Just about the only thing I remembered about RDR1 when I fully played through RDR2 was that John was the main character and that you go to Mexico and that John dies and you play as Jack

Everything else? Forgot. Dutch? Forgot he even existed in RDR1. The story of the entire game basically? Forgot.

So it actually added some suspense in some of the story parts of 2 where knowing RDR1 better would've made it obvious that at least Bill, Dutch and Javier are never in danger of dying in 2 <_<

by taking advantage of some glitch

Some people

you assume everyone

I've said my part well enough. The topic creator shouldn't bump his own topic weeks down the road. Make a new topic and link to the old one with your new thoughts.

That's all I'm gonna say. This argument is going nowhere.

Okay, but the mods disagree with your disagreement.

There's a reason the topics fall off the front page based on posting activity.

In case other users find them and have something to add. Which doesn't include the topic creator going down the list to revive his own dead topic. You make a habit of it, which is I think why you get knocked for it so often.

There's a reason the topics fall off the front page based on posting activity.

In case other users find them and have something to add. Which doesn't include the topic creator going down the list to revive his own dead topic. You make a habit of it, which is I think why you get knocked for it so often.

If the "reply post" is a month later, it's designed to bump the thread, and it's a necro bump. You can disagree if you like, but you don't seem to have a strong grasp of forum etiquette.

If you made a general topic and people used it? Sure, that'd be different. If you called it Cobra Kai General #50 and then made a generic "best character" poll with nothing in the body but a stock logo... and then bumped it two months after the last post was made...

No, it wouldn't be any different. The discussion should sustain itself. If you're bumping it days, weeks, even months after the previous post, then there's clearly not enough active interest to keep the topic going.

It was an unproductive question. It doesn't matter what it's called, if the topic has the same content and you necro bump it, you're still doing the same thing.