Lurker > Darklit_Minuet

How would you feel if every store you walked into had your products in locked cases, while identical products for all other people were out in the aisles? Being treated as a potential thief just because of the color of your skin.

DuranOfForcena posted...

hey @Darklit_Minuet, refresh my memory, why do i have you tagged as "WRPG troll"?

Because I disagree that WRPGs should be called RPGs because they're neither turn based nor linear. The term RPG should be reserved for my precious weaboo crap

EdgeMaster posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

EdgeMaster posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

EdgeMaster posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Thats idiotic. Theres no reason to arbitrarily lock up items that dont have a significant theft history. Its an unnecessary cost being trust on the stores that serves no purpose other than to appease irrational SJWs.

If haircare products have significant theft history, lock up haircare products. Just not specifically the black ones.

If Walmart has to pay an extra cost to not discriminate, make em pay it. The Walton family is worth over 90 billion dollars, they can take the hit.

What would you suggest if only the black hair care products are being stolen?

Locking up every single one at every wal mart would cost an arm and a leg and be unnecessary....

Hire an extra security guard

And he'd keep an eye on the black hair care products? Sounds pretty racist mate

No, keep an eye on everything. Stop focusing on the black people products

Well that wouldn't be very effective would it?

Hire a security guard to patrol around the entire store with a high chance most of the time he isn't in the black hair product isle.

Do you think that would be more effective than locking up the black hair care products? Keep in mind if the security guard stuck around an isle where things were frequently being shoplifted that'd be racist too.

You know what else stores can do? Have security cameras in every aisle.

_Rinku_ posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

EdgeMaster posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Thats idiotic. Theres no reason to arbitrarily lock up items that dont have a significant theft history. Its an unnecessary cost being trust on the stores that serves no purpose other than to appease irrational SJWs.

If haircare products have significant theft history, lock up haircare products. Just not specifically the black ones.

If Walmart has to pay an extra cost to not discriminate, make em pay it. The Walton family is worth over 90 billion dollars, they can take the hit.

What would you suggest if only the black hair care products are being stolen?

Locking up every single one at every wal mart would cost an arm and a leg and be unnecessary....

Hire an extra security guard

$7.25/hr minimum for every hour the store is open

-or-

Pack of 20 reusable cases for $50

Or neither.

TrojanPony posted...

I knew it! Darklit is fishing for flames, report and ignore for trolling.

I hate the mods because they've banned dozens of my accounts and have literally never reported anyone in my life. Don't accuse me of things that go against my character.

EdgeMaster posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

EdgeMaster posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Thats idiotic. Theres no reason to arbitrarily lock up items that dont have a significant theft history. Its an unnecessary cost being trust on the stores that serves no purpose other than to appease irrational SJWs.

If haircare products have significant theft history, lock up haircare products. Just not specifically the black ones.

If Walmart has to pay an extra cost to not discriminate, make em pay it. The Walton family is worth over 90 billion dollars, they can take the hit.

What would you suggest if only the black hair care products are being stolen?

Locking up every single one at every wal mart would cost an arm and a leg and be unnecessary....

Hire an extra security guard

And he'd keep an eye on the black hair care products? Sounds pretty racist mate

No, keep an eye on everything. Stop focusing on the black people products

meestermj posted...

Banning an entire race of people is a very different matter than protecting a product that is frequently stolen.

Segregating is segregating. They can't put black products in a separate locked shelf for the same reason they can't force black people to shop at black walmart.

EdgeMaster posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Thats idiotic. Theres no reason to arbitrarily lock up items that dont have a significant theft history. Its an unnecessary cost being trust on the stores that serves no purpose other than to appease irrational SJWs.

If haircare products have significant theft history, lock up haircare products. Just not specifically the black ones.

If Walmart has to pay an extra cost to not discriminate, make em pay it. The Walton family is worth over 90 billion dollars, they can take the hit.

What would you suggest if only the black hair care products are being stolen?

Locking up every single one at every wal mart would cost an arm and a leg and be unnecessary....

Hire an extra security guard

Nomadic View posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Thats idiotic. Theres no reason to arbitrarily lock up items that dont have a significant theft history. Its an unnecessary cost being trust on the stores that serves no purpose other than to appease irrational SJWs.

If haircare products have significant theft history, lock up haircare products. Just not specifically the black ones.

If Walmart has to pay an extra cost to not discriminate, make em pay it. The Walton family is worth over 90 billion dollars, they can take the hit.

