Lurker > lordloki12

Shaduln posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

A classy Ben Garrison piece this week

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DcsMOlgV0AALk7m?format=jpg&name=large

Wow imagine being someone that was willing to make fun of people with cancer.

and recycling the fiction that he was responsible for 134 deaths in that aircraft fire.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

UInstinctGogeta posted...

DeepsPraw posted...

UltimaterializerX posted...

In the planet's history, volcanoes have put untold thousands of times more smog into our air than humans. Mother earth is still a'ight.

The Earth's alright, but would humans be? Remember no humans were around millions of years ago when the Earth was undergoing major geological changes.

We might not be able to destroy the Earth, but when can make things miserable for ourselves

Not fast enough to matter....

Happened plenty fast for the chinese.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I mean Zuckerberg does it on his and if anyone would know how easy it is to invade someone's privacy it would be him.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

hockeydude15 posted...

UltimaterializerX posted...

Then they're idiots who deny facts: https://science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-scientist-confirms-colleagues-manipulated-climate-records

Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas): I thank Dr. John Bates for courageously stepping forward to tell the truth about NOAAs senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion

Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Darin LaHood (R-Ill.): I applaud Dr. Batess efforts in uncovering the truth of this data manipulation...

Dr. Bates after the hearing in interviews: "The issue here is not an issue of tampering with data, but rather really of timing of a release of a paper that had not properly disclosed everything it was"

"These types of statements by policymakers that attempt to take one study/dispute and blow it out of proportion are both unhelpful and misleading," he wrote. "We will be working with the science committee to demonstrate the scientific consensus on climate change and to encourage them not to interfere with the scientific process."

Ulti posting a biased source and with no real knowledge of the event he thinks he is proving? Ohhh I'm shocked.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

ScareChan posted...

Deadpool

---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Even with the text alerts, the vending machine for license plate tabs, and all the stuff you can do by mail or online the place still ends up as a standing room only waiting room with people lining the walls. Im pretty sure nature requires the DMV to be a hellhole.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Our secretary of state started doing the text message alerts when you have an estimated 15 minutes left before your number gets called. You still have to carve a couple hours out of your day but at least you can go grab lunch instead of hanging out in the building the whole time.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Xiahou Shake posted...

Corrik posted...

Why are you not watching it????

The first season was so actively bad it chased me away big time. Has it turned itself around since then? Because man that was bad.

Early on they were stuck in a holding pattern waiting for Winter Soldier to hit theaters. After that the connections to the movie universe have loosened up and they have been able to do their own thing. It got a lot better after that but I guess it depends on what you really hated about the 1st season. Plot and pacing get better but if you just absolutely hated the actors playing the characters then I am afraid you are out of luck there.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Jakyl25 posted...

Corrik posted...

Drop pro-abortion and you could probably syphon a lot of them.

Adultery and such does not rate as high as murder of babies to many religious folk.

You can't cry about Evangelical votes when your stances alienate them innately.

What if it comes out that Trump has paid for an abortion?

Obviously we would get the lawful neutral pivot.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

lordloki12 posted...

Corrik posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Corrik posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

banananor posted...

it's also kind of ridiculous to think that allegations of a consensual affair would tank the campaign when a bunch of assault accusations didn't

.

She has Trump dick pics

If she does, so what?

Thats why Trump would care more about this one being damaging to him than the assault accusations. Not saying anything about criminality, just responding to banananors statement

If it is true he considers the Cohen raid more damaging, I think it is for other things not related to Stormy Daniels. And surely even if about Stormy, I highly doubt dick pics are high on the list of caring.

Edit: And dick pics damaging to his presidency? Hell, in this age, it basically makes him more relatable. Probably 75% of America or more at this point has sent genital pics lol. Not like it would have been a minor or something he sent them to.

Poor Anthony Wiener, was just a few years ahead of his time.

