Lurker > Hikewne

In 2006 money at that. What a time to be alive.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/9/996ccba1.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/2/2dffd3fe.jpg

Great show. I kept up with it as new seasons released, and did a full rewatch after as well.

Also, this is still one of my favorite things ever:
https://youtu.be/pXeqy4niKQs?si=AiGiYwZBIUcBfKHM

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/6/62311643.jpg

An M. Night Shyamalan film.

Hejiru posted...

See you later, alligator

Stop.

Vicious_Dios posted...

After a while, crocodile

STAHP

Jerry_Hellyeah posted...

Maybe he can get it back, or maybe he's in da Nile

Stoppppppp

I dont mind, until like June. Then its too hot and I just want to get it over with.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/eab0ff38.jpg

MrMolinaro posted...

SpongeBob

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/5cb5c021.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/e953ae8e.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/6/6231848d.jpg

Horith posted...

Since when did bad legal arguments get in the way of the SC gutting both legal protections for people and enforcement tools for the federal government? Kav asking about the intent of the law is a pretty strong signal hell twist himself into knots to support Idaho. Thomas and Alito dont give a fuck so long as they can screw the liberals over (and anyone else along with them is acceptable collateral damage). Roberts and Gorsuch dont have any need for maintaining the pretense that theyre fair-minded. And I believe ACB is leaning against Idaho as much as I believed she was being honest about respecting Roe as settled law.

You have a good point - with this court, it doesnt seem to matter what the legal arguments actually are or what the scope should be. They could very well declare EMTALA unconstitutional and it wouldnt surprise me. I listed things that ACB said during oral arguments today, I never made any claims as to how anyone would rule.

Kradek posted...

The person I was hearing about this from was saying it sounded like she was echoing Sotomayor's questioning and commented that it may be because she's a woman and as such they obviously see abortion/bodily autonomy rights, as well as the healthcare associated with it, very differently than men who think women should just be breeding sows and cooks.

She jumped in after a question from Sotomayor to Idaho and said Im kind of shockedyour own expert had said below that these kinds of cases were covered, and youre now saying theyre not?Well, youre hedgingJustice Sotomayor is asking you would this be covered or not, and it was my understanding that the legislators witnesses said that these would be coveredSome doctors might reach a contrary conclusionis what Justice Sotomayor is asking youWhat if a prosecutor thought differentlythat no good faith doctor could draw that conclusionwould that doctor be prosecuted?

Later she said But why are you here? In response to Idahos argument that the federal law and Idahos law basically were not contradictory. Well, hold on a secondyoure here because there is an injunctionand if your law can fully operate because EMTALA doesnt curb Idahos authority to enforce its law

It really was hard to follow Idahos legal argument here. It seemed to be far reaching to the point that they want to invalidate EMTALA, but then it somehow became Idahos law is compliant with EMTALA.

Its not a surprise, but she also asked if Idaho has conscience exemptions for doctors who would not want to perform abortions, etc.

littlebro07 posted...

Id be happy with a remaster of those games tbh. Theyre still fun as hell to play through, just need some polishing

I still play them (and The Third Age) on PS2. Even just a digital release on modern consoles would be great, but again wishful thinking.

TomClark posted...

RotK was a fucking brilliant game. I would love something similar to that.

I'm not sure how I feel about this game - a big part of the appeal of Animal Crossing is making the village feel like your own as you watch it grow, so sticking that gameplay in a pre-existing and very well established setting seems like it would detract from that.

But that said, it does look charming as hell, and everyone loves some LotR, so I'm gonna keep an eye on this.

Ill keep an eye on it too, anything LOTR usually gets my attention, even if it leads to perpetual disappointment with every new release.

I love Conquest as well, even though it was blatantly unfinished and unbalanced. I still play it on PS3 from time-to-time, but not as much as the prior eras LOTR games.

I know it will probably never happen again, but I really wish we could get more LOTR games like the ones for the films, especially The Two Towers and ROTK on main consoles. Just hack n slash fun (and frustration).

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/eacea39b.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/eea4dcc9.jpg

Pikachuchupika posted...

Rimworld but the colonists are all Vegy.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/9/956b9e38.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/0/0d9c9bd1.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/e5261603.jpg

4.

Not sure why but it reminds me of this emoji

It may just be fissures or whatever the term is. If it continues over the course of several bowel movements without improving then you should go to a doctor.

Parks and Rec.

Old cartoons or thunderstorm sound effects.

Omega Mart.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/d/d30f7f49.jpg

No.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/8/89297766.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/ffb3ef5e.jpg

Makes sense to me. Its just like how are is pronounced is, so when the line This guy are sick comes up its actually pronounced This guy is sick.

ClayGuida posted...

https://youtu.be/u76Lxn9jrNo?si=lZQAP0RjkjI0n02k

Was going to post this.

No.

Reminds me of this Smores milkshake I had a few months ago:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/7/75e346f7.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/3/3a42901a.jpg

Landlocked states.

Its day.

These musings are as inadequately supported as they are gratuitous is the funniest line Ive read in the Kagan/Sotomayor/Jackson concurrence so far. I know this is a very serious case, but you have to find humor somehow.

i like how they quoted from Justice Roberts concurring opinion on Dobbs, where he stated he would not have overturned Roe v. Wade like the others were doing but that he would have ruled in favor of the restrictions sought by Mississippi, basically reiterating that back at the same justices (mostly) who also went way further than the question at hand in that case as well to totally overturn Roe v. Wade.

Yes.