Lurker > banananor

actually, change to Cowboys
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

49ers
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

i'm going to sound so negative here, but i actually would like some help. i have multiple friends that love bojack horseman, but i still don't understand the appeal

yes, i get it... he is shitty... and his shittiness comes back to bite him. so which part of the show am i supposed to enjoy?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

I have trouble defining who sets the "standard" rating

I guess we'll go based off of rotten tomatoes or something?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

energy blasts and fire powers dont really have a use besides fighting other supes

depending on how good the power is, you could generate a lot of energy i guess. that's the only thing i could think of

literally power your own power plant or rocket ship

maybe i'd just use energy blasts to charge my batteries or something.
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

in order, assuming best case scenario for each power (able to turn on and off at will, never by accident, and not useless)

future sight
telekinesis
flight
infinite brain capacity
invisibility

energy blasts
communicating with animals
body bursts into flames

really sticky
super-hearing
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Glados
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

EDH is the perfect format because it's never your fault if you lose and there's always something to complain about
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

red sox 777 posted...

And yet Warren saw fit not to endorse anyone during the Hillary vs. Bernie contest. If not endorsing Hillary would be an endorsement of Trump, then not endorsing the candidate with the best chance of stopping Trump (Bernie) would also be an endorsement of Trump.*

Which, in my book, would be far less bad than an endorsement of Hillary. Trump at least promised to do good for the country.

Hindsight is 20/20, but at the time iirc it wasn't entirely clear who had the best chance of winning

I could understand the percieved harm of endorsing a candidate that was not nominated
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

I am tempted to switch to the rams, but London+lolrams scares me
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

How do these games work? Do you normally have access to everyone at the start, or do you only unlock certain characters later on?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Hell yeah, keep living the dream buddy
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

This might be a stupid question, but why exactly do you want trump to end up being right about things?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Steelers
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

HeroDelTiempo17 posted...

banananor posted...

There's surgery to remove all the y chromosomes in your body?

I'll be completely honest, I'm a little ignorant as to the definition of sex as opposed to gender. I thought gender was generally self defined and fluid, while as sex is literally based on your genes

But I'm not 100% confident

Uh yeah but it's way more complicated than that. If you want to get super technical about it, the Y chromosome doesn't even contain the stuff needed for "maleness." EVERYONE has those genes. The Y chromosome doesn't even turn them on by itself, one part of it (SRY) turns on a gene everyone has (Sox9) and it goes on to turn on other genes. If ANY part of that system changes you get a different result regardless of the sex chromosome. And of course there's alternative sex chromosome variants in addition to that. Obviously the environment (ex. access to hormones) will also affect developmental processes, like it does on nearly all of genetics. And we have basically no fucking clue on the cognitive aspect.

So yeah feel free to not give a shit about chromosomes unless you want to go do a study

I literally said I was ignorant in the post, not sure why you needed to be so aggressive
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

There's surgery to remove all the y chromosomes in your body?

I'll be completely honest, I'm a little ignorant as to the definition of sex as opposed to gender. I thought gender was generally self defined and fluid, while as sex is literally based on your genes

But I'm not 100% confident
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Honestly, I don't have any idea. It's hard to imagine testosterone levels being the only metric, but if you're allowed to juice up for 20 years and then stop 6 months before the competition that feels like a loophole to me

But if the rules are consistent, then they're the rules
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Jakyl25 posted...

banananor posted...

I mean, women can take steroids, but they're not allowed to compete after that

I would consider being trans to having taken steroids in this scenario

Whats the rule in cycling on elevated testosterone levels that trans athletes have to abide by? I assume its similar to disallowed steroid levels

i don't know- do you?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Holy shit this is long. I think he's getting close to answering the first question at the 1 hour mark

I think he did the right thing, but the way he tells his story is a little... idk

It's all interesting, don't get me wrong
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

This is especially apt, because taking steroids doesn't automatically give you a win
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

I mean, women can take steroids, but they're not allowed to compete after that

I would consider being trans to having taken steroids in this scenario
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

This is pretty premium clickbait

I would agree that it's designed more to catch conservatives than liberals by volume, but everyone's free to get annoyed regardless of affiliation
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Just like how it only takes 12 jurors to be convicted of a crime.
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

red sox 777 posted...

Well, it's not a ringing endorsement of Noah. But my point is that standing on a street corner and telling people they are going to hell is probably an extremely ineffective way of actually convincing anyone to change their minds. So regardless of how dire their situation is if they don't repent - it doesn't help them to use a method that won't work.

That's a true statement for sure
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

red sox 777 posted...

banananor posted...

If you believed in your religion, and it said that anyone who eats chicken within five years of their death will go to hell

Wouldn't it be your moral duty to be out there convincing people not to eat chicken/ preventing them from eating chicken?

You're saving them from literal hell

So, here's an analysis I heard from a Jewish friend that I found pretty interesting. The Bible says that before the flood, Noah preached to the people of the world, warning them of impending doom if they did not repent. The Bible says he preached for 100 years. Yet, after 100 years of preaching, the only people who entered the Ark with Noah were his immediate family. How is it that Noah managed to win absolutely zero converts in 100 years?