I assume this is a pun in relation to sending his to underage girls! Lol

Not really a pun. Weiner resigned from congress after the 1st dick pic scandal when he was caught sending links for his pics to an adult woman. A couple years later it happened again during a failed mayoral race. The underage girl wasnt until 5 years after his resignation from congress. So yeah in 2011 dick pics to another adult was enough to force your resignation from congress but today it would apparently be no big deal. Well if he had that R next to his name at least.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Jakyl25 posted...

Well according to the source article, the one call between Trump and Cohen that NBC is reporting for sure that the investigation has is just one where Trump calls and Cohen tells him never call me again because theyre recording these calls. <_<

Yeah the link I had posted seems to have been a breaking news placeholder. I love that Giuliani's reaction to the possibility of calling into a lawyer under surveillance is more concerned with attorney client privilege and not that you're dealing with a criminal.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Corrik posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

banananor posted...

it's also kind of ridiculous to think that allegations of a consensual affair would tank the campaign when a bunch of assault accusations didn't

.

She has Trump dick pics

If she does, so what?

Thats why Trump would care more about this one being damaging to him than the assault accusations. Not saying anything about criminality, just responding to banananors statement

If it is true he considers the Cohen raid more damaging, I think it is for other things not related to Stormy Daniels. And surely even if about Stormy, I highly doubt dick pics are high on the list of caring.

Edit: And dick pics damaging to his presidency? Hell, in this age, it basically makes him more relatable. Probably 75% of America or more at this point has sent genital pics lol. Not like it would have been a minor or something he sent them to.

Poor Anthony Wiener, was just a few years ahead of his time.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/386082-federal-investigators-wiretapped-cohens-phones-report

So at least 1 call from the White House to Cohen was picked up with the wire tap during their investigation into him. I look forward to the inevitable trump twitter rant.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

"Dude... why meth?" seems like a good way to open the conversation. It shows disapproval without going straight to an extreme. I don't know what kind of relationship you two have so it is hard to say how the rest of the conversation should play out.

You should talk to them about it but know you might not be able to do anything about it. They might need to hear it from someone else or might not be open to it at all.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Yeah 5 dollar footlongs are only on a select group of sandwiches these days. It was kind of a bummer when the subway melt turned into a 7 dollar sub. Been a while since I have been there but I never had a problem with the amount of veggies they put on my subs and they were still baking the bread in store. Possible your friend ended up in a shit store or had a lazy employee making his food.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

WhiteLens posted...

I actually never needed CPU cooling, usually fans have been good enough for me.

That Cryorig H7 is the fan and heatsink. At some point Intel stopped providing heatsinks with their unlocked cpus figuring anyone opting for a cpu they could overclock would also purchase a beefier cooling option anyway.
StealThisSheen posted...

Okay, so those that know more than me



How does this seem? Most of the parts seem comparable to buying them on like, Newegg. Is this an actual decent setup? Good? Overkill?

I would look for a faster option for the ram but that is something you can upgrade later if you really want to. The board would support it and maybe prices will have gone down some if you choose to do that.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

lol yeah totally not proving their point.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

EmDubyaSee posted...

UltimaterializerX posted...

v_charon posted...

It's a shame Trump supporters can't stop talking about this, and all they talk about regarding it is Trump. It's the sign of derangement. Not the sign of people actually interested in the possible peace in Korea.

Even CNN and MSNBC are reporting Trump got negotiations going. There's a difference between not liking someone and being completely delusional.

Not for a lot of libs... (not all)

I would like to thank you both for immediately proving their point.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Ashethan posted...

Never been to a Chuck E. Cheese before.

Was it really that fun of an experience as a kid? Are my kids missing out cuz we don't take them to places like that? Or is it more of a novelty? Seems like a novelty to me.

As a kid it was definitely fun. You got to eat pizza, play arcade games, and screw around in the ball pit/play scape. Then at the end you could turn in the tickets you won playing the games for some cheap toy. There was a Little Caesars branded version near us that had a 2 floor funhouse built into one of the walls. It was like a maze inside and stretched the length of the building. It wasn't tall enough inside for an adult to really get into so kids could hide inside it for as long as they dared.

