Lurker > thanosibe

Mitochondriagon posted...

Don't see how this is still going on. If you are a male and you willingly suck dick with no kind of stipulation other than you want to try it out, you are gay or bi. That's it.

Yes.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

FrozenXylophone posted...

You say while behind a computer.

Then tell him to his face instead of hiding behind your computer.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

In a thread egged on by TC that devolves into stereotyping all police as racist bitches (among many other derogatory things) by multiple users instead of staying on topic about the incident in the OP gets locked?

captainkirksurprisedmeme.jpg

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

CyricZ posted...

His teacher.

It's an unethical power imbalance issue.

So at 42 if I decide to go college and get a degree and find one of my professors is a hot af 56 year old milf, I am incapable of turning down or accepting her advances, as were are both adults, without it being an imbalance of power? As in simply because she is in a position of authority all my abilities of consent are negated?

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

I don't need them. It's really pretty difficult to get suspended if you are not actively trying to do so. I got suspended one time, checked the ToU, found the punishment apt, accepted the moderation and took a break from CE for a few days. People that need alts know exactly what they are doing on this site.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Omasitor Hain posted...

The opposite of enlightenment. "Muh obscure media!!!!"

This. The opposite of people that think theyre somehow cultured because they watched Stranger Things before it was popular, listen to underground music, and value themselves based on these unimportant things.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Questionmarktarius posted...

It looks like it's still turn-based, or at least has an option to be, just with that meaningless chip damage going on in the meantime.

Maybe I need to check out some newer videos then. The last one I saw made it look like it plays like DMC and their option for turn based also wasn't ATB. It's more of an action oriented RPG. And that, for me, is the core of old FF games.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Questionmarktarius posted...

whut

Games are interactive. If the game's battles and interaction with enemies is completely different than the OG than it's two different experiences, regardless of the story itself.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Questionmarktarius posted...

Looks like the only substantial difference is everyone running around and doing meaningless 'chip' damage during a fight.

Is not the actual gameplay the experience itself. That the story will follow the original is meaningless. Its how you interact with the game not that the remake is just a pretty rehash of the original. At least to me. Maybe gamers now want interactive movies for games.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

saspa posted...

FF 8 is not like 7 at all. It's basically a card game wrapped around a jrpg sidestory. The junction system is intolerable without knowing triple triad, but if you do excel at triple triad then even the level scaling of the game won't bother you because you'll never need to level again because you'll have encounter-none ability the entire game like me.

I never once played the card came. Didn't in FF9 either, and had no problems finsihing either game with any more or less level of difficulty than FF7. If anything getting the hidden materias in FF7 made it easier of a game than FF8 or FF9. The only thing I didn't accomplish without Hero Drinks (?) through the card game was the Omega Weapon. The optional one in the castle (?). Sorry its been a while since I played it. Lol

And I honestly didn't see much difference in GF's/junctioning/drawing than materia and leveling up. They're different but basically the same and both yield the same end result. Or at least that's how it seems to me.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

DarkRoast posted...

18 yo doesn't make her a predator. Just unethical in her position.

It's weird. We got a thread right now on CE advocating that a 7 year old boy is capable of deciding to transition to female, but this 18 year old boy can't consent to a sexual relationship with an older woman? :thinking:

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Now. It looks like the "remake" is only a remake in that they kept Final Fantasy 7 in the title. The games are going to be two completely different experiences.

Also FF8 is a great game. If you like it, the junction system isn't much different than materia system.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

That was right before she fought Vega yeah? I think I actually have that on VHS

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Shablagoo posted...

1Nfamous couldnt. The universe would shatter. Its a physical law of nature discovered by Isaac Newton that 1NfamousACE_2 of gfaqsdotgspotdotcom cannot perform a sexual act with another man (hes NOT GAY, you see).

I think you might to take a break from CE if this is something you actually clicked "post new message" for.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Celestial_Red posted...

Most of those pictures were made publicly available to begin with, whether it was from themselves or from other sources. Wikifeet actually doesn't allow pictures that were shared privately to be posted in the galleries.

Oh I get that once you put yourself out there, it's all game. One of the reasons private stuff like that between my wife and I are usually not digital so that doesn't even happen by accident. Just weird to me is all.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Celestial_Red posted...

I'm guessing it's a reaction to sites like Wikifeet, which is somewhat notorious, and some women have even managed to get their own pages removed from the site (such as Winnie Harlow).

What makes that site creepier than other fetish stuff is if this gal had to get her page removed from the site there's obviously creepy foot fetish guys posting pictures of her and other women's feet without their consent.


---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

DarkRoast posted...

He's explaining bi-curious

Bisexual, homosexual, heterosexual. Those are the opinions. Anything else is just deflection. Be with who you want to be. Fuck peoples judgements.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Tf? Ju-On is probably one of scariest modern horror movies and I dont believe in ghosts/spirits or an afterlife.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

konokonohamaru posted...

Galaga

(it was at a laundromat)

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Pogo_Marimo posted...

Cool, good for you. Not really relevant here.

Cool good for you. Not really relevant here.

Am I doing it right? The dismissive shit posting?