And the explanation is that Noah was not actually trying to win converts. He did not actually love the people. There is no record that he ever prayed for their salvation. He simply did his duty to warn them - but without the intention of actually saving them. And since he did not love the people, they saw that and did not listen to him.

Yeah, that sounds pretty rational, but it definitely falls into the category where if that God were actually real, I'd probably become an angry theist/ anti theist. That's such a callous philosophy! And perhaps why philosophy, ethics and religion are different fields
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Corrik7 posted...

banananor posted...

If you believed in your religion, and it said that anyone who eats chicken within five years of their death will go to hell

Wouldn't it be your moral duty to be out there convincing people not to eat chicken/ preventing them from eating chicken?

You're saving them from literal hell

Again. This is how some of you act here. Look at your ridiculous example. Realize it describes some of you regarding your politics. Now laugh at yourselves if you are one of them.

Could you be more specific? I don't know what 'literal hell' translates to in this scenario

My point was that I can understand religious people being so crazy, while being an atheistic-ish agnostic myself
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Terms and symbols can come from one place and end up absorbed by another group

Like, pepe the frog started out as a normal webcomics character, got adopted by 4chan (feels good man) and then eventually the alt-right. Even though it has other uses, it's also an alt-right symbol now

In this way there are a few uses of all the terms you were taking about.

I do enjoy internally mocking people who accuse others of being snowflakes while also being snowflakes, or mocking people who shit on SJWs while literally fighting about social norms on the internet (literally being a social justice warrior), or mocking people who chafe about political correctness while finding it politically incorrect to kneel during the national anthem
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

If you believed in your religion, and it said that anyone who eats chicken within five years of their death will go to hell

Wouldn't it be your moral duty to be out there convincing people not to eat chicken/ preventing them from eating chicken?

You're saving them from literal hell
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

LeonhartFour posted...

swordz9 posted...

The prequels are hilarious with their bad content at least which is more enjoyable than TLJ just being bad imo.

as someone who has been rewatching the prequels for the first time in 20 years in introducing my girlfriend to the series the prequels being "so bad they're funny" is ridiculously overblown

they're just bad and mostly just really boring (Episode I in particular)

Yeah, I agree with this 100%.

The movies only become funny when trimmed down into gifs or abridged translations because the pacing is so awful
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

yeah if you enjoy being outdoors and like snakes it could be a fun way to spend a couple years

get to explore a new country, generally change your life
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Guys i just looked up the term that ends the argument

A "Sloppy Joe" is what is called a substantive adjective. A substantive adjective is an adjective that replaces the noun it is modifying, in this case 'sandwich'.
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Oops, I counted/ read incorrectly!
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Lesson learned, don't keep your phone in your back pocket
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Almost wish they'd announce the equivalent of extended (1.X), but with an 8 year cycle

I don't see anything wrong with frontier, but it'll eventually get screwed up like modern, too
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

I'm unable to resist eating any and all food within 5 feet of my body. When I eat giant bags of candy I feel sick. Therefore, I don't put giant bags of candy within arm's reach.

If you're clumsy, plan ahead and do things to prevent your clumsiness from causing an issue.
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Black turtle you owe me $773. This is the 3rd time we have sent you this notice

Pay up or prepare to face us in Court!!!
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

damn, some idlers this week :(

last chance to pick new england or the jets...
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Don't listen to the rolls, this is realtyu bring on the show
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

"I only like veterans who don't get caught"
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Okay, I'm convinced

If I eat a pile of ham in a bowl I can call it a ham sandwich
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Fart. I knew the halcyon days were going to end
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Nrrr posted...

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Wow he went to see Lady Gaga in Vegas and didn't even make a topic about it.

UltimaterializerX
I was there. We legitimately all thought she was dead. Then she brought him up on stage and asked everyone on the internet to be nice to him, and played the next song with him like nothing even happened. Poor guy was crying most of the time until she cheered him up.

why do you believe a single thing the man says after all this time

On the internet, no one knows you're a dog. If you're willing to lie, you can come up with the perfect quote for any article

I don't see any reason why he couldn't have been there, since he made 2 million dollars betting on trump winning in 2016 or whatever*
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Come on guys, we don't know if the democratic candidate is going to have anything to offer better than dismantling government agencies, tax cuts for people making over a million dollars a year, throwing asylum babies in jail, stabbing our allies in the back, turning on a helicopter in the background to make yourself sound busy, allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons, or re establishing the ussr!
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Leonhart4 posted...

I'm still hearing Sloppy Joe

that's just a foible of language

"train" as in the thing that runs on tracks sounds exactly the same as "train" as in practice, but they're still different things
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Yeah, sounds like we're mostly in agreement.

"A sloppy Joe" is a sandwich with what you might call "sloppy Joe slop" in the middle

But you wouldn't call some quantity of slop "a sloppy Joe", you'd call it "some sloppy joe X"

Language is funny
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

They actually look pretty happy!

In poly amorous relationships I'm always trying to look for the one with a secret pain in their eyes

Somehow them having kids makes it all make more sense to me
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Is evil dead even horror? Always seemed more of a horror-themed action comedy to me
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

buffalo for now
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.