It was a different era though and I always wonder if they could even get away with something like that these days.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Not_an_Owl posted...

Corrik posted...

Oh my God can you imagine complaining work requirements for food stamps and Medicaid being so good awful also. Lol.

Like omg get a job or get education or spend the time looking for a job or you can't have free stuff!

are you trying to be a parody of yourself

or are you actually completely devoid of compassion and empathy

Corriks lack of empathy is one of his most consistent traits.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

If they aren't towing a ball pit with them when they bring the pizza then what is really even the point?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I tried to figure this out in the past but couldn't find a real solution. I guess Youtube uses the name from your google account so if you had your real name there then you are stuck. You can add a nickname to the google account but even the it still shows your real name but changes the format to John "Anagram" Smith or John Smith(Anagram) which seems very pointless.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Thats a bummer. The few articles I have seen don't have any details on the cause of death but then they mention past health problems which seems like they are just asking for speculation.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

2 of them:

Highlander II: The Quickening
Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Do you have to listen to the music and puppets on an endless loop while you wait or have they shut those off?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

StealThisSheen posted...

Bring a small notepad and occasionally make contemplative expressions

They'll think you're a newspaper reviewer

I kinda like this idea. If you don't have a random friend who would also like to see an opera you should definitely go as a reviewer.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Mayochup is literally just fry sauce.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_sauce

Basically yeah, thousand island without all the added ingredients.

Clicked on a link for fry sauce and left wanting to try tostones. Food topics can be weird sometimes. I have never had fry sauce but I don't see why it wouldn't be good. I mean if ketchup and mayo is good on my burger the combo probably works just fine with the fries.

Also a lot of hate in here on ranch too which surprises me more than the pineapple stuff. Ranch over blue cheese all day as far as I am concerned. It's better on salad, wings, and I can dip my pizza or breadsticks in it.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

How do they already know how long the trial is going to be?

About 5 years ago I was on a jury and it took 17 court days spread out over a month. I would have killed for a 2 day trial at that point.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/Immortality

So I guess I get to stand witness until he gets bored of me and I am erased from existence via Infinity Gem shenanigans? If he doesnt have them yet then I guess my best option is to search for them myself and just endure whatever it takes to obtain them before he can. I cant beat him alone but if I am not the only hero on the planet maybe I can get the help needed to find the gems first. I think as an immortal I would be a pretty decent candidate to wield the gems in a fight against him if I was able to get to them first.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

It sounds like the start of Hannity's radio show today was quite the train wreck which isnt too surprising I guess. I can't imagine having to go live on air after it is revealed the lawyer involved in the stories I have been railing against is revealed to also be my lawyer.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I have not used them but the PowerCore line seems to fit the dimensions you are looking for.

This is the slim version.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01NBQX0O5/

There is also a speed version that has quick charge 3.0 but it is a little fatter.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N0X3NL5/
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

redrocket posted...

Speaking of that, what the fuck is up with anchovies? Does anyone actually get these? Has anyone gotten them in 50 years? I feel like that's a thing from our grandparent's (or great-grandparent's) generation, and it only is still a thing out of momentum.

They are really salty and you definitely smell them before you even open the box.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Why wouldnt they just replace the pizza sauce with the ketchup and mustard? If you are trying to recreate an actual cheeseburger with your pizza and have 3 burger condiments on it already then what purpose could pizza sauce serve at that point?

I will never understand the hate for pineapple on a pizza. It is so good and works well with so many other toppings. It even works on that BBQ chicken pizza.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I had never read the book and this was one of the first things someone mentioned in the car after leaving the theatre last year. Thats messed up, but not that surprising.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I am assuming those set pictures are them in the casual outfits they wear when grabbing a pizza and not their hero costumes.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Of course that Winston skin is the first one I get from the event.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

That seems like a really lazy effort.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

It didnt help that the dispatcher didn't relay the part about it being a kid and that the gun could be fake.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Forceful_Dragon posted...

