Lurker > WingsOfGood

Yeah yeah yeah

Which?

Will you risk Covid to see it?

ThunderTrain posted...

If a guy goes into a store and starts causing problems for no reason (asking to speak to the manager, lashing out at everyone), he can also be called a Karen.

Pretty sure that is just toxic masculinity.

ThunderTrain posted...

any gender.

What

Wii_Shaker posted...

She can be physically attractive and still be a monster.

If she look like a supermodel though, then the manager be happy to see her or is that a wallet in his pocket.
At least every Karen in the meme I see is ugly with ugly haircut.

Turbam posted...

Not all Karens are overweight, smh

But if a Karen is hot, is she really a Karen?

Gonna be real for a moment.
Plenty of loud obnoxious overweight women demanding to see managers and having shout fits till they get their way are black, hispanic or asian.

From reddit

Would you say the same about a swimsuit model in sport's illustrated who is her age?

ssjevot posted...

I have noticed a lot of people who otherwise seem cognizant of the many factors out of your control that can cause you to have issues with poverty, unemployment, homelessness, etc. suddenly turn into bootstrappers when it comes to sex. If you're virgin it's your own fault, even if ugly, poor, etc. I probably thought pretty similarly to that long ago, but when I started meeting more people and they often commented on how I bounced from relationship to relationship while others couldn't even get a single date it started to hit me that I had a type of privilege and I started feeling bad for those who struggle. Obviously not for those who are violent/hateful/etc. But most of these people are just in a shit situation, like most poor, unemployed, homeless etc. people. They aren't inherently bad people, a lot of them just aren't considered attractive for reasons beyond there control (just like some very evil attractive people have no problem attracting people they can abuse/manipulate/etc.).

Wow. Interesting perspective, never thought of it that way.
Perhaps like those other things, the stigma keeps the status quo? Belittle the ugly so those in the middle feel better perhaps.

gunplagirl posted...

Where's the lie, tho?

?
He is not a virgin?

The aliens wouldn't percieve reality through light wavelengths and thus they would never ask such a human question.

cymbaline posted...

Seems like they're more creeped out by a 37 year old going after a 22 year old.

Only because he is a virgin.

https://www.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/gyq5ay/am_i_22f_wrong_for_getting_uncomfortable_and/

You would expect people to say the girl overreacted for dumping a dude she otherwise got along with really well and was dating for months simply because he was a virgin.

But you thought wrong.
According to the comments he is not even a complete person and was manipulating her.

Wtf

TheApexPredator posted...

That's odd, because they were on a movie set.

Can still suffocate on a movie set.

Kobe Bryant posted...

Of course. Says a lot about you when no one wants you. Absolutely worthless and a waste of time.

What should such a person do then?

One_Day_Remains posted...

Tbh, you don't need experience to not 'let out all your emotions for someone'

How do you figure?

They were were-socialists? So like in a full moon they transform?

RedWhiteBlue posted...

Not having experience means you'll be childlike for a long time until you get that experience in dating and affection. This turns most people off.

Not having SO makes them childlike?

pepper2012 posted...

Depends on the age of that person
What age are you talking OP

30s?
40s?
50s?

Conflict posted...

Why do you guys ask these stupid questions?

What would you rather me make a thread about?

Say they never been in a relationship.

UnholyMudcrab posted...

He had it on April 3. That's a full month and a half before he died

Ah. Article made me think autopsy found it in his system. Guess news being shady.

SodomInsane posted...

So does this count as a covid death?

No

https://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2020/06/03/full-george-floyd-autopsy-report-released-says-he-tested-positive-for-covid-19/

Only thing I can make of this is that probably many protestors do as well.

Also, those officer should be tested.

Imagine caring about moderations on gamefaqs in 2020

Nofap is probably bunk, but my point is too often people claim they stand on science to belittle others while not realizing the science they are using doesn't support their conclusion and they actually twisted the result to fit their bias.
I thank you for acknowledging it.

I do think that many who start nofap likely are the type who edge for hours, maybe even 8 hours and so quitting that probably does help them.
Has there been a study on it? No, not that I know. So I cannot answer scientifically if that helps or hurts them.
But I do know that would at the very least dehydrate them and mean they spent 8 hours just fapping that could have gone into something productive.

Pancake posted...

These findings provide additional evidence of a beneficial role of more frequent ejaculation throughout adult life in the etiology of PCa

nice reading comprehension. but you also quoted the background instead of the conclusion and thought it validated your point, so maybe you're just not into reading in the first place. there are a lot of words in between the start and finish of the article. hint: the background is the impetus (reason) for the study, not the result.

You seem bent on making correlation equal causation.

https://www.webmd.com/prostate-cancer/ejaculation-prostate-cancer-risk

What We Dont Know
While research is promising, theres still a lot scientists need to learn. Some things to consider:

Theres no proof that ejaculating more actually causes lower chances of prostate cancer.
For now, doctors just know theyre connected. It may be that men who do it more tend to have other healthy habits that are lowering their odds.

Ejaculation doesnt seem to protect against the most deadly or advanced types of prostate cancer. Experts dont know why.
Scientists dont know if ejaculation during sex vs. masturbation has the same benefits. Some research has found that the makeup of semen is different for each. For example, semen during sex has higher levels of sperm and some chemicals. Its possible that these could make a difference in a mans odds of having prostate cancer.

