Lurker > Darklit_Minuet

KingCrabCake posted...

HypnoCoosh posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

I don't need to do any of those things lmao

Rent a hotel room

That's why hes on ignore
Dude just trolls

Says the troll

HypnoCoosh posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

I don't need to do any of those things lmao

Rent a hotel room

Why would I waste my money when I can just continue staying at home?

I don't need to do any of those things lmao

KingCrabCake posted...

ChainedRedone posted...

muchdran posted...

Ids are valid for 8 years or something. How do you do anything without one?

So you constantly get pulled over or something? Unless you're being hired I don't see what important purpose they'd serve.

Except the dozen of things you need it for

Lol like what? I don't need my ID for anything but driving

Dyinglegacy posted...

Well, I mean, if God exists, then he's god, and kinda allowed to be. We're just peons.

Which is why we need to side with Satan and overthrow him

muchdran posted...

Ids are valid for 8 years or something. How do you do anything without one?

I'm 27 now so I don't get carded to buy alcohol anymore. If I didn't drive I wouldn't ever need an ID on me. Can't think of a single time in the past few years I've had to display mine
---

Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1

KingCrabCake posted...

BJ-blazkowics posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

KingCrabCake posted...

Its funny people can go get cigarettes, lottery tickets, welfare, food stamps...but go get a voter id. Nope cant do it. Somehow poor people become completely incapable of getting a voter id

It's also funny that you think ignoring arguments and points just to repeat yourself is a decent retort.

He blocks everyone who he disagrees with, so odds are he just never noticed the arguments

lmao so sad

That isnt true. I have Dark block cause he has the dumbest opinions ever.

Like for example...he thinks if you use a toy gun in a robbery...you shouldn't be charged with armed robbery

And you think that voter ID laws are okay. You're far worse

Swatting wouldn't happen if it didn't work. People know if they call the cops and report someone, that person will have their home broken into.

You can't stop assholes from trolling. Arrest one and a dozen more will spring up in his place.

Instead, cops should verify the information they receive before breaking into someone's home

I mean...they have smash bros. The others have nothing this year

You can make up for it by cutting sleep. Sleep is an even bigger waste of time, because you can't reddit while doing it

The outrage over selfies is worse than the actual selfies.

FFS it's just idiots taking pictures of themselves. Why do people get so up in arms about it? I don't do it because it's stupid and pointless, but if you're not harming anyone, do whatever the fuck you want

No, shooters by definition cannot be good. They're a horrible genre that shouldn't exist. Play some weaboo crap instead

UnfairRepresent posted...

KingCrabCake posted...

Its funny people can go get cigarettes, lottery tickets, welfare, food stamps...but go get a voter id. Nope cant do it. Somehow poor people become completely incapable of getting a voter id

It's also funny that you think ignoring arguments and points just to repeat yourself is a decent retort.

He blocks everyone who he disagrees with, so odds are he just never noticed the arguments

AlephZero posted...

I laughed at all the hype there was to buy a seven year old game on Switch at full price.

Who the fuck is buying them at full price?

ALIEN_WORK2HOP posted...

I get that most of their stuff sounds the same and is whiny emo crap, but I still liked the sounds. Also a good live act.

I mean...one of the biggest complaints about them was that most of their albums had a different style, which is the opposite of sounding the same

Nobody pays for Switch games lmao

Deed to Trump

Glad to hear you finally got your wish :3 know this means a lot to you

It's just similar in that you're taking one mon from birth to death.

Digiworld has way more exploration and recruitment, just the actual monster raising system is similar

HiddenLurker posted...

Kineth posted...

Businesses have the right to refuse service. All they had to do was bite their tongue on why and there wouldn't be any case for discrimination.

You mean like the recent other baker story? That got two employee's fired because the bitch cried racism after showing up after closing time? Yeah good luck with the court of "public opinions".

Two white people who also came in after closing time were served. She wasn't.

Between Trump and upholding bigotry, why don't you guys just leave your sinking ship and move up here to Canada?

Good. He's both a cop defender and a Zimmerman defender. Fucking monster

KainWind posted...

How did that game work? DW3 is one of my favorite games ever, but it's also the only Digimon game I've played.

You ever play Monster Rancher?

nicklebro posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

I'm pro criminal justice reform and hate the way US jails currently work. Doesn't mean I have to feel sympathy for people who get themselves killed while committing a crime.

It's almost like I can be against government punishment while also being for personal responsibility

Ok... Idk why you're getting defensive about that tho... It's not like I challenged you on any of those points.

Did anyone even imply you need to feel sympathy for criminals? I really don't get what prompted your post or what it's replying to.

I just don't see why you're against this.

People who get themselves killed can't recidivize either. While I'd be absolutely against the death penalty being used on them, there's nothing wrong with them getting themselves killed.

