Lurker > AreteWastrel

Fossil posted...

AreteWastrel posted...

It definitely hit me when one of the girls said something like "I went from a 5 year relationship with a boy to another 4-5 year relationship with another boy, I have to learn how to know myself now that I'm single."

And I remember thinking wow I can't even imagine thinking I don't "know myself" or whatever. But I guess a lot of people are like that, I know a ton of friends that are pretty much always in a relationship.

I'll never understand people who don't ever "know" themselves because they rely on others so much. Not being alone is basically a non-thought to them because they don't want to be "lonely" (stupid human weakness).

I'm complete opposite, like you (although I've been in relationships). I'd be more confused about changing the way I do things in a relationship since I'm so used to being alone.

Yeah I was kind of taken aback when I heard her say that, but I realize that a lot of people are like that.

Fossil posted...

Would you want to be a vocal butterfly about your past if you could relate?

Probably not, but the fact that I couldn't relate at all was a little alarming to me tbh

I never really thought about that type of stuff a lot or really cared much at all when I was younger honestly. I mean obviously I would like to have a girlfriend but it was never really something that I really cared much about. Been alone my whole life (in terms of relationships), so not being in a relationship was always normal to me.

It definitely hit me when one of the girls said something like "I went from a 5 year relationship with a boy to another 4-5 year relationship with another boy, I have to learn how to know myself now that I'm single."

And I remember thinking wow I can't even imagine thinking I don't "know myself" or whatever. But I guess a lot of people are like that, I know a ton of friends that are pretty much always in a relationship.

I was hanging out with some new people the other day and at some point while playing music in the background these two girls were talking about some love songs and how some songs get them in their feelings and makes them think about all the times their heart was broken by a guy in the past, and everyone seemed to have something to chime in except for me lmao. It's starting to make me realize how much of a weirdo I am for never being in a long term relationship before at this point in my life.

Anyone in their mid to late 20s or even 30s feel the same? It's been making me feel kinda hopeless because even if I do manage to get a girlfriend I'm sure my lack of experience will be a huge red flag or a turn off.

That's probably true, but I don't want to blame porn for my shortcomings

I don't even really watch porn that much anymore, but whenever I do I kinda get depressed watching it and stop after not too long. Especially since I'm a 25 year old virgin, I'm getting pretty close to the "this guy has lost all hope" age and don't really see myself getting laid anytime soon.

Orlando_Jordan posted...

AreteWastrel posted...

The frequency of female orgasm was also related to her partner's family income,

LOL if this is real.

Lol it's not that far fetched when you think about it

lol

Zikten posted...

Then why do some girls fall for dead beats who have no money? It says right there that more money means stronger orgasms

Oh also these are College girls so they most likely have different values than most girls that would be with a deadbeat

Esrac posted...

But seriously, its interesting that they find that women have more orgasmic sex with men who match the typically desirable masculine qualities.

And the kind of qualities evolutionary psychologists would probably suggest women seek in men. Strong, capable men who can provide and protect her and her offspring.

Yeah definitely interesting stuff, if anything its more motivation to go to the gym lmao

Zikten posted...

Then why do some girls fall for dead beats who have no money? It says right there that more money means stronger orgasms

They most likely have some of those other qualities, like being attractive

Milkman5 posted...

girls vaginas arent deep enough to feel past 8 inches iirc

I think it stretches from 6 to 8 inches

also the g spot isnt even real.

I dont think anyone actually believe orgasms were physically based on the dick

but big dicks are attractive mentally

I dont know if I agree with that entirely either, there are definitely studies that show size does matter, I can definitely find some that Ive read before. But bigger usually isnt better, most of those studies say 6-7 inch range is usually the best depending on the girl, but either way its just another factor like the ones in this study. They probably didnt include dick size because thats an entirely different conversation.

E32005 posted...

sense of humor bby

gotta have it

It isn't doing anything for me now but maybe it will someday lmao

physical characteristics of their partner (not anything to do with penis size) and personality traits. This probably sounds like something that seems like a no brainer but it's still a good read.

These are some small segments but you should read the whole thing

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470491401200507

Female orgasm intensity, orgasm frequency, and sexual satisfaction were all related to how physically attracted participants were to their partner. Physical attraction is a well-documented signal for partner health, fertility, and good genes (Gallup and Frederick, 2010). The frequency of female orgasm was also related to her partner's family income, his level of self-confidence, and his sense of humor, all of which may be related in different ways to his ability to compete with other males for scarce resources.

As shown in Table 6, sexual satisfaction was related to how physically attracted women were to their partner, the intensity of their orgasms, how many orgasms they have per encounter, how protected they feel by their partner, how much of a catch they think he is, how old they were when they had sexual intercourse for the first time, how much they love their partner, how often they have intercourse with their partner, the width of their partner's shoulders, and how many sex partners they had. It is interesting that when one ranks the factors that predicted female sexual satisfaction, how much they loved their partner comes in far behind partner attractiveness, orgasm intensity, and number of orgasms per encounter.

Finally, it is interesting to draw attention to the mate value that females ostensibly attach to their partner's sense of humor (see Table 10). As ratings of their partner's sense of humor increased, so did the frequency of sex, the likelihood of female-initiated sex, her feelings of commitment to her partner, ratings of her partner's self-confidence, feelings of protection in his presence, and estimates of his family's income. Women with partners who they felt had a good sense of humor also tended to rate their partners as more intelligent, more popular, more creative, and reported experiencing orgasms more often with him than with other men (r = .408, p < .01). Not surprisingly, there is growing evidence that a sense of humor is a proxy for intelligence (Howrigan and MacDonald, 2008; Miller, 2000).

M_Live posted...

Veggeta X posted...

And this is women of all ages, culture and race right?

No, generalizations like this are hilarious ridiculous, TC's just trollin'

Yeah I stole this from r/braincels, lol

Theres some truth to it though

-drug addicts
-narcissistic instagram models
-alcoholics
-baby killers
-proud fatties
-"dog moms"
-women with a perpetual chip on their shoulder
-dad issues girl
-Netflix as personality

and you're lucky if she's only 1 of those things and not multiple

BLAKUboy posted...

CiIantro posted...

Adblock works on mobile?

Has for a while.

Is it an app or what? What's the name?

Trust me, if you're attractive you'll know it and it wouldn't be a question worth pondering.

What do you plan to get out of it