Lurker > Ruvan22

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Thanks, that's a really helpful explanation/breakdown!
And here all I knew about you was that you had cats

Smackems posted...

Hey guess what I got

Was it your brother's chicken?

Smackems posted...

Lastly, there's another old lady in my living room telling my grandma the vaccine is killing people. My god I wish they'd quit with that shit. It's always a battle to get her to take the newest shot because of that

Why are you letting random old ladies into your house?

Brown guy

Unsugarized_Foo posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/3/8/AAIpQ1AAC6Vm.jpg https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/3/9/AAIpQ1AAC6Vn.jpg https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/4/0/AAIpQ1AAC6Vo.jpg https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/4/1/AAIpQ1AAC6Vp.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/4/2/AAIpQ1AAC6Vq.jpg

This reminds me that the red caps have been extra busy with memes this week. Its like they got a russian farm working on this

NGL, you had me in the first half

Machete posted...

your grasp of English gets a 3/6

I mean it's RealDill so...

Awesome job!!

And it was the ONLY Die Hard with an original screenplay/script :/

I really wish we had gotten one last one with Lucy and Jack, maybe even Holly, to show that though he wasn't the best husband/father, they all stayed in each other's lives

au_gold posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/4/7/AAZ5w5AAC6C_.jpg

I don't get it?

AngelsNAirwav3s posted...

https://twitter.com/coldxman/status/1491186686214086656?s=20&t=fnWG-PRcXazoct3MfPdNKg

@AngelsNAirwav3s

How exactly would MLK dream of Rogan's attitude being worldwide?

ExtremeLuchador posted...

It's what police officers have told me.

So you make your live stream at work accessible to the general public?

Humble_Novice posted...

https://bit.ly/34J3WA6

Well then

Fam_Fam posted...

Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger crossed a line, Ronna McDaniel, the Republican National Committee chairwoman, said in a statement. They chose to join Nancy Pelosi in a Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens who engaged in legitimate political discourse that had nothing to do with violence at the Capitol.

That's the clarifying statement? That looks like the original statement? Again which "ordinary citizens" are they referring to, as none were named (afaik) in either this committee or the impeachment hearing...

Look you posted this
Fam_Fam posted...

ok? he's entitled to his opinion. as I said, the RNC wrote a clarifying statement, which I have included here, that explicitly stated that they were not intending to describe the violent actors as being part of the legitimate political discourse.

whether or not you choose to accept the amendment is a personal choice, I suppose.

I'm asking for their clarifying statement that "explicitly stated that they were not intending to describe the violent actors as being part of the legitimate political discourse"

Veggeta_MAX posted...

Are we talking about the same SH game? Cybil gives Harry a handgun when they first meet in the cafe in the beginning.

I don't recall the handgun being very effective, even the demon children took multiple shots so you were still mostly running away. The pickaxe took down even the gorilla/ape things in one hit but you had to be stationary..

Fam_Fam posted...

ok? he's entitled to his opinion. as I said, the RNC wrote a clarifying statement, which I have included here, that explicitly stated that they were not intending to describe the violent actors as being part of the legitimate political discourse.

whether or not you choose to accept the amendment is a personal choice, I suppose.

Included in which post?

@Fam_Fam
https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/593024-mcmaster-says-he-agrees-with-pence-that-trump-is-wrong-about-2020

Republican advisor to Trump also believes the RNC statement is referring to people that crossed the barriers and committed illegal acts

Background_Guy posted...

She's always lived in the US and will live in the US after the Olympics are done with. Most athletes have to give up American citizenship to compete for China but Xi might have made an exception for her? It's unclear.

Ahh thanks

Veggeta_MAX posted...

No, Harry could walk and shoot at the same time. RE characters couldn't do that for the longest time.

Which is why I mentioned the pickaxe... you don't get the hunting rifle till much later in the game, and the pickaxe is the first effective weapon but makes you stationary

Veggeta_MAX posted...

You can defend yourself in the first SH.

I mean once you get the pickaxe, but you are still stationary and exposed.. Harry Mason isn't a solider or cop etc, it even shows in the unstable game mechanics

SSJGrimReaper posted...

I feel like games where you can't defend yourself will always be more creepy and scary

Very true, that's why I preferred the first few SH to RE - I take it that's what Oultast/Amnesia are like?

