Lurker > COVxy

Admitting error is a sign of weakness.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

I'm smelling parental intervention here. Just wanted their child to be a trophy.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

EndOfDiscOne posted...

Don't get me wrong I want Trump removed from office just as much as the next guy

Lololololololol

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Wutobliteration posted...

that's a false dichotomy. Science and religion never had to be separated. But it's just the more we know, the more cocky we get and the less we'd like to think a god may be in control.

Humans absolutely hate what they cannot control. That much is a fact.

Science is based on evidence based induction. Religion is based on faith. Different ways of parsing the world.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

I'd say the system of scientific induction and religiosity are two separate frameworks to understand the world and leave it at that. You can approach science religiously too, and that's bad.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Oh_look_this_topic_again.jpg

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

"Playing the game" vs. "Doing the right thing"

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

DrizztLink posted...

Her lack of campaigning in the Rust Belt also didn't help.

"Rust belt revolution" is a myth.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

People taking an out of context clip from several years ago seems like the easiest way to out yourself as either biased or a troll.

TC occupying the latter space, ofc.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

TheMikh posted...

there were only three episodes

4 counting the cyoa ep.

But fair enough. I think i would say it was the best of those 4.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

I thought that was one of the better episodes this season.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

LadyVyxx posted...

It may seem weird but people really can criticize nominees in the same party they support. The real world needs criticism.

Hehehehehe so clever.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

konokonohamaru posted...

not a Trump fan, but

These words are always a lie.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Bluebomber182 posted...

Because this plays perfectly into the Joe is creepy & senile narrative. The Pussygate tape was much longer ago and it helped Trump. Biden is gonna be held to a much higher standard

Except that was a presidential candidate talking about sexual assault.

This was a presidential candidate talking about volunteering as a white lifeguard at a pool in a predominately black area, and how kids thought his hair was weird.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Seems desperately out of context, tbh.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Trolls

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Very much the same thing.

Got me.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

You realize I was being facetious, right?

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

You seem to be posting earnestly.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

FaultyGourry posted...

Ya, who cares about the shitty immigrant treatment or the tariffs or possible treason. Shitpost tweeting is the real issue here.

Oh, I was unaware that I could only care about 1 thing at any given time.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

FaultyGourry posted...

I can't believe the Washington Post legit ran a story about Trump posting a photoshop shitpost tweet and act like it's some serious shit. Of course he's gonna reply with a wiseass comment about it. >_>

Idk, the president of the united states acting like your average 13yo 4channer on the world stage is some pretty serious shit.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

ThyCorndog posted...

you can't gain weight without excess calories. I'm not saying it's easy, to lose weight cause lifestyle changes aren't always easy. but it's physically impossible for pills to make you fat on their own

It's almost like eating is such an important aspect of staying alive that multiple control systems have evolved.

Let's not pretend like eating behavior is simple and as easy as a moralistic judgement about character.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Isn't the point of a diner-esque restaurant the large menu?

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

dj1200 posted...

none at all. when your dad is a meme at age 11, you're done for.

I get the feeling that you don't fully understand what happened with this girl.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Gafemage posted...

Phrasing, TC...

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

What's with all the old accounts with very low karma always being Trump trolls/shills?

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Proto_Spark posted...

Considering most of the jokes in BBT are making fun of nerds instead of like, nerd-jokes, I can get why people could be peeved.

The level of hate this show gets is just pure butthurt tho

I don't think there are many people irl that act like the people in the show. They are caracatures, like every single sitcom ever.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

https://twitter.com/EJWagenmakers/status/1198359070287249415?s=19

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

It was as entertaining as a typical sitcom is.

People have a bug up their butt because they're overly sensitive about their self image.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Sad science bump

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

https://twitter.com/neuroecology/status/1197886613780606977?s=19

Lmao

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Depends on how much of the propaganda was driven by Trump being the opponent.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Totally not scared.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Frolex posted...

"ok, good point"

I died.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

I think the answer lies in the Many Worlds Hypothesis!

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Xx09x7 posted...

Yeah but people are getting fed up with having to be extremely-PC, and that's part of why Trump will win in 2020, easily. Not that I would vote for Trump, but people don't even realize the backlash that's happening.

This seems like an earnest post from an earnest poster.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

scar the 1 posted...

But yeah, Wikipedia's peer review is quite a bit more elaborate and deliberate than your toy example, as you well know.

Kind of, but kind of not. The requirements for appropriate citation are really off, and you'll find an abnormally large number of claims being cited from random webpages, some of which could have been written by my Mom.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

Just to be clear, 99% of the time, it isn't the presentation of the fact, it's the implication you are trying to make with it.

People pretend to not know the difference.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

I would not use the term peer reviewed for wikipedia, as the term implies academic peer review.

"My mother says I'm special" doesn't make you peer reviewed.

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]

I'm a fan of my TCL Roku TVs. Good quality Smart TVs for their cheap price (well, not the one linked lol).

---

=E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]