Lurker > Robot2600

I would rather do chores than listen to a podcast.

ghosts

2nd:
Insidious
It Follows

My first job was at a Golden Corral. This takes me back.

Heaven is cold and logical.

1 point for a sock.
1 point for a Gucci jacket.

You get 1 fucking point, how is this hard to understand?

sex tbqh

cool topic

1 point per clothes

need 999,999 for heaven

big cities in the south are still liberal :P

it's more about gerrymandering than numbers. look at the popular votes...America is a liberal country fighting crazy voting laws and other nonsense.

condoms were around in Ancient Egypt.

willow, nes

somehow I doubt elon's brain chip is the answer

and then do exactly the same thing with Fi and Midna

it's just a numbers game and luck! having 7 interviews is still an accomplishment. you'll probably be so relax and chill at one of the next few interviews that you totally nail it.

games is good so i forgive rockstar

sex tbh

You should check out "Vampire Survivors" on Steam.

i would never

Yea I used to play MTG but quit.

im not sure i know what the heart of the cards is

WoW
Chrono Trigger
Final Fantasy 7
Orange Box (counts as 1 game)
Skyrim
Red Dead 2
GTA5
Minecraft
Valorant
Overwatch

Alteres posted...

Never come across anyone else that has read Hyperion tbh, sequels werent bad.

hyperion is awesome! i need to get the 2nd one.

Also Ringworld is actually the best adventure book series.,

You need Wheel fo Time ffs.

best books;

monkmith posted...

of course not, they believe in the super devil

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/6/4/3/AAD2RLAACYQb.jpg
note the flying motorcycle and the jar of marmalade that makes you commit adultery.

this guy is like low-tier demon at best.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/6/2/2/AABHfBAAC3Qe.jpg
Camio, the President of Hell
https://www.72goetia.com/p/list-of-demons.html
Much cooler.

about SEX fuck SPORTS

I guess the audience is the real American Psycho, after all.

the Tao Te Ching

(and the I Ching if you also like devil magic)

FortuneCookie posted...

Somehow, I don't think this individual would be popular among the alt-right.

It's the satan and the crossdressing. They can't handle that.

vegan fried tofu rolls

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/6/1/4/AABHfBAAC3QW.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/6/0/4/AABHfBAAC3QM.jpg
I mean, look how awesome the title screen is.
(edit: gameFAQs made it fuzzy, it looks unbelievably crisp, like a high-def PS1 game, in reality).

There is a free, web-based demo you can play as well (to see if you like it. the Steam exe runs much smoother than the browser game):
https://poncle.itch.io/vampire-survivors

I'm calling it now, this'll be one of the biggest indie games this year.

https://law.duke.edu/sports/sex-sport/comparative-athletic-performance/

From the first line: "there is an average 10-12% performance gap between elite males and elite females."

10-12% is basically what I said earlier. That 10% looks like a lot at arbitrary sports games. In terms of biology it's not that much difference.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/9/7/AABHfBAAC3J1.jpg

Game is awesome.

$2.99, early access, more fun than Super Mario Bros. 3.

west virginia is actually the worst place in america

I wear my miniskirts instead.

I was a while in writing that post and reading some more stuff.

Even in modern humans, the fact that men are "stronger" than women is 90% social construct. women are literally scared away from working out too much and "getting too big." sure testosterone or whatever, but if you ever go to the gym you know there is nothing stopping girls from getting ripped except societal standards.

think about the varsity girls in high school, they could kick most people's ass.

I've worked out with women as workout partners and inevitably they are lifting as much as me in many areas in just as much time as it would take a guy.

Anyway the Penn State article talks about how it was previously thought that levels of dimorphism were high (that's why you guys are finding so much stuff about that, this new research is only 7 years old).

"Previous convention in the field was that there were high levels of dimorphism in the Australopithecus afarensis population," said Philip Reno, assistant professor of anthropology, Penn State. "Males were thought to be much larger than females."

[...]

The article goes on, but it talks about how the statistical methodology used in the past was wrong, with Lucy being assumed to be a typical sample, and thus counted many times in most calculations (specifically in the past when there were less available samples). The new study just counts every sample that we have once.

edit: to therefore discover that dimorphism was less in the past and has increased with time, rather than the inverse, or staying stable.

One body size article:
Penn State. "Not much size difference between male and female Australopithecines." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 28 April 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150428151512.htm>.

Another behind a paywall, but you can read first page:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/667605?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

it's important to note that the author seems to take sexual dimorphism for granted, which is strange, but admits the range of dimorphism is Homo erectus is equal to or less than modern humans...

Walking with Cavemen also mentions this concept.

In any case, the gender roles stuff still shoots down the idea that rape would have been super-common in the past.

Perascamin posted...

Yeah animals don't really ask for consent so it would have been pretty similar for Neanderthals

You'd be wrong, Neanderthals were highly advanced. Plenty of animals also ask for consent. Penguins, for example. Also, male lizards have to attract and impress a female.

MabusIncarnate posted...

Lmao, thanks for the visual

It's from Walking with Cavemen on Netflix, I think. 100 minutes or so of documentary. It's really good if this is the one I am thinking of.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/may/14/early-men-women-equal-scientists
"Early Men and Women were equal size"

https://theconversation.com/did-prehistoric-women-hunt-new-research-suggests-so-149477
This talks about how cavewomen hunted probably equal to men. At a Neolithic hunter burial site they could identify 41% of the skeletons as women. Some I think they couldn't tell one way or the other.

fuck yes it's wrong.

and that's why I do it.

OVERGOATED posted...

damn i didn't think of that. Yeah.

no it wouldn't have. gender dimorphism didn't happen in humans until civilization (i.e. before that men and women were equal size). it was sexual selection in cities and specialized labor that made men big and women smaller.

Intro2Logic posted...

This stuff is a bigger problem than CRT ever could be

CRT is tame academic shit from the 1980s that these people don't (obviously) understand.

"white privilege" is just a harsher way to say "the black man has it more difficult in america"
that and your standard prison-industrial complex observations, specifically about race, and you've got the basic idea.

the problem with banning it is that it's literally just observations of reality, so you just ban talking about reality?

god damn republicans.

It probably would have been gross foodplay. fucking while eating a giant antelope leg together.