Lurker > Ruvan22

Kazi1212 posted...

Clearly we all havent killed someone, so he obviously cant mean that.

He doesnt. He was talking about driving on the wrong side of the road, when you travel internationally.

I remember that topic. Good to know what she's healthy and happy.

dotsdfe posted...

"ladder cat is watching you masturbate"

I don't support identity politics when anyone uses it, but it's funny how upset the Left gets when the Right uses one tactic of theirs, and they can''t say anything about it without revealing themselves. The Left regularly weaponizes people's demographics (like Greta, whoever. "think of teh children!1!!11").

I can't forget how the Christchurch shooter made a very subtle troll in his manifesto about how inspirational she is and how he looked up to her (because the Right fully knows she has never had a unique thought in her head)

Shuto-uke posted...

You know what would have been a good ending?

Once the ambulance hit the cop car to rescue the joker he does his little dance and then he escapes with the help of the rioters, setting up the story for a life of hiding and crime for the clown prince of crime (even if there is no joker 2 because it's a one off)

This is actually what I was expecting to happen. I thought maybe somehow they knew he was in the car and were intentionally trying to bust him out and crown him their new messiah. They didn't appear to be aware that he was though.

What happened afterward kind of leaves the movie open to interpretation because it implies that none of what happened for the duration of the movie was even real. Arthur was in the asylum the entire time, and everything that happened to him was just a psychotic delusion.

i wonder if she's a virgin

A Joker cinematic universe sounds terrible.

A Gotham cinematic universe could be interesting.

CNN is fake news, both the left and the right recognize this

Ruvan22 posted...

karlpilkington4 posted...

Ruvan22 posted...

karlpilkington4 posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

karlpilkington4 posted...

Not really, if you're sending aid to someone you need to make sure the country and its leaders aren't corrupt. Small delays shouldn't be suspicious.

You did this in the other topic too.

You pick out 1 thing, ignoring everything else and then go "Well this one thing isn't illegal/suspicious" or "This 1 thing is hearsay (most things are hearsay)"

And it's bizarre.

In this case it's not even true. Both the funds being frozen without reason and the funds suddenly being delayed the moment they were unfrozen are suspicious as fuck by themselves.

They are not reflected in the US relations with any other nation. There are plenty of nations the US sends aid too that are unquestionably corrupt. Such as Saudi Arabia for example.

And the president never gave reason for why the funds were frozen or delayed in the first place, while overruling the other 2 branches of government to do so.

That's suspicious before the Rudy/Barr/Phone Call/Whistleblower shit.

For one, I'm not picking 1 thing and ignoring the rest. Not sure why you'd just make up a blatant lie. And there is reason to delay the funds. Trump already explained it. He was investigating corruption and making sure the country isnt supporting Russia. You simply don't like that answer.

But you are? You don't respond to the rest of his points?
Also, where did Trump say "I'm delaying it to make Ukraine isn't supporting Russia"?

I responded to his points in the other topic, and I responded to his points in this topic.

there is another possible explanation for the temporary suspension of aid. At the time, Ukraine was transitioning to a new, democratically-elected government and a review of the aid may have been justified under such circumstances.

https://www.apnews.com/94fdeaddc6b34c02b97278674b87541e

President Trump on Wednesday linked his decision to delay U.S. military aid to Ukraine to concerns about high levels of corruption in that country, and especially to frustration that the Europeans werent doing more to assist their neighbor, which serves as a bulwark between Europe and Russia

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/trump-says-he-held-ukraine-aid-over-concerns-about-corruption.

As UR has explained better than I have, Trump stating this PAST Wednesday is shady after the whole questioning of the timelines came out. *IF* he had stated this back when suspending the aid (or even after), it would fits *your* narrative

He said it to certain staff when he made the decision. Either way, suspicions are irrelevant. Back them up with proof and hard facts.

Ruvan22 posted...

karlpilkington4 posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

karlpilkington4 posted...

Not really, if you're sending aid to someone you need to make sure the country and its leaders aren't corrupt. Small delays shouldn't be suspicious.

You did this in the other topic too.

You pick out 1 thing, ignoring everything else and then go "Well this one thing isn't illegal/suspicious" or "This 1 thing is hearsay (most things are hearsay)"

And it's bizarre.

In this case it's not even true. Both the funds being frozen without reason and the funds suddenly being delayed the moment they were unfrozen are suspicious as fuck by themselves.

They are not reflected in the US relations with any other nation. There are plenty of nations the US sends aid too that are unquestionably corrupt. Such as Saudi Arabia for example.