It's like Batman. I'm against killing people but that doesn't mean I have to save them when they get themselves into a situation by their own attempted thievery

nicklebro posted...

KamenRiderBlade posted...

Why do you root for making the lives of Criminals easier?

I don't believe in the Scandinavian system of prisons / justice, it's not a good long term model IMO.

And our current system is to weak / easy on criminality as is.

I root for society as a whole to be as efficient and productive as possible. The Scandinavian system has thus far proven to be far more effective than our "shape up or ship out" method.

Really how am I supposed to look at what you just said as anything other than extremely ignorant, short sighted, and petty? There's a system that's had extremely impressive results and you're just hand waving them simply because you don't like them. Lol I mean seriously man... Why do you care more about exacting revenge than doing what benefits society?

Do you have any evidence whatsoever to back up your claims?

I'm pro criminal justice reform and hate the way US jails currently work. Doesn't mean I have to feel sympathy for people who get themselves killed while committing a crime.

It's almost like I can be against government punishment while also being for personal responsibility

A lot of the progression in Hoenn fucked you over depending on your bike. Which was stupid. You shouldn't have to switch bikes to explore different routes. Glad they never brought back that awful mechanic.

Not to mention that one route with super tall grass that you can't bike through.

Between that and all the water routes, it's like the game is purposely trying to get you to go through the world more slowly.

There are sequels though.

PSP has Redigitize, 3DS has an enhanced version of that in Decode. They were never localized, but the PSP version has a translation patch released a while back. 3DS version's translation patch should be out later this year.

This game is basically a "remake" of the PS1 version, but with way more digimon including mega levels, and more plot/characters. Some people don't like that because it takes away from the wild feel of the first game, but I think the upsides way outweigh the downsides

https://gamefaqs.akamaized.net/screens/e/8/9/gfs_271082_2_5.jpg

Then there's Next Order on the Vita (also not localized but you can play it in English if you know how), and a much better version on the PS4. Same basic mechanics, except you raise two Digimon at once. Sounds complicated but they streamlined a lot of things so that you could raise two mons without a lot of difficulty

https://apollo2.dl.playstation.net/cdn/EP0700/CUSA05392_00/FREE_CONTENTUPXUK2vowUTv7WASnR8Z/digimon1.jpg

Though speaking strictly from nostalgia, dunno if anything will beat the PS1 version for me. These games are *amazing*, but I nothing can beat my childhood.

Darkrobotisback posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Darkrobotisback posted...

You legally cannot say that you had no part in the persons injuries or death if that happens.

Sure you can. You didn't tell them to steal your fucking bike, they decided to do it of their own volition

And is there any laws that will protect that notion? I doubt it.

Many states allow you to use lethal force to defend your property. Castle doctrine laws, look it up.

Darkrobotisback posted...

You legally cannot say that you had no part in the persons injuries or death if that happens.

Sure you can. You didn't tell them to steal your fucking bike, they decided to do it of their own volition

Darkrobotisback posted...

ThePrinceFish posted...

Darkrobotisback posted...

fuzzylittlbunny posted...

Yes, absolutely. If some douchebag is trying to steal my stuff, he should, at the very least, be prepared to face repercussions. I mean it's like if you tried to steal something in front of the owner and they fought back. Only this time, the owner didn't have to be there to do so :3

In this case, they literally left their bike in front of a seemingly busy area.

It's the owners fault if they were naive enough to leave their bike unattended in the public with no chains or locks of any kind to make the bike immobile...

Nobody ever deserves to be the victim of a crime, no matter how "naive" they were. The hell is wrong with you?

All I'm saying...
Is that there are ways to protect your stuff...
You know without having to kill someone...

But you're not killing anyone in this scenario.

Some idiots might end up killing themselves while trying to rob you. That's on them, and I feel no sympathy for them whatsoever

UnfairRepresent posted...

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

She does not deserve serious jail time,

She murdered her husband.

Killing someone in defense of another life is acceptable

Darkrobotisback posted...

DiegoSanchez206 posted...

Darkrobotisback posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

In this case its the thief responsible for the death of themselves

If someone cuts your brakes, and you rammed into the brick wall.
Would you be considered responsible for your own death?
Of course not, someone had the intention to seriously injure/kill you.
Same thing applies here, but on a smaller scale.

It literally does not. This is a horrible comparison.

It's the same crime.
You tampered with vehicle to the point where it does not operate in its intended function.
Vehicle as a result becomes a hazard, and the ultimate end result becomes death/or injury.
You happen to know about this knowledge, and use it as a means to "take justice in you own hands".

I see nothing wrong with people tampering with their own vehicles. If they wanna take off the steering wheel or remove the brakes, good for them. As long as it's in perfect working order when they decide to drive it.