Ill agree if all hair products have a high theft rate only black hair products are locked up, sure. But, if only black hair products are being stolen at a high rate, then there is no reason to lock up the others.

You can either lock all of them up or not lock up any of them. That's the price you have to pay to operate as a business in post-segregation society.

meestermj posted...

The most important factor here being intent and reasoning. But if you understood reasoning we wouldn't be having this debate.

Intent and reasoning can't be discriminatory.

They could ban black people with the intent of protecting their store, using the reasoning that their store kept getting robbed by black people. We do not allow that. The intent and reasoning makes sense, but because it's discriminatory we ban it. Same logic.

Nomadic View posted...

Thats idiotic. Theres no reason to arbitrarily lock up items that dont have a significant theft history. Its an unnecessary cost being trust on the stores that serves no purpose other than to appease irrational SJWs.

If haircare products have significant theft history, lock up haircare products. Just not specifically the black ones.

If Walmart has to pay an extra cost to not discriminate, make em pay it. The Walton family is worth over 90 billion dollars, they can take the hit.

meestermj posted...

Tgat has nothing to do at all with the situation at hand.
Product A has a high theft rate.
Product B does not.
Solution? Take measures to prevent the theft of Product A.

That's a discriminatory solution in this case because Product A is a product for black people while Product B is a product for white people.

A lot of people argue that black people have higher theft rates than white people and therefore should be banned from stores, but we don't allow that anymore. For that same reason, we shouldn't allow this either. Nobody is saying Walmart can't protect their products, they just have to do it in a way that doesn't discriminate against black people. For the same reason that they can hire an extra security guard but they can't ban black people from their stores

meestermj posted...

Why lock up the shit that doesn't have a high theft rate? Because people can't differentiate between reality and some imagined racist bogeyman?

It's not imagined. There are actual legitimate injustices that black people have faced in the past and continue to face.

Before they had to sit on the back of the bus, segregated from the white people. They had to drink from their own "colored" drinking fountains, separate from the white people drinking fountains. Now their products are being locked away in a case, separate from all the white people products. It's the same concept, even if it's less extreme.

When we ended segregation, we ended segregation. There shouldn't be exceptions. Black and white are equal, they should get to sit on the same seats and drink from the same drinking fountain and buy products from the same shelves.

medzz posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

If stores locked up all haircare products, they it'd be fine.

If stores specifically lock up black haircare products, they're basically saying "black people are thieves and we don't trust them" and thus are racist

they are saying we have been having problems with these products. why look everything up? that would be less convenient to the customer and more work for the employees.

If you're going to lock up haircare products, then lock up haircare products. Don't only lock up those that are used by one race. That's literally discrimination. Any black person that walks into a store will feel like they can't be trusted to pay for their fucking haircare while the white people can.

We want people to feel accepted, not singled out because of their race.

Newhopes posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

If stores locked up all haircare products, they it'd be fine.

If stores specifically lock up black haircare products, they're basically saying "black people are thieves and we don't trust them" and thus are racist

God liberal are cringe worthy.

Because we think people shouldn't be discriminated against by race?

There's actually laws against that, believe it or not

Further proof that American police are evil

If stores locked up all haircare products, they it'd be fine.

If stores specifically lock up black haircare products, they're basically saying "black people are thieves and we don't trust them" and thus are racist

> Literally putting 3 above 2

You trolling?

Obviously Star Wars

darkjedilink posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

DarkTransient posted...

If you are dealing with a situation where there is known to be an armed offender, if someone has a gun and does not comply with orders to put it down immediately, you shoot them. Better them than yourself. Black, white, cop, civilian, doesn't matter.

Here's a better idea - don't shoot people. That way neither of you dies

It would be awesome if criminals didn't shoot people. Someone should pass a law...

Most of them don't. Why do you assume the worst of people?

Patchwork posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

DarkTransient posted...

If you are dealing with a situation where there is known to be an armed offender, if someone has a gun and does not comply with orders to put it down immediately, you shoot them. Better them than yourself. Black, white, cop, civilian, doesn't matter.

Here's a better idea - don't shoot people. That way neither of you dies

This is simplistic and unrealistic.

It's realistic in literally every first world country besides the US

You can retry it...eventually. Not before the tournament though. I'd have reloaded.

Tidus' Cheer is really great. All the stat boosters are. They increase stats by up to 5 each, and are permanent for the battle. Make it a lot more likely for you to Overkill, and increase your damage output and decrease damage taken pretty greatly.

DarkTransient posted...