And the president never gave reason for why the funds were frozen or delayed in the first place, while overruling the other 2 branches of government to do so.

That's suspicious before the Rudy/Barr/Phone Call/Whistleblower shit.

For one, I'm not picking 1 thing and ignoring the rest. Not sure why you'd just make up a blatant lie. And there is reason to delay the funds. Trump already explained it. He was investigating corruption and making sure the country isnt supporting Russia. You simply don't like that answer.

But you are? You don't respond to the rest of his points?
Also, where did Trump say "I'm delaying it to make Ukraine isn't supporting Russia"?

I responded to his points in the other topic, and I responded to his points in this topic.

there is another possible explanation for the temporary suspension of aid. At the time, Ukraine was transitioning to a new, democratically-elected government and a review of the aid may have been justified under such circumstances.

https://www.apnews.com/94fdeaddc6b34c02b97278674b87541e

President Trump on Wednesday linked his decision to delay U.S. military aid to Ukraine to concerns about high levels of corruption in that country, and especially to frustration that the Europeans werent doing more to assist their neighbor, which serves as a bulwark between Europe and Russia

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/trump-says-he-held-ukraine-aid-over-concerns-about-corruption.

sondast posted...

TheRealDill2005 posted...

CADE FOSTER posted...

fits them perfectly

What about economic growth? What about the tax cuts that have increased the size of my paychecks? What about the improvements in the works for healthcare? What about the decrease in unemployment, especially for African-Americans?

There are plenty of reasons to support Trump. People shouldn't be rubber-stamped as racists for doing so.

Would be nice if that stuff actually happened.

Which one(s) hasn't happened?

Shablagoo posted...

Sirfetchd posted...

evil_zombie11 posted...

viewmaster_pi posted...

It's pretty gross for you guys to just write these girls off like damaged goods. It's one thing to not be interested, but bipolar disorder is a real mental illness, it's not just being clingy or needy or moody. Don't dehumanize the poor things. They need support, not vilification.

I was very understanding of her needs but also I'm not gonna stand around and let her threaten me with violence or death threats either.

It's always this
My cousin dated a girl and she was nice ! Like really nice I liked her we all hung out a lot. Problem is every few months of feeling normal she would always decide she didnt need her medication anymore then a few weeks later shes threatening to jump off a bridge (seriously). It was very sad then she would get help (twice taken for psychiatric hold) and then shed be back on meds and normal again.

Rinse and repeat until he couldn't do it anymore.
Why not just STAY ON THE MEDICATION

Side effect of bipolar. A lot of people end up going off their meds. Its hard to describe what manic periods can really feel like. You can think youre the smartest person who ever existed.

Okay but in all seriousness once you try this pattern like 5 times dont you understand the pattern? You dont have amnesia so you KNOW what happened last time.

Ruvan22 posted...

TheRealDill2005 posted...

Ruvan22 posted...

If you notice, I didn't state anything about the larger population of Trump supporters in my post. As for specifics, sure - you stated that while drunk you had many many racist statements (this was in context of a news story about waitress who was fired for similar behavior). You said that while you genuinely meant what you said while drunk, you were wise enough to have friends who didn't film you

I feel like you're trying to bait me here...

This falls into the category of misinformation/misinterpretation. The comments I make in these situations are directed AT the friends I'm spending time with. They aren't made with malicious intentions whatsoever. It's a situation where the comments are "acceptable" in the context as jabs between friends. I would never want the comments to be heard by outsiders though since they aren't a true representation of my views.

Whether you feel I'm trying to bait you is entirely your own thinking, unless (as you have said in other topics) you have a way to prove my intentions.

In the context of that thread/news story, you stated your racist comments were genuine (as were hers, since she wasn't making jabs at friends but demeaning entire races/groups of people). So either you misspoke then or are mistaken now - which is it?

I like how you put this entirely on me. You're making reference to a discussion from ages ago that no one has visibility of and sharing your interpretation as fact.

Or you could be a man

Gamerguymass posted...

TheRealDill2005 posted...

Ruvan22 posted...

TheRealDill2005 posted...

Ruvan22 posted...

How do you define "good person"?

Kind, strong sense of morality and faith, etc. I'm not using a unique definition here.

Ok expand on "strong sense of morality and faith" for me then...how does Donald Trump fit your understanding of this?

He has the backing of many church-goers.

So the only way to be a "good person" means you have to be religious?

That was not my intent with the comment. You can still be a good person without a religious background. My implication was that Trump wouldn't have the support of this group unless he was a good person himself.