Then someone should have taught that 12 year old not draw a replica at a police officer.

Is it a tragedy? Yes. But it's a tragedy of awful parenting and of a kid who didn't realize the danger he was putting himself into through his actions.

Again, maybe don't take the orange safety feature off your replica gun.

Because imo that situation was fairly assessed from the perspective of the cops. The fact that it was a child was not relayed to them before their arrival on the scene, and that was a mistake on the part of the dispatcher and that might have altered how the situation played out, but it also might not have because it was still the appearance of a real gun. So that's a big ol' "fair, next" as far as I'm concerned. And it does suck, but it would suck a lot less if people would not point guns (or appear to point guns) at other people.

Uh he was just standing under the pavillion and they drove the car right up to him and shot him as they were exiting the vehicle.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

redrocket posted...

Kenri posted...

Corrik posted...

If the guy would have shot that girl .0000001% of the time or 100% of the time, you have to take the shot every single time. You do not fucking gamble with people's lives that are threatened and that you can save.

Me, walking down the street, murdering people that I'm 99.9999999% sure are completely innocent: Can't gamble with people's lives!

Context, man. A guy pointing a gun at the girl has already crossed a line where he is absolutely not, "completely innocent."

Yeah but that guy eyeballing Tony at the crosswalk is sitting behind the wheel of a 2,000 pound murder machine. So hes gotta go.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

No. Their job is to protect the innocent from harm and uphold the law.

And, no you are just trying to act like everything is dumb you don't say to try and pull an air of superiority, but you are consistently across the board wrong.

I said IF only 1% of the time he kills her, which is an if and is an unknowable percentage (hence the usage to show you the it is 100% the right call every time to make), he still has to make the shot every time.

You are trying to no joke play 20/20 hindsight with gambling with lives with unknowable odds. You act like it is a video game that says "This guy may shoot this girl 1% of the time".

You are not operating in real life scenarios.

If the guy would have shot that girl .0000001% of the time or 100% of the time, you have to take the shot every single time. You do not fucking gamble with people's lives that are threatened and that you can save.

That is how real life works. If that bothers, you there is something wrong with you. The cop didn't force you to point a gun at a person. You made that choice. That is a consequence you live with. It has repercussions.

In real life we gamble with peoples lives every day we step out of the house. Not all of us jump straight to killing people before trying to talk to them though. You on the other hand would kill somebody on the .0000001% chance they might do something. But yeah I guess I'm the bad guy here.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

Because that is real life. If only 1% of the time that guy shoots that girl, you still have to take that shot 100% of the time.

If that guy kills that girl, and you had the opportunity to save her then you should be fired on the spot. That is your literal job.

It would be a national outrage. And omg. Just imagine if the shooter was white and the girl was black. Them add all the racial bullshit on top of it to boot.

You take that shot 100% of the time when you or another person's life is direct peril. 100%. Always. Zero doubt of cause.

So you want to escalate the situation and make her chances of getting shot even greater based on a 1% chance the guy shoots her? That might be one of the dumbest things you have said here. So 99% of the time the cops talk him down or he just decides this was all a mistake and drops the gun on his own. Not to mention you would straight up kill somebody over a 1% chance. Their job is to protect everybody Corrik that includes the criminals.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

lordloki12 posted...

Corrik posted...

If a person is pointing a gun at a 5 year old girl. And a cop is standing there. Does the cop have to wait until the guy shoots the 5 year old girl? Is that the due process and fair trial you want? I mean, you are saying he shouldn't shoot if he is pointing a gun towards a cop...

They should attempt to talk the guy down since them opening fire is more likely to get the girl shot as well. To be clear I mean she also gets shot by the police officer not the random guy. Accuracy is very low in these situations.

You said they should not fire to prevent the shooting of her because shooting makes it more likely for her to be shot. This is exactly what you said. So, in your scenario, the girl is shot and killed.