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

RchHomieQuanChi posted...

Idk man, as a straight man, I've never said "You know what? I wanna try sucking dick."

Well yeah because youre straight

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Lost_All_Senses posted...

I think some people think weedsmokers just act like weed is the holy grail. Ignorance run rampant

Not only did I not use absolutes in regards to people that use pot; this retort negates nothing of what I have said.

I've only know many pot users to be defensive of their drug of choice unlike anyone else with any other drug. Excuse me if I want to teach my children a balanced view of recreation drugs, and not someone with an inherit bias despite the known facts and testimonies from former users about the use of pot.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

The real issue with telling kids weed isnt dangerous is theyre going to find out the hard way that its not miracle drug with no side effects that proponents like to prop it up to be.

Its almost like theres a balance. Which I know is crazy for some people to grasp.

Dont let shit posters on the internet and friends at school teach your children about drugs. Because they wont get the right information.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

In just the amount of time/money I've put into the game, easily either Warframe or Breath of the Wild. Warframe might edge out in money spent, but both are pretty equal in hours spent.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

R1masher posted...

I Just typed up a great response but deleted it because its not that serious

I read a lot of threads and a lot of times I might have a response but then its like why try, Im probably going to get youre so shook or some juvenile shit like that because so many people here are needlessly aggressive and abrasive over even the most innocuous things that actual controversial subjects arent worth wasnt my time.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Darmik posted...

Yeah why would a company make a sequel to one of the highest rated games of all time that went on to sell 13 million copies and is still a big seller today.

Really baffles the mind.

And managed to sell it successfully on two different systems. I am sure I am not the only one that bought if first on the Wii U and after getting a Switch bought it again.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

No one can honestly not like this song. Even if its unironically as you kids say.



---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

What the James Blunt song?

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Is Alfredo sauce on ravioli an actual thing? :vomit:

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

CableZL posted...

@thanosibe
The term came from signs posted that "colored people" had to leave town by sundown. Essentially, the towns were generally inhospitable to people of color in the daytime. At night, though, your safety is much more at risk if you're a person of color.

Ah ok, thanks. I had not heard that term used before.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Zikten posted...

what a dumbass. nobody saw Adam and Eve. also, one could argue the dinos ARE in the bible. it meantions "there were giants in those days". also something about a massive creature at one point. I forget the name. Leviathan for sea and ????? for land. the ???? might be a T Rex for all we know. I just can't think of the land creature's name

Behemoth. Though tbf both are just generic descriptors. But I do agree that if the Bible said anything about dinosaurs that would been about the closest it came to a mention.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Lost_All_Senses posted...

It is. That's why they gotta make topics about it and try to convince themselves it's better. We back pocket guys don't gotta seek validation

Yeah. I'm not too sure about these younger generations. They seek validation over the smallest things that to most normal people are innocuous. I guess the boomers really did ruin society for them.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

The Top Crusader posted...

Yeah I can't justify putting the well-being of my family in jeopardy, but I'd earnestly be looking for another job.

This is what I did when I found out the company I worked for did unethical things I didn't want to be a part of. I always refused to be directly responsible or taken part of any product that I knew wasn't made to API safety standards. But I knew eventually it would get me fired so I earnestly looked for a new job and eventually quit.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

@CableZL What are sundown towns? I'm legitimately curious as I agree with every other sentiment of your post.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Well Im a fan of things that help us progress as a society. So I guess Ill vote the first option in the poll.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

CanuckCowboy posted...

Alcohol is physically addictive and the withdrawal can kill you if youre a serious enough alcoholic.

Weed is not physically addictive.

Thats a massive difference even if people want to pretend its not. Of course weed can be addictive. Damn near anything can be.

Hell the dude who invented Carolina reapers basically traded his drug addiction for a hot food addiction

The severity of the withdrawal is a valid point. But it doesn't negate that pot is an addictive drug. And pretending it's not because it's withdrawals are on different level of other recreational drugs is just as dishonest and irresponsible as a dealer giving someone a "free sample" of a drug because they know they'll be coming back for more.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Philoktetes posted...

but it's not addictive!

The discussion of pot on this forum is always so circular. (But entertaining.) Pot advocates on CE would like you to think that pot has zero negative affects and isn't addictive at all. The big bad government is trying to keep them from pot because it's a "dangerous" drug but alcohol and tobacco are legal. But as someone has already pointed out that is not the case why it is not federally legal.

Then you got the people fear mongering as if pot is a worst drug ever. Literal refer madness nonsense.

Also, I can go a week without smoking with only minor discomfort, does not mean it is not addictive. I can go without drinking for a week too with only mild discomfort. Just because I don't get the shakes or tremors doesn's mean I am not having withdrawal. And toting that as meaning pot has no side effects or isn't addictive is irresponsible.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

OpShaft posted...

Only with hotcakes

Thats the only way they came in my day. But I aint eaten a big breakfast in forever. If I want to eat my breakfast with a knife and fork McDonalds is the last place Id go.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Tf is going on in this thread?

I think I've had enough internet for today already.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski

Well thats not good. But hey. Its progress.

---

I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski