Lurker > ChuckSDeuces

YonicBoom posted...

Your thread some days ago inspired me to start self-study in hopes of doing the same some fine day.
I have nothing else to contribute to this thread. Carry on.

Kinda this. I'm thinking of taking some courses at my CC this fall on Network Administration

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

CosmicShadows posted...

7up.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

gloBal enemy posted...

yep, wait until you check out the secret ? perks.

I wish I could get my virginity back but I'm nowhere near ? Block :(

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

CalypsoDoom posted...

Its painfully unfunny

Spotted the husband

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

They're not scared to be in public and social situations so they take their time.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Probably, but people eat it up.

My friend for like two years now has made a post on facebook about how he bought his girlfriends husband a Nintendo Switch and he loves it and leaves them alone so it's his big recommendation for parents to shut their kids up and he gets a lot of laugh reactions.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

I've heard of enemas but not literally sucking shit out with a tube.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Not only did they send recruiters, they tried to forcibly get us to give our addresses away for paperwork.

They brought some sort of obstacle course things for PE classes my freshman year of highschool, this would have been around 2004-2005. In order to do it, you had to sign some "waiver" but the waiver required your address and phone number. I told them I didn't want to do it and I'd just run the mile instead. Nope, the PE instructor said I *had* to do it or I'd fail. I told him I wanted to call my parents.

It was a big thing and apparently he was talking out of his ass and got in trouble for it. I assume he was getting some kind of monetary kick back for how many names/addresses/numbers he could get for them to hound. Funny enough, I never got recruitment calls while most of my friends did. The most I ever got was a few "think about joining!" mailers from the Marines.

Besides that little incident, I do believe they had a few recruiters set up a table in the cafeteria during lunch. I think that only happened like once a year.

Edit: We also had an Airforce ROTC program but they were actually pretty chill.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

WallStreetWolf posted...

There's nothing generic about it. The premise of the game could be seen as generic and done before, but the writing does something incredible would it leading to an emotionally devastating climax, a moral choice left to discuss and talk about forever

The Last of Us strengths were almost entirely based on the acting. The writing wasn't horrible, but nothing outstanding either. It also didn't really use the medium to tell the story in an interesting way, which is something Kojima does to get around his lackluster writing.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Also when I'm talking about "the trend" I'm talking purely putting so much stock into visuals and surface level "deep" storytelling.

The more that becomes a trend, the more gaming suffers. We're not actually there yet, but people see it as a very real possibility and fear it.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

SwayM posted...

...this is the complete opposite of what I believe.

It's not that games can't be cinematic, but there's a clear line between doing it right and doing it wrong.

Rockstar is on a good path but they're still fine tuning it. I'd also say Sony Santa Monica are also on the right path with how God of War turned out.

Naughty Dog is on the bad path where the "quality" improves only in the visual sense but the gameplay suffers. Shit like The Order was also the bad side of it.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

It holds gaming back as a whole when it becomes a trend.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

EricDraven59 posted...

creepy uncle joe

Use this one, it's way better




---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Probably cause that one thing is all anyone brings up where as Biden has a shit ton of pictures.

It helps to use a little variety when it comes to Trump.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Every 4th of July celebration in my area was cancelled a month ago.

I'll probably just go to one of the non democrat counties and celebrate tho

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

soulunison2 posted...

what the fuck

Everyone has to learn sometime. The important thing is that now you know and hopefully it's good enough to work for you.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

soulunison2 posted...

wait is that a thing

Yes

Click "Change Color" at the bottom of the page

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Meanwhile, my Xbox One freezes on start up and Microsoft legit tells me I need to unplug the fucker to clear the cache or something

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

BakonBitz posted...

Considering these are kids' cartoons highly stylizing and dramatizing scenes from the movies in all sorts of directions I think it's hilarious that someone nerd-raged so hard in making those images, lmao.

Right?

Like, I'm not fan of what Disney is doing with Star Wars. But shit like this, even if it was being done in the way they think, is like worth an eye roll at most. Nobody should be taking the time of making all these images and videos and such.

Like what happened to our generation that makes them so damn dependent on their dumb entertainment? So Star Wars is ruined for you? Why not just...find something else to enjoy? Wouldn't this be a better use of time?

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Bullet_Wing posted...

It's completely false though. Anyone who actually believes Trump cares about the working man needs to get their head checked

But it makes them feel good.

You don't get it, people are dumb and impressionable.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Imagine being in over 30 and watching USA Pro Wrestling

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

The vast VAST majority of people support a president not based on policy, but how they make them feel.

Trumps "America First" attitude and constant glorification of the working man (on top of his lip service to churches) makes a lot of people feel good, thus they support him.

The same thing happened with Obama tbf. A lot of people supported Obama administration simply because they made them feel smart. Those people didn't give a shit about any of his scandals like Fast and Furious, the surveillance push or the over use of drone strikes.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

DeadBankerDream posted...

Wait, are you a proponent of the patheticness of the image you posted, or were you being sarcastic?

I thought you were sarcastic, but now I dunno.

I mock anyone who takes Star Wars too seriously.

I can still recognize how they constantly have to try and prop Leia up more than she needs to be. So in this instance I don't view this as some feminist agenda push, it's just more of Disney's pathetic attempts to try and boost a character who happens to be female. I will still mock the hyperbole and over drama of the image though.

Edit: And it turns out that I may be wrong and they do this with *every* character in these shorts, so it's just a style thing. And if that's true than *shrug* I still think they really prop up Leia more than they need to but guess I'm wrong in this case.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

UnfairRepresent posted...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lM7_oyCZqj0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUtvZLDfEhA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wetf5gajXM8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkC-e8ELAt0&list=PL3tjh_BCNnQ_WRlyEH_k0ig0LzvkEhqoP&index=57

Red Letter Media presents... Previously Recorded! A channel mainly starring Rich Evans and Jack from RLM doing some gaming action

Might want to tell RLM that.

RLM has also said that Jack is a guest contributor but not a core member of the team.

Why do you take so much pride in always being so so fucking ignorant and wrong?

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

DeadBankerDream posted...

This is so much worse than Greedo shooting first, cause women have vaginas.

I'm more annoyed at how Disney has completely over done everything with Leia since Carrie Fisher passed tbqh. It wasn't needed she was already a strong, good female character.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

some incel didn't get the memo that the Force is FEMALE

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

lmfao

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

UnfairRepresent posted...

He's still RLM dude. He's doing stuff with them right now and has for years

He flat out has said he isn't RLM though.


---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Both

My Toyota Tacoma is automatic, but my mustang is a manual.

It's hilarious when guys are like "Can you even handle that?" and then I ask if they can even drive it and they can't.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

I wish people would stop referring to Jack as RLM

Dude isn't RLM, kinda sucks and honestly even if you like him he is trying to make his own brand.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Fucking good

I was sick of having to ignore everyone who did them

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Please tell me you're only like 21 now

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Questionmarktarius posted...

"Nerdy" sites don't have value. The audience has a vastly higher than average use of VPNs and adblockers.

Well my post was mostly in jest but you are aware that the majority of users on this site are normies who don't even touch the forums right?

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

This is a refreshing take on the matter, for sure.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

This is a CNET thing.

They're wanting to pretty the site up to try and raise it's value before they sell it.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

laid

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

I told you guys to bitch out the people crying for a stricter TOS but nooooooo

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Is this the teen Harpie was harboring?

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

I tried dominoes for the first time a few weeks ago. It was just okay and I felt sick a few hours later

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Not his Brain
His Heart

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Madden 2025

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

VanananaHeyHey posted...

It's not worth taking off between short errands, dingus.

Give some of them a break, neets don't understand the concept of errands.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

look at all these idiots who er 'fraid of some 'rona! Ya'll just gotta git out der and git r done!

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

This is such a weird fucking take

Most of the time, they're probably just forgetting to take it off because they're not absolute pussies who can't breath through a mask.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Or was this always a thing I'm just seeing now?

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Jshipp24 posted...

The last Jedi was a almost pointless movie that had half the movie deal something that ultimately didn't even matter and had a open ending that didn't really lead up to much and had the main cast in the same situation they were in at the start.

Marry Poppins cameo too

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

A user accused me of being alt right, I accused him of being a man child.

Guess which one of us got modded?

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

Christian RULES posted...

But TROS had flying stormtroopers

They fly now?

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.

LNSS posted...

It was the best because it was the only entertaining one out of the sequels. The only dumb part was the lightspeed ram.

It wasn't though

It was super boring

And Canto Bight was dumb as fuck.

So was the no fuel space chase.

---

Engaging with NPCs is conceptually identical to talking back to the television.