Lurker > superman 2000

Conflict posted...

Yes, I "tucked tail and ran" because I actually had things to do

And yet you're here, right now, and have yet to address my calling out of your bullshit. You're just full of shit; own it.


---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Conflict posted...

Remember when you told someone earlier in this topic that they clearly weren't in a good place mentally?

Oh man that couldn't look any more ironic now

Oh, hello again. I see you tucked tail and ran when I called out your bullshit last time, so you're now reaching for the lowest hanging fruit to make some sort of "s-s-see, you ARE a bad person!" point. All the while, you're still ironically (but unsurprisingly) ignoring the attitude of every person I'm responding to. It's difficult to take someone like yourself seriously when your bias is so blatantly blinding that you can't even be objective in your observations and input.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

the0rebirth posted...

Damn. Savage.

Eh, not really. Just honest. I dont feel like entertaining the same lamebrain arguments over & over.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

Ahhh, the sound of someone who just cannot win the argument.

You are free to believe whatever you want. This topic is old, your argument is dated, and above all else, I just dont have any reason to care about what you think of me. Youre a faceless nobody on a video game messaging board. You could die right now and it wouldnt impact my world in the slightest.

So, pizza?


---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

I think you couldnt defeat the points made, so are now blatantly deflecting. Weird, that.

Oh, youre still not over that? Clearly I disagree and dont respect you enough to entertain the matter any further. Least you could do is recommend a delectable dish for my dinner desires.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

If this is the best you have, Guesswho33 could run circles around you mentally.

I wonder what I should get for dinner. Im torn between pizza and Chinese. What do you think?

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

Ive learned a long time ago its usually

Thats nice.


---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

Well, ONE of us doesnt, thats for sure. Considering past projection, however

You bore me.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

Similar thought processes at work. Late stage denial. Lack of awareness. Pushing the lie. When caught, project. Seems accurate to me when it pertains to you.

Youre not intelligent.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

I mean besides that time you directly contradicted yourself, then followed it up with a hypocritical post?

You dont know what contradiction means.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

Lmao that projection again. You think Trump still won the Presidency dont you?

Oof, bringing up Trump in a completely unpolitical topic? Uber cringe. Were done here.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

I got caught contradicting myself, so instead of attacking the point made, Im just going to attack the person.

I never contradicted myself. Begone.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

Ya, TOTALLY not your message lmao.

You're not intelligent.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

Only thing documented here is a grown ass adult crying because they took fake tits off a cartoon character. Bad look man.

I was wrong, but instead of admitting I was wrong, Im just gonna insult you.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

Your entire post premise is that because they took those boobs away they are trying to sexualize her less.

No, that is not my premise. As I just told you, the writers themselves said this. Since the rest of your response is based on this misunderstanding, it isnt worth addressing. Please pay better attention.


---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

How do you know? Were you in the room? No? Good to know lmao.

Its documented. Keep up; youre in a topic that has hundreds of posts, and are asking about things that were covered on the first few pages.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Tenlaar posted...

Okay, so are you upset about Bugs not wearing pants with a nice bulge in them to demonstrate that his rabbit body has a human dick?

Im not upset at all. Lola had boobs; now she doesnt. The rationale is that they wanted her to be less sexual. A character simply having boobs shouldnt automatically be seen as sexual; that sort of thinking carries problematic implications.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

daynlokki posted...

Do female bunnies have breasts? Ever think they might just be making her form closer to what actual rabbits look?

More bad logic. All of these characters are anthropomorphic; they talk, wear clothes, are bipedal, etc.. The creators didnt decide to just suddenly remove Lolas bosom because shes a bunny.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Tenlaar posted...

I'm not reading 400 posts, did anybody ask the TC if they're upset about not seeing Bugs' dick flopping around yet?

Bad comparison. Cartoon characters with boobs only have them if they can be covered. If Bugs Bunny had a duck, he would wear pants.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Heavy_D_Forever posted...

By misrepresenting what was tweeted. Which is exactly what you did in this topic.

