Lurker > LinkPizza

IAmNowGone posted...

whiskey Im almost certain winter is the only gay guy that has ever hit on you so dont worry this isnt some insidious plot to get in YOUR pants of all places lol

Im not even sure winter is gay. I think hes straight, but open to other stuff... AFAIK, at least...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Jen0125 posted...

It doesn't matter what he would have done. He didn't. He got a bj and she got nothing. Waste of time.

Im guessing TC didnt want it if she cut it short. Shes the one who decided to leave before getting it. Though it depends on if she even wanted that. I dont know about females, but I know plenty of guys who enjoy giving blowjobs more than receiving...

PrincessTheresa posted...

Now hes upset because he asked where I met him and I said, Craigslist. But he found out it was actually an Instagram account.

He attempted to log into it but I deleted it from another computer.

I mean, he already knew you cheated. Why lie even more?
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

I use to use polynesian until I had Chick-fil-a sauce. And I haven't gone back to polynesian yet...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Jen0125 posted...

He didn't he go down on you. That seems like a waste of time.

Maybe he would have. She did say they had to cut it short because her husband was calling...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

kukukupo posted...

I absolutely loved Zelda II back in the day. It was by far one of my most anticipated games.

I haven't played it in about 10 years or so - but I remembered still enjoying it. I don't understand the new wave of hate.

Its not really new hate for me. I tried it a long time ago. Never really cared for it. Tried it again. Nothing changed. I even tried it again when it first came back out on the switch online thing. Still a no go...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Final Fantasy2389 posted...

Did this even need a news story? Does anyone care that much?

Probably anyone who follows him, I would think. So, probably at least those 3 million people. Other than that, who knows?
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Yeah. I like it...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

All of them...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Pizza...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

I honestly dont know. I dont think I normally get stuff that I tip for on sale... I get deals on Pizza, but I dont really consider that a sale. I probably just give some random amount...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

frankly it wasn't THAT hard once you know some tricks and grind some levels, but its difficulty is imo the main aspect of it, if you make an easy remake it won't be the same, you can call it something else but not Zelda 2

I mean, it would still literally be Zelda 2. Just easier. Either way, its still crappy...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Ogurisama posted...

Thats why i want a remake, it has aged so poorly, it is one of the worse ones yeah

Even before it aged, it wasnt good...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Zelda 2 is actually one of my least favorite Zeldas...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

thedeerzord posted...

I understand this, but I still cannot advocate for the termination of that fetus.

Its still a human being that could still accomplish so much if it were to be allowed to live.

EDIT: Though if its still an illness that must be unbearable to live with, then I can still understand why

Or it could be a murderer, or the next Hitler. Or it could be someone who's completely average. Or someone who ends up hating life anyway. We shouldn't really say it should be alive or not because of all the stuff it could be... For all we know, the parent doesn't really want a kid, but keeps it because she gave birth to it, and ends up treated the child really bad, and making their life suck... I get what's you're saying. But that's really a roulette. And not even a really good one, tbh...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

thedeerzord posted...

Correction: Fetuses born 5 months after gestation are viable. They can survive if treated at a hospital.

Yeah. I know. 5 months is about 24 weeks. Its maybe like 2 weeks away or so. So, thats what I said. What are you correcting? The only thing I got wrong was saying 6 months. But thats because I miscalculated the weeks. (I did 24 divided by 4) but months are usually 30-31 days, so it was off a little)...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

is a fetus viable in month 8? do you think abortion shouldn't occur at month 8?

Those are two separate questions. If you asking me personally, Im fine with it. If you asking is the fetus viable, then the answer is most likely. Like I said, they can be viable at 24 weeks. Thats about 6 months. By 8 months, it should be pretty viable. Thats a preemie. And 9 out of 10 live.
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

so what you and scythe said is viable is also not viable because there can still be a miscarriage at month 9 or even at birth, according to the logic you are applying here no fetus is viable

No. And youre deliberately pretending not to understand. When talking about viable
In the capacity you asked about, its means could the fetus live if we took it out now. Its not about the full pregnancy, but the chances the fetus could survive on its own about birth if it happened right there. Which could be as early as 24 months (I think). If earlier than that, its said that it wont be viable. So, they arent talking about the full pregnancy in that case if there is a too early...

Wanded posted...

most humans didn't have rights for the majority of history, were they not human beings as well? was the first human being the first one to get human rights? there are a lot of third world countries with no human right, are they not human? is it okay to kill them because they have no human rights?