If someone tries to steal that vehicle, it's on them when they realize they can't steer or brake. Shouldn't fucking steal someone's car

ModLogic posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

No jury would convict someone over this, because everyone has had something stolen from them in the past and wants to punish the assholes who do that kind of shit.

so has anyone rigged their front door with a shotgun and gotten away with it?

That's a no no because people can have legitimate reasons to enter your front door without your permission. For example, paramedics or the fire department trying to save you.

There's no legitimate reason that would allow someone to steal your bike, therefore the same logic does not apply.

UnfairRepresent posted...

I feel like you're underplaying fucking murder by going "Yeah it's murder but... I like cats so lulz who cares?"

Just like how you underplay fucking murder by going "Yeah it's murder but... I like white hispanics so lulz who cares?"

Darkrobotisback posted...

In the end of the day, the court will rule out manslaughter or 3rd degree murder.

Which is a problem of the court

Darkrobotisback posted...

You could try to fight it and I can guarantee you that you will lose, especially if you have footage of the guy dying/injured.

That's why I'll do a jury trial. No jury would convict someone over this, because everyone has had something stolen from them in the past and wants to punish the assholes who do that kind of shit.

Darkrobotisback posted...

But you sabotaged the bike to the point where it could kill him.

It's my fucking bike. I should be able to sabotage it however the fuck I want, because nobody's allowed to ride it without asking my permission

Darkrobotisback posted...

You could of locked the bike in a way that posed no harm to another person, but you've decided to impose a mechanism that defies the bikes safety mechanism and you've also recorded him getting injured/killed.

The thief could have not attempted to steal my bike

Darkrobotisback posted...

Therefore you have full knowledge of incident and the court of the law will see you as the perpetrator behind said persons death/or injury.

I have full knowledge of how I decided to secure my own bike. If someone ends up getting hurt while trying to deprive me of my property, that's on them

Darkrobotisback posted...

The vehicle is at motion, therefore the loss of human life is exponentially greater and it's a bike too. There's nothing protecting the guy if he/she falls and snaps there neck.

Eh...nothing of value would be lost anyway

2 is objectively better than 3 because it has way less water routes

Goats posted...

It absolutely should be the people who were donating in the bomb threats that should be getting jail time tbh magneton

How about nobody gets jail time?

FFS America throws way too many people in jail for such stupid petty reasons

UnfairRepresent posted...

However I know you from other topics and you openly proudly refuse to look up the punlicaly aviable trial while you lie about so I'm not going to respond to any more of your posts on the matter as you are willfully ignorant just because you want to believe a story.

It's called faith. If religious people are allowed to use it as an excuse, so am I. I have faith that the trial fucked up somehow

UnfairRepresent posted...

It's okay to kill your husband because he beat a cat but it's wrong for Zimmerman to not let Trayvon murder him in the street?

Killing people walking down the street with skittles and ice tea is wrong. Killing violent psychopaths in the process of harming another living being is not wrong. There's a difference :)

UnfairRepresent posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Why the fuck was she arrested?

Because she murdered her husband

It's not murder when you end a life in defense of another

Why the fuck was she arrested?

emblem boy posted...

?

You said to stop watching TV and go to the gym

AKA become a scummy jock

emblem boy posted...

Hit the gym early in the morning, skip the TV watching when you get home and work on some hobbies

Lol this is literally the worst recommendation I've ever seen on CE

Stop advising OP be a scummy jock

Anteaterking posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Except the guy wouldn't be buying cocaine if the cop didn't offer to sell him cocaine. Thus, the crime would not have taken place.

But in that instance the man was perfectly willing to buy the cocaine. His behavior is "normal" for him. The police officer didn't threaten him, etc. to get him to buy the cocaine.

Putting aside that nobody should be put to jail for buying drugs in the first place, I disagree with this premise entirely. Being willing to try something doesn't make it normal for one.

Have you never tried a meal at someone's recommendation? Have you never bought something simply because someone offered it to you? Today I saw an ad online about a cheap bike so I was like oh what the hell and bought it. I wasn't seeking a bike, buying bikes isn't normal behavior for me, and it would never have been purchased if someone didn't offer to sell me it for a low price.

I'm not a druggie, but if someone offers to let me try something, I might take em up on that offer. Sure as hell won't be trying meth or heroin or any of the big boy drugs, but the willingness to try something offered to you should not make you a criminal.

I swear, some people act like impulse buying isn't a thing that exists

Tyranthraxus posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

But the first of those is them engineering a crime where there isn't any

The crime is the guy is buying cocaine. The first example is called a sting and it's legal. The second example is called entrapment and it's not legal.

Except the guy wouldn't be buying cocaine if the cop didn't offer to sell him cocaine. Thus, the crime would not have taken place.

This is why I'm against sting operations. They should be made illegal.