Rathinor posted...

Yep, hes posting screenshots from the archive site having quite the cry. Also attempting to respond to people through the subreddit. That particular brand of crazy is a Tails trademark

Wait is he tails?

Tangential question - how does Outlast/Amnesia compare to Silent Hill? Same kind of creepiness?

Rathinor posted...

Hes now having a bitchfit about this topic on the CE subreddit

Another one?

Background_Guy posted...

Weird how she doesn't defend the uyghurs as they suffer violence due to their culture and heritage

(Also she's been competing for China for 3 years)

Sorry still missing a detail - did she move back to China after that attack? Or stay a resident and then compete for China?

I feel that's why so many influences on r/choosingbeggars just ask for free products

ExtremeLuchador posted...

My employers can remote in from off-site via internet at any time.

Can any public person watch your live stream at any time they wish?

In one sentence, what did she do? Grew up in the US and then moved to China and competed for them?

Fam_Fam posted...

because the impeachment is about the same thing being reviewed now. i'm saying its related (not the entire thing) because its an ongoing saga that those two peoples' names have been attached to. this censure relates to the entire string of events following from the initial reaction until now. they are saying its an ongoing issue that they are now getting punished for, starting from a year ago. this persecution, in their minds, started from then, and they are being punished for their role in this persecution, which in part, targets people who were only engaging in legitimate political discourse, and people who were onlysupporting the legitimate actions/behaviors, and then unfairly being attached to other things they had no part of.

Again, I'm asking you to support your conclusion as
A) Nothing in the language indicates them referring to the impeachment hearings
B) The committee is a more current topic
C) During the impeachment hearing, no mention was made about specific civilians who acted lawfully being persecuted (AFAIK, please correct me if I'm wrong).

The last point especially is salient - WHO are these people you claim they are defending? When were they persecuted?

_Stuff_ posted...

You actually misread his post.

It sounds like he was again claiming that Rogan hadn't influenced someone, not backing down on it.

Good point but there's a bit of nuance - he originally said "Nobody has changed their mind" (an affirmative about JR's influence) while this post is "I never claimed anyone was influenced" (an affirmative about what trapped did in his posts). Still I'm waiting/eager for him to back up either statement...

brotrrwinner posted...

Ah, so then I assume you know exactly what the terms of the spotify/Joe Rogan deal were and that he 100% positively broke them. In over 100 episodes. And only now they went "ops, we seemed to miss all these blatant breaches of contract! Silly us! Oh well, no biggie, let's just delete it now"

Which STILL isn't violating Freedom of speech, so why did you bring it up?

Natsu_Dragneel posted...

this was before we found out that cnn lied about ivermectin. or should i say "Fake News" there's a reason their ratings are going down.

Ehhh.. what was the lie CNN stated about Ivermectin? And how does it connect to Rogan?

brotrrwinner posted...

Spotify: *deletes over 100 episodes of Joe's podcast*

This fucking guy: "what free speech is being curtailed?"

How is a private company removing media a violation of "free speech" according to the first amendment?

ChainedChained posted...

Aren't black people among the lowest vaccination rate?

Did you separate race into political camp?

brotrrwinner posted...

When you see the common man afraid of free speech, you know we're fucked

Ok I'll bite - what free speech is being curtailed?

AngelicRadiance posted...

He pretends to have never been a Trumper now

And to never had opinions on politics...

Fam_Fam posted...

i'm not defending it, I'm trying to explain is based on what I understand of the situation. they explicitly separated out the people who broke into the capitol from those who were engaging in legitimate political discourse. that's all i'm trying to point out.

the reason why I'm talking about is that the initial backlash against those two in particular was a LONG time ago, stemming from the impeachment itself. they were talking about censure back then. note this article from...you guessed it, a year ago

https://www.npr.org/2021/02/06/964933035/wyoming-gop-censures-liz-cheney-for-voting-to-impeach-trump

this is all connected. this is not coming out of nowhere starting 3 days ago. the current 1/6 commission is clearly following up on the exact same thing from the impeachment as well, which is the "democrat-led persecution" they are referring to. these aren't isolated cases

I get that they (RNC) weren't happy back then and I remember them (the state party) censuring her back then for the impeachment hearing. What I'm asking is WHY you believe the recent censure is related to that when A) nothing in the language indicates it, B) there is a more recent event (the committee) pulling focus, and C) the state censure (that you linked) states Antifa and BLM were responsible, nothing about "legitimate political discourse".

trappedunderice posted...

The fact that you paraphrased in parenthesis about what I didn't type is nonsense.

I mean the fact that you claimed that is nonsense but here we are

trappedunderice posted...

I never claimed anyone was influenced by watching Rogan's podcast. Not one person I called out could provide proof that the people they claim had covid were directly influenced by joe to not take a vaccination. People that irrationally hate him in topics publicly I'm not going to take their story seriously.

I mean if you want to lie, I suppose that's your prerogative, but you definitely posted "No one has changed their mind because of Rogan" (paraphrased). Myself, Dark, and quite a few other posters in the thread provided statements to that effect, so claiming we didn't is just the worst form of gaslighting.

Do you believe people should take you seriously when you irrationally support him and downplay COVID in all of your posts about the subjects?

Humble_Novice posted...

Atmasabr is bitching again on Reddit.

What are they saying?

UndefeatedGOAT posted...

the person is saying rumble is right wing, it sounds like rumble is some sort of free speech platform, the person is showing originality by bashing the fash by saying its Nazi, i found it rather clever

I haven't looked at the platform, but if she is describing a pattern of it's users (Right wing and Nazis), how is that "bashing" it?

Correct_Facts posted...

Blocking people is the cowardly thing to do

So is not answering questions

UndefeatedGOAT posted...

remember in like 2007 when the liberals were the free speech people

How is his free speech being curtailed now?

DarkRoast posted...

Rumble is basically YouTube for Nazis

Flockaveli posted...

Rumble is like Parlor. Uncensored social media that draws plenty in the Alt Right.

Thanks, hadn't heard of it before

gatorsPENSbucs posted...

But Id rather spend those 2 seconds doing something I actually care about. People went into a building, people went to jail. Not sure what else Im supposed to know, or why Im supposed to know.

Also, you seem to know more about me than I know about myself. What am I having for dinner tonight? I wanna know if I should be excited or not.

Do you believe those people were jailed unfairly?

Fam_Fam posted...

their comments were towards the two representatives (Cheney and Kizinger) and previous statements they had made, not the current 1/6 committee, as I understand it. I think they are arguing that statements made during the impeachment (for which they both voted) presented ALL of the 1/6 as criminals/terrorists, whereas that was a small percentage of the entire group, most of which WAS peacefully demonstrating

Given that this censure was issued just DAYS ago, I don't see how you can ascribe it to actions taken a year ago? The "persecution" refers to the committee, right? What evidence do you have that it referred to the impeachment, given that no specific protestors/rioters were named or called during the impeachment? Really seems like you are reaching to defend the RNC statement....

Fam_Fam posted...

Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger crossed a line, Ronna McDaniel, the Republican National Committee chairwoman, said in a statement. They chose to join Nancy Pelosi in a Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens who engaged in legitimate political discourse that had nothing to do with violence at the Capitol.

Fam_Fam posted...

I think the suggestion is that when people blanket condemn January 6th protestors, that includes people who were also engaging in legitimate political discourse. i think that's what the committee is accusing them of (blaming the whole group when it was just a small subset of all protestors that engaged in criminal activity)

But the committee (AFAIK) hasn't done that, so why bring it up? Again, as soon as someone crossed the barricade (or even if they brought zip ties and weapons and stood outside) they aren't "peacefully demonstrating"

Correct_Facts posted...

Answer my question.

Which one?

trappedunderice posted...

Says the guy who wishes death death upon someone, gets modded and doubles down. I'm sure your a stable human being.

Says the guy who claimed not a single person had been affected by Joe Rogan in getting or not getting the vaccine.. and never provided any proof for his argument after asking for "facts" from everyone else

Ruvan22 posted...

For the sake of argument, let's say that statement is true - what does that have to do with Donald ripping up documents?

@Correct_Facts ?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Like... I was genuinely angry during that movie...why were the characters doing any of the stupid things they were? How was the adversary suddenly getting more powers?

gatorsPENSbucs posted...

And for the 100th time I dont have the slightest idea about any of that.

"Any of that" meaning you don't know what happened on 1/6/21?