Ruvan22 posted...

If you notice, I didn't state anything about the larger population of Trump supporters in my post. As for specifics, sure - you stated that while drunk you had many many racist statements (this was in context of a news story about waitress who was fired for similar behavior). You said that while you genuinely meant what you said while drunk, you were wise enough to have friends who didn't film you

I feel like you're trying to bait me here...

This falls into the category of misinformation/misinterpretation. The comments I make in these situations are directed AT the friends I'm spending time with. They aren't made with malicious intentions whatsoever. It's a situation where the comments are "acceptable" in the context as jabs between friends. I would never want the comments to be heard by outsiders though since they aren't a true representation of my views.

Ruvan22 posted...

TheRealDill2005 posted...

Ruvan22 posted...

TheRealDill2005 posted...

ledbowman posted...

Trump is realdill

I'm not as good of a person and leader as Trump. That is a very kind compliment though.

Also, shouldn't mods be unbiased? I'm concerned about some of the posts here.

How do you define "good person"?

Kind, strong sense of morality and faith, etc. I'm not using a unique definition here.

Ok expand on "strong sense of morality and faith" for me then...how does Donald Trump fit your understanding of this?

He has the backing of many church-goers.

Ruvan22 posted...

TheRealDill2005 posted...

Conception616 posted...

hockeybub89 posted...

Guy is barely cold and we keep mocking his T-shirt

That RealDill user is a well known racist.

What!? How could I have a reputation as a racist? I'm a minority myself.

Whether you are a minority or not, you've frequently espoused racist viewpoints/outcomes on this board.

Also, if Fox (as you said) chose the angle to obscure his tshirt they didn't do a very good job, as it is still clearly visible. They could have used just a cropped head picture?

I don't hold any racist beliefs. I have made a few pro-Trump posts in my time here, and I've noticed that a few people accuse all Trump supporters of being racist. If you can recall anything else, please let me know. I'm sure it is nothing more than misinterpretation/miscommunication.

Conception616 posted...

hockeybub89 posted...

Guy is barely cold and we keep mocking his T-shirt

That RealDill user is a well known racist.

What!? How could I have a reputation as a racist? I'm a minority myself.

Bluharvest posted...

Isn't it just back to the future time travel?

no, it's more like Dragonball Z's time travel.

The alternative was following the stupid comic arc.

Ruvan22 posted...

Blue_Inigo posted...

Two key witnesses, who were both black, murdered after the trial? That is not a fucking coincidence but the usual suspects will continue to be dishonest

Two? I thought it was just the guy in the Dragonball Z shirt...

LOLOLOLO HEY GUISE THE DBZ SHIRT TOTALLY DISCREDITS HIM LMAO!!! HAHAHAHA

Gee, as if the shirts you guys use with pictures of 45's face pasted on top of a Rambo body, riding a tank with a rocket launcher on his shoulder, U flag on hand and a bald eagle landing on his hand were much better than a DBZ shirt lol

Two key witnesses, who were both black, murdered after the trial? That is not a fucking coincidence but the usual suspects will continue to be dishonest

Those things seem to go hand in hand. If I were born in a culturally isolated bubble and raised believe that black people were the ridiculous caricatures /pol/ makes them out to be, I'd be genuinely afraid of the very concept of them, too.

Well, more likely I'd just figure out that my local surroundings and family were idiots, but that would be difficult.

Ruvan22 posted...

TheRealDill2005 posted...

ledbowman posted...

Trump is realdill

I'm not as good of a person and leader as Trump. That is a very kind compliment though.

Also, shouldn't mods be unbiased? I'm concerned about some of the posts here.

How do you define "good person"?

Kind, strong sense of morality and faith, etc. I'm not using a unique definition here.

ledbowman posted...

Trump is realdill

I'm not as good of a person and leader as Trump. That is a very kind compliment though.

Also, shouldn't mods be unbiased? I'm concerned about some of the posts here.

Ruvan22 posted...

So could this be adapted into a enhanced strength etc? Like Batman Beyond's suit?

yes. there are already exosuits who allow you to lift like 200lbs easy, but last time i heard it either have like 15 minutes battery capacity or have to be plugged into a socket

Executive Decision

Zikten posted...

me too. the only Terminator movie I don't like is the 4th one.

I admire Salvation for trying something different at least.

Bond is dead.

Casino Royale's promotional lie was that this was the gritty antihero that 007 was before he became a double 0 agent. It provided a fresh new take on Bond, but fans were justifiably disappointed when he showed no improvement or character development over the next film. Skyfall showed a spark of life, but SPECTRE went back to the same beats as Casino Royale.