Except they were humans. They did have rights where they were. Though, some are still lacking. And in those cultures, you can sometimes kill the people that have no rights. It all depends on where it is, and what they did. It was when they were taken somewhere else.

And when the fetus is born and becomes a baby, its get the same rights as other humans. Thats when theyre a human and gain human rights.

Wanded posted...

i showed you the scientists and "experts" clearly say that the science is that a fetus=human being, you said they decide, well, then it is decided.

Yeah. Its been decided that theyre not humans yet...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

TheSlinja posted...

Etrian odessy

Yeah. As soon as I started the first area, thats what I immediately thought of...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

of course it does

https://i.imgur.com/ZijXbeO.jpg
I use this...

Wanded posted...

you're basically saying we should let scientists or "experts" govern us instead of self governance, get trump out of the white house, do away with elections and just let experts run it all

Science doesnt govern. Its educates. The people who govern are usually suppose to use that knowledge to run things, though some do ignore it... Like how Trump ignored experts about Covid...

Wanded posted...

there, the experts say i'm right, are we done here?

So, where are their rights? It seems like we still dont consider them humans.

Wanded posted...

i don't see what your point is, miscarriage is a natural death, if you can get nature to come to court and take the stand call me because i have a lot of issues with nature as well, but no one is talking about death by natural causes, we are talking about planned death by unnatural causes

The point isnt taking nature to court. The point is that you said all babies are viable if left alone. And thats false. Thats also not the argument, but one you made up. When talking about viability at first, you were asking what made it viable past a certain point to where doctors dont/cant abort. If thats the viability were talking about, then thata talking about viability of the fetus if taken out now. Not the viability of it all together, because that doesnt make sense in the same context. Because then there would be a question about viability. There is, meaning thats what theyre talking about...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

we can already see that though in western areas that have restricted abortion

think about it, according to that logic you might as well permit 3rd trimester abortions as well because "you're not actually banning 3rd trimester abortions, you're only banning the safe ones", but obviously you won't agree with that, it's the same

Actually, it could be different. When they banned all alcohol, people did all kinds of alcohol. But if someone banned just one type of alcoholic beverage, people may just drink the ones that arent banned. So, by banning only third trimester abortions, people may just get first and second trimester abortions. Where if you ban all of them, then people could possibly get any trimester abortions. There will always be outliers, but still...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Id say so.
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

that's an excuse for argument from authority, what is the scientific basis for that assertion?
also most doctors agree a fetus is a human being

The basis of the argument is given that they call it something different. And the fact that its not a human is based on it not having human rights. Its pretty simple. Also, appeal to authority only works if the authority figure isnt an expert...

Wanded posted...

that's semantics and i explained why, the fetus is always viable, all you need to do is not kill it to keep it that way, and again, it's completely irrelevant becaus ethey aren't gonna take the child out at 6 months so why does it matter

Because thats not what anyone is talking about. Even babies that eventually get miscarried are viable. My little brother that died during childbirth was also viable. Nobody is asking if the baby is viable like that. What they are talking about when they say its viable is if it would be able to live on its own outside the womb if it came out that instant. Not if it viable if no one messes with it. And honestly, youre still wrong. As I said, my little brother was viable inder your rules, and still died. So, your whole argument is irrelevant because youre not using the same definition of the word we are. When w43 talking about it, were talking about viability if it comes out now. Not viability if we wait for it to be born. Thats why they say its viable after a certain amount of time. You just acting dense for no reason...

Wanded posted...

i don't need to stop it, it's inevitable it will be stopped because society is already swinging hard to my side

Not they arent. Its about the same as its always been. And you side doesnt even care about human rights. You side tried to stop a 10 year old girl from getting and abortion. And she would have literally died without one. You side wants the government to control what a women does with her body. You side doesnt care about human life. Its wants to control human life, and punish women for having sex...

Wanded posted...

if abortion is illegal more women would simply not do it rather than risking an unsafe abortion

Some might not get one. Others still would. I mean, a lot of people still drank when alcohol was illegal and people were dying from making their own. Whos to say the same wont happen with this?

Wanded posted...

no one is talking about miscarriages

Except under your rules, those miscarries babies were also viable...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

ParanoidObsessive posted...

But wait. If it's spelled backwards, doesn't that mean it's like the opposite, and thus he's like totally not evil?