If you are dealing with a situation where there is known to be an armed offender, if someone has a gun and does not comply with orders to put it down immediately, you shoot them. Better them than yourself. Black, white, cop, civilian, doesn't matter.

Here's a better idea - don't shoot people. That way neither of you dies

I came

You know, Cloud, this really was our Final Fantasy 7

You could give me some :3

darkjedilink posted...

TC, for a guy who claims to 'not care' about guns, you sure like to bitch about what other people do with their own money.

You're just jealous
---

Posted with GameRaven 3.3

wackyteen posted...

Cops shouldn't be allowed to shoot someone simply because they're armed.

Soldiers down range aren't allowed to just wantonly shoot armed local nationals approaching their vehicles. Cops shouldn't be allowed to shoot armed local citizens that they're designated to protect and serve.

Careful with this logic, people will think you're anti-cop

Lost_All_Senses posted...

All drugs should not ne legal. That would cause so much more regret and crime. People aren't smart enough for all drugs to be legal. And drugs like coke & meth don't just effect the user. They directly effect everyone around that person when they aren't mature enough for it not to

It only causes crime because of the black market.

Give everyone all the drugs they want at an affordable price, they won't need to commit crimes to acquire them

WalkingLobsters posted...

if that were true, then it wouldn't be against the law to do drugs or commit suicide.

Neither of those things should be against the law

NeonOctopus posted...

I remember people were railing on McCain for being too old back in 2008, but he was like 73ish at the time lol. 78 is pretty up there >_>

Because if he died, we'd be stuck with Palin. Dying in office wasn't the problem, his VP was

Puglia77 posted...

Omega Moon?

The sequel to the original Alpha Moon I think

REMercsChamp posted...

Why bother doing something productive when you can go join these guys and sit around and play video games all day!

I'm sorry for not considering bombing brown people for oil "productive"

In fact, I consider it the very opposite of productive, you're actively making the world a worse place

Nebby is great though

I love how he doesn't stay in the bag

REMercsChamp posted...

Sounds like it might be time for you to start looking into the military son

No.

Don't listen to this, OP.

Whatever money you can make, it's not worth supporting the military

Oh yeah I still have to play the two Investigations games

I mean, it's full of outdated rules that don't apply to anyone born in the past two millennia. Don't mix fabrics, don't eat shellfish, don't be gay

Why even have it anymore?

He's objectively the best option so people should vote him in

One for each day of the week.

If you own more than 7 you should be put on some kind of watch list

lilORANG posted...

LordFarquad1312 posted...

The judeo-christian god is almighty. By definition he would be able to prove his existance to anyone.

I guess he could meld your mind into believing him, but then you didn't believe of your own accord. Doesn't count!

So you're saying he's incapable of presenting himself in a way that I'd believe him?

Guess he's not that powerful after all

TheGrindery posted...

Imagine how much you'd freak out if you went outside and the moon actually had that face.

NASA should do that for April Fools Day

darkjedilink posted...

Nostradumbass posted...

darkjedilink posted...

CensorErik posted...

darkjedilink posted...

CensorErik posted...

darkjedilink posted...
The guy was just in a shootout, scared and hiding in his laundry room. He was clearly still not thinking right. Shame on you for trying to muddy the very clear waters here with your political bs. Get an actual rebuttal before trying to debate with this nonsense.

Literally not a reason to approach a police officer while armed with a gun. It sucks that he died, but the cop was in the right, and no amount of whining by TC because "cops killed a black man in cold blood" will change the fact that the guy who got shot was in the wrong, and the cop was in the right.

This is just another cop shooting where the cop was right that TC is going to bitch about until the end of time.

Quite the argument you've posted here. Regardless of how scared and not in his right mind a person is they must know that the cops are going to shoot them in a mere second because the cop is scared. I understand. The next part of your argument is that TC is wrong because he's whining. Got it.

So, you think you SHOULD be allowed to approach a cop armed with no reaction on the cop's part?

scared pig should be able to identify a target and identify him to the target. he did none. he panicked like a bitch and should be in prison.

You'd shit yourself if you actually saw a firearm in real life, lol.

That may be so but I wouldn't kill someone just for having one

Tag, gonna listen soon

When will Americans learn that the cops aren't on your side? Never call them, under any circumstances. You have the second amendment, defend yourself instead of calling people who are more likely to kill you than they are to help you

Pepys Monster posted...

There ARE biological differences. Only SJWs think otherwise. Men have larger hearts and generally more physical strength.

I disagree. Many men I've met clearly don't have hearts at all