Seriously. Like, what does it being a tweet have to do with anything? TC clearly made this topic with a deceptive title. I hate when people bullshit and play dumb.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

DirkDiggles posted...

Again, how do you twist a tweet?

The same way you twist any other set of words? By dishonestly quoting them?

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Jagr_68 posted...

There's still much irony to be found simply on the basis that she of all people is acknowledging that,

Which is why I dislike her. She's a fear-mongering grifter who helps keep Americans ignorant and hateful. Still, TC shouldn't have twisted her words.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

The Popo posted...

I dont care for her in the slightest, but youre obviously twisting her words

Is this the part where you get jumped for stating the truth?

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

I dislike Candace Owens, but this topic is dishonest. She said, "to politicians across the world," and then proceeded with the statement in the title. She's basically putting black people on game to this ugly truth as a wake-up call, because this is (supposedly) how politicians view them.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Y'all need to realize that perceiving someone as "weird" doesn't give you a pass to be an ass.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Conflict posted...

Bro how many times in this topic alone have you assumed somebody must be miserable or "not in a good place mentally" because they don't agree with your investment on this topic?

Zero. The only times I've said that are against people who were being rude and presumptuous, and if you were half as observant as you claimed, you'd see that there are plenty of people in this topic being needlessly rude and presumptuous. So yeah, gaslighting at its finest.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

l0gic posted...

Strawman is more about the actual argument being misrepresented; not so much the person, though I suppose I get why one could assume there's overlap. Conflict is definitely being dishonest about your character, but I'm not sure strawman is the best term to use...

I feel like if someone says "I like chocolate" and then someone else replies, "This guy is OBSESSED with chocolate -- what a weirdo!", that's a dishonest assertion meant to paint the first person in a bad light. Writing off my topic as an "obsession over something weird" is, at the very least, intellectually dishonest.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Conflict posted...

No, that's not a strawman. Like, not even close. A strawman would be me saying that you wouldn't be satisfied unless every anthropomorphic character in existence had boobs.

A strawman is a misrepresentation meant to make the person you're arguing with look less credible by attacking what they're not really doing. You took my topic and tried to make it seem like I'm just being obsessive over something weird, which is--you guessed it--an attempt to make me look more fallible, instead of addressing what I'm actually saying.

I also didn't say "you're the one with issues". You don't need to have issues to use coping mechanisms.

The very idea that me defending myself against rudeness is a "coping mechanism" shows that you're just tyring to be an ass and make it seem like I'm the one in the wrong. Don't act obtuse.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Conflict posted...

...That post had neither of those. Are you taking classes from professor UnfairRepresent on how to misuse terms?

Strawman = "you're obsessing over weird topics!"
Gaslighting = "are you sure YOU'RE not the one with issues, what with your constant self-defending from rude comments?"

Thanks for attending.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

creativerealms posted...

The perfect Lola is Looney Tunes show Lola.

I don't really want that to be the "definitive" Lola, but I must admit she worked really well for that series.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Conflict posted...

So is your gimmick to obsess about weird topics and then claim anyone who points out how weird they are must be miserable IRL? Is that an effective coping mechanism for you?

Nice strawman and gaslighting combo. Two fallacies for the price of one!

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

@l0gic , I believe you said in an earlier post that you're a woman, right? Not that it should matter, but it's always nice to have a woman's perspective on stuff like this lol besides that YouTube video I posted.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

l0gic posted...

Even if that was the case, you acting like a dick is far worse than TC just being weird. Makes you look very insecure.

He's probably a loser IRL and gets his rocks off by being a shithead online, lol you can't help those types; just gotta hope they one day find a better reason to live. Watch -- the next thing he'll say is, "you're the one obsessing over bunny boobs lolol" or some variation of such. He's more one-note than Lola Bunny herself. xD

On that note, looks like this topic is coming to a slow crawl. Ah well, 'twas fun while it lasted.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Doom_Art posted...