Not all studies have found a benefit. The 2016 study got attention because of its size (almost 32,000 men) and length (18 years). But some smaller studies have not shown the same good results. A few even found that some men, specifically younger men, who masturbated more had slightly higher chances of prostate cancer. Some researchers wonder if a mans age may affect whether more ejaculation helps.

Seems you need to brush up your understanding of how scientific studies actually work before you rant about science again @Pancake

https://www.europeanurology.com/article/S0302-2838(16)00377- 8/abstract/ejaculation-frequency-and-risk-of-prostate- cancer-updated-results-with-an-additional-decade-of-follow-up

It is interesting to see this study used to support the conclusion that nofap is bad and counter-science.

A few things to note:

1. Frequency of masturbation was measured, not the intensity of it. Whether someone edged for hours vs. let out a quick one, might have an impact. But of course, that was not studied. It might not matter, just that doing it for hours would seem unhealthy.

2. Correlation does not equal causation UNLESS I want to talk down to others is often the motto. This study shows men who masturbate more have reduced cancer but does not prove masturbating more is the underlying cause of less cancer.
That is, they may be masturbating more because they are healthier in the first place. Alternatively, the others may be doing it less because they have an unresolved health issue.

3. This was not a controlled study but a survey. That is, they did not assign masturbation frequency to test a hypothesis. Instead, the men did what they normally did. This highlights the point above.

It is sad to see people who profess to be arbiters of science falling for such easy traps.
You may dislike nofap and think it is a scam made by a religious nutjob, that is fine, your opinion.
But to try to twist the conclusion of a study to act like it supports your opinion with scientific proof when it does not, is something we should all avoid.

All this suggests is there is a link between it and less cancer.

Let's see what the article infact suggests:

Evidence suggests that ejaculation frequency may be inversely related to the risk of prostate cancer

May.

Tweeting now illegal unless your name is Donald Trump

Civil War?

Except she said it will vanish. Been half a year bro.

https://hollywoodlife.com/2020/05/28/camila-cabello-ocd-mental-health-awareness-month-wsj-magazine/

Why is it always the beautiful, talented, famous, rich girls who get the mental health problems?

Heres what there arent pictures of from the last year: me crying in the car talking to my mom about how much anxiety and how many symptoms of OCD I was experiencing, Camila wrote at the beginning of her essay. My mom and me in a hotel room reading books about OCD because I was desperate for relief. Me experiencing what felt like constant, unwavering, relentless anxiety that made day-to-day life painfully hard.

Fav part is where the girl thought saying hi was enough.

In the comments she says "didn't know I was supposed to be witty/funny"

LOL

P4wn4g3 posted...

Yeah the girls she thought were attractive looking wouldn't cut it in my book

umm...ok?

You a chad with huge tinder success?

NotYou posted...

75 matches in 3 days? Tfw you don't have 75 matches after months and months.

Can I use this dude's pictures too?

How many were bots? And as she said, she just swiped right on everyone so...
A lot of fat girls and single mothers and stuff.

EricDraven59 posted...

Its called catfishing. And its been around for like 25 years

Not getting any replies is catfishing? I think you failed to click the video.

SH_expert44 posted...

Oh no. Some rando in DC will know that i like anime and TV tropes.

Next they pass a bill to jail anyone who likes anime and TV tropes. Then you will regret that post

Tired-Insomniac posted...

Can...can they see my search history if I delete it?

Yes

Pretty sure said singletons already were.

https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/gke12c/us_senate_votes_to_allow_fbi_to_access_your/

I have weird fetishes...>.>

Women like it when you do.
Twich thots inspire man fantasy.

deupd_u posted...

"You must be delusional for thinking you ever had a chance with me," which is something I've actually been told by a woman who asked me out on a second date.

??

She asked you out for two dates then says you must have been delusional?
Idk, that sounds like she testing you than rejection. Need more details.

The_Creep_2020 posted...

Well, I am a red-blooded socialist. I was once involved with an Objectivist who worshipped Ayn Rand.

It did not end well.

How do you court the opposite sex as a socialist?

If the girl is like, I like you, but not in that way, the dude agonizes over why she didn't like him. He tries to figure out what he could of done different, change himself or what mistake he made.

If she is like, you ugly. He can easily get over it. He might be upset with her at first, but that actually helps him get over it.
1. Nothing he can do to not be ugly, nothing to agonize over.
2. She is mean, why did I like her.

When the girl is sweet the guy is all like, man she was so sweet and nice and yet for some reason didn't like me, must be something really wrong with me. If she lets him off meanly he is like, she got a problem not me.

C

I find it interesting how dating mirrors Capitalist business so much in the western world. People will screw their friends over a shot at something mildy better than what they had. Sometimes, even their marriages.

There is even more women than men and yet women are treated like an artificial scarcity. Not only this, but there is plenty of men to go around for the lonely women but they would rather be alone competing for the men other women want than have a man that is likely 100% fine and good for them, but just isn't so in demand.

It is like when people waited in line for hours for popeye's sandwich when tons of other places where selling sandwiches.
Was the popeyes one that much better? Nope.
Were the others less good for the body? Nope.
But to eat the popeye sandwich was to have an artificial sense of having got what others wanted. It isn't that the people in line wanted the sandwich so bad, it is that they wanted what others wanted.

I wonder if in Socialist countires the dynamics change to match. Like, women and men are more willing to settle and stuff.

Billy__Beane posted...

The most important thing is to be yourself because then you'll attract someone who will fit with you

Are you saying to lay back and womenz come to you?