He did get rid of the not great heroes, right?
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Cant you still make it?
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

JOExHIGASHI posted...

That's more than 10 hours a day. How do you have time for anything else?

I eat while playing games. And I sleep for maybe like 6 hours a day. Even at 11 hours a day, thats only 17 out of 24 hours...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

it was initially illegal though, until recently.

Abortion was. But I still dont know if abortion was actually considered murder still. Not only that, but they were still learning. I mean, at one point, werent they literally putting women in mental institutions for having their period... Along with other stuff like Novel Reading, apparently... And even if (which likely wont happen) they make abortion illegal, it still doesnt make it murder...

Wanded posted...

you said earlier these things depend on the law, when they change the law to declare fetuses human and having human rights, will you accept that?

First, its if, not when. And the law wont change like that. And in the end, it wont matter. They are fetuses. Science has determined that. And science wont just change because of the law. Plus, the law has already determined that they are not humans. And just saying they are doesnt mean much since the evidence will show that its not. Evidence like how they dont need a passport, get child support before birth, count for things like welfare/food stamps as another child, etc... changing the wording of the law to discount science doesnt work. Especially when you cherry pick certain parts. Like calling a fetus a human, but not giving it those rights. And they wont give it those rights. They barely want to give women rights. So, no. I still wont.

Wanded posted...

viable - capable of working successfully; feasible.
unless the fetus died from complications, it's working as intended

And in this case, theyre talking about being viable if they took it out of the woman. You know that and are acting dense to try to prove some point that no one cares about... And you know that...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

FrozenBananas posted...

Yall really spending an entire work weeks worth of time on video games huh? 40+ hours?

Tbf, a lot of my playing time is at work...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Way more than 45... probably more than 70...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

She bi-racial, I guess...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Shes fun!
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

why not, you just said the law is the basis to your abortion stance, hence if the law changes it is supposed to change as well

Nope. Theyre changing the law that make abortion illegal. But it still doesnt make abortion murder. And fetus still dont get human rights until they are born...

Wanded posted...

it can survive from the first 1, all you have to do is leave it alone and not kill it, it's viable from conception, as long as you live it alone.

No its not. Youre not using viable correctly. People are talking about it being viable to take out of the woman. And its not viable to do that until at least 24 weeks (if its even that early). And not all of them, either... Thats what people are talking about when they say viable. You seem to be talking about something else...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

what makes it viable though?

Do you know what viable is? Viable in this case, means that the fetus will survive birth, and survive as a baby. I believe they can be like 80%-90% at maybe 24 weeks. I could be a little early there, though. It might be later. Of course, thats born early, but not induced, as far as I know...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

alright, so once the law changes and deems abortion is murder and fetuses have basic human right, would you accept that?

Nope.
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Oh look. Dante Colle. I know him. I like seeing him with a dick in his ass...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Someone get mudkip_viking and their pure blood in here...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

wolfy42 posted...

You should not force people to do things they do not want, and that sadly includes giving birth. If you feel it is murder, put the burden on those who do, and pony up money to pay for women to give birth to unwanted babies (again with the caveat of getting tubes tied, and having it only be once per woman etc). That would prevent most abortions right there (sadly it might encourage some to actually get pregnant for the pay day, so it's not a perfect solution).

The tubes tying thing is a little much, too, tbh. Especially since they probably wont cover the cost to get it undone when theyre ready to have kids. Not to mention, some abortions are done not because they dont want kids, but because they wouldnt be able to take care of a child with special needs (whether financially or otherwise)...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

again, on what basis? who decided the fully developed baby 5 seconds before birth is not human but the one 5 seconds after birth is?

The law, I guess. Since abortion literally isnt murder. Not to mention, it doesnt get any rights than humans have until its born. So, its not a human until its borne until then, its a fetus and nothing more...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

I don't want a wedding...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

wolfy42 posted...

I've known people who swear by crisco lol.

I pretty much just always bought water based lube. Works on everything. Lasts along time. Isn't very messy etc.
I get that other stuff is cheaper, but I have never really gotten trying to save a buck or something when having sex (Same with condoms with strangers etc). It's like, is sex not worth spending a couple dollars to you? Seriously?

Most of the time, we have lube. Though, they have been so spontaneous moments. And stuff like that.
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

WhiskeyDisk posted...

and yet, it was specifically stated in my 6th grade sex ed many times that vaseline is petroleum based and eats latex...so there's that.

True. But I wasn't thinking about a lube AND condom. I was thinking of the lube part. Which it can work as. And does. I've used it. Not to mention, I don't even use condoms. So, I don't know it if eats through it.

WhiskeyDisk posted...

WD-40 is a lubricant but i'm not going to spray it on my cock.

No. But it's not made for human skin. Vaseline is made for human skin, though. So, it makes sense where WD-40 does not. And like I said, it does work well... I'm not sure WD-40 would actually work well... But the comparison doesn't work...

WhiskeyDisk posted...

you can use butter or bacon grease for all it matters if you're going anal or don't care about protection.

So people have. I've heard Crisco, too. But that's like emergency situation. We have Vaseline, though. So we used it... multiple times...

WhiskeyDisk posted...

i can't imagine how any male has never heard of a fractured penis.

I would say it's a lot. But IU can definitely see some. Plus, men probably know you can hurt it, but breaking is an usually term for it... So, I can understand the confusion for some people...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

We'll be waiting if you want to open up again...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

I can't believe I missed a boxer pic...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

wwinterj25 posted...

I've used wwinterj in almost every online username. That was however taken so I stuck 25 at the end of it.

I remember when I tried to make a username, I tried LinkPizza, but it was already taken. So, I made another account. As it turns out, I was the one who had taken the username LinkPizza and had forgotten... Haha...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

WhiskeyDisk posted...

what? every question on this test was literally middle school sex ed 101. like if you didn't ace this test, you should probably keep your dick in your pants-level stuff.

Some of them were cheap, though. Like Vaseline can be used as lube. And personally, I don't use condoms. So I have no idea how strong they are. And I can understand some people not knowing about penis breaking...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Unbridled9 posted...

You realize that a lot of people on the right feel the same way when it comes to things like freedom of speech and the second amendment, right? Are you going to defend those rights else they take away another right next? Don't go telling me that abortion is a right and freedom of speech and bearing arms aren't when the latter two are in the bill of rights while the former is not.

Sure. I never said I was against guns. Nor have I tried to take them away from people. I also do believe in free speech. Though, like others have said, "Freedom or speech" is not "Freedom of consequences". But I would be against it if someone tried to take away freedom of speech or the second amendment... I don't even know what gave you the impression I wouldn't fight for those...

Unbridled9 posted...

Who are you to decide that for a state that's not your own?

I don't decide. But I think it's dumb when a women have to give up the rights to her body just because a state is against it. I don't think the state should choose. I think a woman has the right to choose...

Unbridled9 posted...

I suppose I should make my own stance clear. I am pro-life. I also recognize that the question of when life begins is one that cannot, nor should it, be resolved by a court decision. As such I'm willing to compromise with the pro-choice and do things like accept first-trimester abortions and the like. However I feel that there has become a distinct RIFT in the pro-choice group between two parties. One which is pro-choice (having the option for medical conditions, early pregnancies, and the like but against things like third trimester abortions) and one which is pro-abortion (basically unrestricted abortions). I'm willing to talk to, and compromise with, the former but the latter is unreasonable and unacceptable in my eyes.

Personally, I'm pro-choice. I'd rather women make their own choice. As for when they have the abortion, I don't really care. I think they should have a reason why. And I don't think they should wit unnecessarily. I also know that there could be many reason on why they had to wait, or that something could have possibly changed last minute, as well. Like the sudden death of a spouse, or something new found with the baby. Either way, I don't think their rights should be taken away. And I think they should get the abortion as early as possible. But I still think late abortions can be fine. Because I'm not going to tell someone whether their reason is good or not...

Wanded posted...

if i drive in a car at night and see something enter the road right in front of me, might be a human, might be a dog or some other animal, might just be something the wind moved, isn't the only correct choice to stop the car?

Depends on everything else happening. Maybe stopping the car would cause an accident, for example...

Unbridled9 posted...

If a court rules that life begins at birth and not before than the attacker is not guilty even if the mother was eagerly awaiting the delivery of her baby.

He's not guilty or murder, but still has assault with a deadly weapon and possibly attempted murder, as well...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Wanded posted...

a fetus has the genetical dna code of a human, it is a human

Not until it's born, it's not...

Unbridled9 posted...

Yes. Your point? Only a small portion of pregnancies end in abortion and, of those, they tend to be concentrated into an even smaller subset. I.E if there are 1,000 pregnancies a year then 10 of them end in abortion. Of those 10 only 5 are first timers with the other five being concentrated into a group of women who have repeat abortions. I don't see what's wrong with that.