And the police will say they didn't shoot at the guy with the gun because "we wanted to try and talk him down because us shooting makes it more likely the girl gets shot. Not be the man with the gun but by us as cop accuracy is low"

You just said the cops should not shoot at the guy because she is more likely to be shot by the police officer accidentally to poor accuracy then the man brandishing a firearm with intent to shoot her normally. I mean, I bolded it for you.

You are trying to accuse me of changing what you said when it is right there!

You absolutely changed what I had said. I am not assuming that the police attempting to talk the guy down is a lost cause like you are. Then you claimed I had said cops were just as likely to hit bystanders as their intended targets which isnt remotely true. They will hit their intended target 100% of the time in your scenario but the cops also hurting the child go up as soon as they open fire. Then you tried to paint it like I am just letting some little girl die because in your mind nothing else works besides that guy getting shot. You kept trying to push what I had actually said closer to what you wanted to argue. But if you want to go that route and we have to shoot the guy no matter what I would have to counter with this being real life and not a video game where people hit the ground instantly after getting shot. So your bad guy gets shot by the police but still gets to pull his trigger because ya know not all gunshots are instakills and the girl still gets shot anyways. So why did you create a scenario where a little girl has to die 100% of the time Corrik. Thats kind of messed up.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

lordloki12 posted...

Corrik posted...

lordloki12 posted...

I never said he was either and I think you greatly overestimate their accuracy.

What

It can't really be made any clearer but I will try. Police officers shooting at a suspect who isnt even shooting back at them have a 30-35 percent hit rate. So 65% of those bullets are flying right on by. Ideally nobody else is in the area and those stray bullets end in up walls, trees, or cars. Other times those bullets ricochet, fragment, and hit bystanders. So you either have greatly overestimated the officers aim, or you have thought up a scenario where your child threatening suspect is surrounded by sand bags to eat up all those bullets that miss him.

I would love to first of all see the sources for that outrageous number you just tossed out. Second of all, I would love to see the source for the outrageous claims that cops are just as likely to hit bystanders than their targets.

And, I would also love to see you further double and triple down on how a young girls life should be allowed to be taken and how America if seeing cam footage of it would not roast that guy.

I mean, we just saw how a security guard lost his job immediately for not going into a building to confront an active shooter.

It would be 10 times worse with a cop who failed to protect a citizen and with camera footage to show he could have.

Quickest link I could find Page 14:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/downloads/pdf/public_information/RAND_FirearmEvaluation.pdf

Number drops to 18% if the guy shoots back.

I also never said they were just as likely to hit the bystander as the target. I said they should attempt to talk him down because them opening fire makes it more likely she gets shot than if they had not. I also never said they should allow a little girl to die and your attempts to pain that picture instead of addressing what I have actually said is pretty sad.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

lordloki12 posted...

I never said he was either and I think you greatly overestimate their accuracy.

What

It can't really be made any clearer but I will try. Police officers shooting at a suspect who isnt even shooting back at them have a 30-35 percent hit rate. So 65% of those bullets are flying right on by. Ideally nobody else is in the area and those stray bullets end in up walls, trees, or cars. Other times those bullets ricochet, fragment, and hit bystanders. So you either have greatly overestimated the officers aim, or you have thought up a scenario where your child threatening suspect is surrounded by sand bags to eat up all those bullets that miss him.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I never said he was either and I think you greatly overestimate their accuracy.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

If a person is pointing a gun at a 5 year old girl. And a cop is standing there. Does the cop have to wait until the guy shoots the 5 year old girl? Is that the due process and fair trial you want? I mean, you are saying he shouldn't shoot if he is pointing a gun towards a cop...

They should attempt to talk the guy down since them opening fire is more likely to get the girl shot as well. To be clear I mean she also gets shot by the police officer not the random guy. Accuracy is very low in these situations.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

You wouldnt download a bullet would you?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]