Ignore me all you like, I'll still make fun of you lol

Get better at it, please. You're not funny.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Doom_Art posted...

or rather, pretending to defend them, which is even weirder tbh

Seeing that this is AT LEAST the third time you've said some variation of "or pretending to be serious, which is even weirder", I think it's safe to say that you're just a broken record who wants attention. So yeah, gonna be ignoring you until you say something interesting.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

cjsdowg posted...

Here is the thing, I can see it both away.

I think the people who want to debreast her are wrong in this case. If pushes the idea that on has to pick between being a strong character and not looking like her . We see this a lot many times times people try to make a strong female character and they take out or down play the female bits.(so the speak).

It is not like a case where she was gratuitous in her looks . And for the people who want to bone her. There will still be many people who do. Julie Hops had the body of a Teddy Bear and there are still people who want to do her. (she is a dirty cop by the way).

So debreasting her doesn't stop people from wanting to do her and it sends a horrible message when it comes to the body positivity.

I mean she ain't like Powergirl who is supergirl but somehow breast are like 12 more pounds .

This is all I've been saying since post one. I appreciate your willingness to actually get the point and not just act like an obtuse asshole.


---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Kakapo posted...

Maybe you can use it to buy the life sized gadget cuddle pillow youve always wanted?

Just put in my two-week notice.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Doom_Art posted...

Nah, you're just defending your fetish.

That's why tons of people have said so to you ITT. It's obvious to everyone.

Sure. Whatever you say. Are we done here?

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Kakapo posted...

Sorry we cant all have silky smooth palms, Brosephine de Beauharnais

I'm gonna make a fortune at this rate.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Doom_Art posted...

I mean you're not tho, you just like arguing.

THIS JUST IN: You can like arguing AND be interested in other people's opinions! More at 11.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Doom_Art posted...

you've been arguing about tits on a cartoon bunny since yesterday afternoon

I created the topic; I'm obviously interested in what others have to say. You're just a rando lurking on a topic you clearly think little of, constantly repeating variations of "lol ur weird lol fetish lol unfunny condescension". Like, we get it already, ya one-trick pony. Now take a bath.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Doom_Art posted...

I mean we all have our fetishes, but it's weird to argue about your attraction to a bunny cartoon for 350 posts

Damn, you're STILL here? You must have literally nothing better to do with your life, lol

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Cobra1010 posted...

Heck I don't care about cartoons but I would bump this topic to read the arguments.

It's a bit like spidermans situation. Obvious walls and suit graphics downgrade. Less environmental objects.

Why dO yOU cArE AbOUt sOmE puddles? HErE I Add sOmE pUddLE stIckErs tO phOtOmOdE. HAhAhA.

Lotta people think not caring is cool, and opt to be sneering when they have nothing interesting to say.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Kakapo posted...

Sorry you cant rub the pud to a cartoon rabbit anymore TC.

Using black magic, my Cash App account now receives an automatic $5 donation every time someone makes this brain-dead comment.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

cjsdowg posted...

That is what some people here want to the with Lola.

HA! Clever.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Middle hope posted...

Why not? If it's a pg13 movie it can compensate for lack of depth in a character.

I actually didn't have a problem with Lola's mild sultriness, though I understand why some consider it problematic (perpetuates the idea that women have to have sex appeal). Personally though, I'm more interested in them giving her a more fun personality. I think the biggest problem with Lola Bunny has always been that she's not really a loony toon, despite being a Looney Tune. I don't mind her being one-dimensional -- most of the characters are -- but one-dimensional in the way of just being athletic and sultry is kinda boring.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Middle hope posted...

Just give her huge tiddies and she speaks exclusively in innuendo and slap a PG-13 on the movie.

Nah. Lola doesn't need to be sexualized at all.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Darmik posted...

So Sylvester and Pepe Le Pew are attracted to animals and Bugs is attracted to and I quote "essentially a human with bunny features."

Why?

It was fun while it lasted, Mr. Misogynist. Hope you work on that one day.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.

Darmik posted...

I'll do this again because I find this to be the most fun.

Why does Sylvester's wife look like this?



But Lola needs to have breasts?

This is the Penelope argument all over again. You're a broken record.

---

I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.