Except you said, "it tends to be concentrated into a small selection of repeat-aborters." But that's not true as half of the ones aborting are actually first timers. In 2017, there were over 860,000 abortions. So, following that logic, So over 460,000 were most likely first timers. Maybe in small percentage-wise at one percent, but it's also still quite a large number. And the small selection or repeat abusers makes up less than half of the abortions.

Unbridled9 posted...

I do not recall citing an article in my post.

I wasn't talking about the one I read...

Unbridled9 posted...

Well first off, no. Even if every woman in the U.S. got pregnant this year and 49% of them got abortions and the other 51% carried to term they'd still be a minority so unless something really insane is happening in the U.S. my statement is almost certainly true... But more to the point it's fairly well known that abortion clinics struggle to stay open at times due to a lack of customers. Simply put, there aren't enough women seeking abortions in the area to keep clinics open. So clearly only a small number of women even utilize the service.

It would be a minority for that year. But people can get pregnant more than once. And in different years, as well... Meaning that it could end up affected most of them over time. Not only that, but it still affects all women since we have taken their control of their body away. No matter whether they want the baby or not, they have to have it. So, it still affect them because they can't get a legal abortion... So, it most likely won't be true. The only reason it affects less women is because the rate has been dropping since like forever. Though, that might just be the US... And I don't think it's because they are seeking it, but because some states keeping banning it, or making women jump through hoops to get one.

Unbridled9 posted...

How so? These women used contraceptives and, as has been noted, contraceptives don't have a 100% effectiveness rating. That doesn't mean they are ineffective however and a woman can't have an active sex live, use contraceptives, and not get pregnant. After all, if a woman uses contraceptives then doesn't get pregnant the statistic doesn't get recorded. So what's your argument here?

I never said they were ineffective. Earlier, you made it sound as though it was mainly because they weren't using contraceptives enough, then we would get rid of the unwanted pregnancies. But maybe I read that wrong. That being said, nearly half of pregnancies are unwanted. And many may have been wearing contraceptives. Especially since I think the article had mentioned only 11% of women weren't practicing contraception...

Unbridled9 posted...

I don't recall the question of if it being a right or not being part of the question. If you believe that it is and it is something important to you go ahead and vote for it. If you believe it isn't and it's something important to you, go vote against it. My point is that the left is intentionally using it to whip it's voting base, specifically the young female demographic, into a voting frenzy to vote for them regardless of the candidate and to try and grow their power-base. It only affects a small portion of the population at best (especially since half the population can't get pregnant and a sizable portion of the other half is pro-life) but can be easily utilized to whip the entire base up over fear that may be completely unfounded.

The reason I mentioned it being a right is because you said, "If it's a right is debatable at best". But I disagree and say it is a right. As for population, it can't affect all of them at once. That doesn't mean it won't affect them later. Some females can get pregnant, or can't get pregnant yet. That doesn't mean it won't affect them once they're older, though. Not to mention, that for women having abortion, apparently 6 out of 10 are already mothers. So, even the people who have had kids go to get abortions, as well... So, it could end up affect all women. But just in different years. Seeing as women are different ages, and there will always be some who are too old, and some who are too young. Just because it doesn't affect the old ones anymore doesn't mean it didn't affect them when they were younger.

Unbridled9 posted...

I mean, think about it, you don't have a CLUE who Biden would put forwards to fill the slot assuming it doesn't get filled and he wins. For all you know he could pick a horrible, corrupt, judge who doesn't care one bit for the law or anything and shills the party line. He could pick a candidate that is pro-life for various reasons both good and bad. Yet people are now in a frenzy over it and the left is doing their best to push the message that, if Trump pushes through his candidate (likely Amy), America may as well rename itself 'The Republic of Gilead'.

He could. Though, it I'm being honest, I still trust him more than Trump... I'd at least give him a chance...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

papercup posted...

What the fuck Game Freak?\

They put the freak in Game Freak...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

Cobalt_Wasps posted...

i honestly thought you picked it by mashing the keyboard, because those keys often come up when mashing

Because of keyboard hand placement? Because I kind of thought that, too...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

I like Link, and I like Pizza...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.

BeerOnTap posted...

Which should at the very least be when the baby has a beating heart.

Can't that happen at like 5-6 weeks? That's barely enough time to find out you're pregnant in some cases...
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.