Bond's defining characteristic is that he's suave. He can be an antihero. He was designed as one and retrospect has been kinder to Timothy Dalton's take on the character than what fans or critics at the time were. But being suave is what sets him apart from every other tough guy to hold a gun from John Wayne to John Wick.

After 15 years of EON saying, "No. James Bond is the British Jason Bourne. Shut the fuck up about that being classy shit," there's really no turning back. When the next poor bastard dons the tuxedo, it will have been two decades since the classic classy spy was even a thing. And that's if they don't double down on him being a gritty, totally blue collar antihero by having him literally piss on a tuxedo.

I don't care if the next Bond is a black lesbian in a committed relationship. Just make her classy for fuck's sake or else let the series die the quiet, peaceful death it so richly deserves.

UnfairRepresent posted...

karlpilkington4 posted...

Not really, if you're sending aid to someone you need to make sure the country and its leaders aren't corrupt. Small delays shouldn't be suspicious.

You did this in the other topic too.

You pick out 1 thing, ignoring everything else and then go "Well this one thing isn't illegal/suspicious" or "This 1 thing is hearsay (most things are hearsay)"

And it's bizarre.

In this case it's not even true. Both the funds being frozen without reason and the funds suddenly being delayed the moment they were unfrozen are suspicious as fuck by themselves.

They are not reflected in the US relations with any other nation. There are plenty of nations the US sends aid too that are unquestionably corrupt. Such as Saudi Arabia for example.

And the president never gave reason for why the funds were frozen or delayed in the first place, while overruling the other 2 branches of government to do so.

That's suspicious before the Rudy/Barr/Phone Call/Whistleblower shit.

For one, I'm not picking 1 thing and ignoring the rest. Not sure why you'd just make up a blatant lie. And there is reason to delay the funds. Trump already explained it. He was investigating corruption and making sure the country isnt supporting Russia. You simply don't like that answer.

Also-

One senior administration official said Monday that Trumps decision to hold back the funds was based on his concerns about there being a lot of corruption in Ukraine

Why is that not a valid reason? Because it doesn't fit your narrative?

UnfairRepresent posted...

karlpilkington4 posted...

What complaint and what transcripts? What are these other calls of treasonous behavior, and who has heard them? I've read the transcripts to the call to the Ukrainian President, and I didn't see any sort of illegal or nefarious activity anywhere in them.A random "whistleblower" saying things, isnt proof He needs to back it with hard evidence

But... His/her claims have been backed with hard evidence O_o

The transcript of the call backs what the Whistleblower said and Rudy Giuliani has backed up a lot of other shit too.

Really the only thing that hasn't been coroberated is there is a lot of "People in the Administration/intelligence commity keep being told to do to dumb/illegal things." and that's the small fry.

Also keep in mind the full whistleblower complaint has not been released, only part of it and that's the part which deals with the Ukraine phone call.

Giuliani has admitted publically that he asked Ukraine to look into digging up dirt on Joe Biden and his son for months. Between May and August. This was before and then after Trump froze the military aid.

Trump also freezing the military aid is not in dispute. And he has never expressed a valid reason for doing so. Which is a big deal you ignore.

This is a big problem because Giuliani is not part of the US government so he should not be involved in foreign policy and this investigation did not go through the correct channels. It's shady illegal shit before you even get to the phone call.

If Ukraine possesses evidence or can obtain evidence that Biden used tax money that benefited his family, then the President has every right to investigate.

...I thought it was Dubya who choked, on a pretzel or something.

bobaban posted...

I also think he sounds like a yes, dear cuck.

Lol he is anything but. I get it seems that way from the post. I only focused on his positives here but I have complained about him quite a bit.

But if there is one thing about him, he doesnt put up with any crap or disrespect.

Ill just leave this here:
https://m.imgur.com/a/YZMyt

Ruvan22 posted...

karlpilkington4 posted...

Monolith1676 posted...

50%? I was never polled so this is clearly not a true number.

The whole thing is extremely biased. I remember a news report comparing this to Water Gate. Like...no. One was criminal, the other (Trump) is clearly not.

Was that news report on Fox?

Nope. It was CNN, MSNBC, USA Today.

Monolith1676 posted...

50%? I was never polled so this is clearly not a true number.

The whole thing is extremely biased. I remember a news report comparing this to Water Gate. Like...no. One was criminal, the other (Trump) is clearly not.

AsucaHayashi posted...

victim blaming at its finest xd

"it's not the man with the gun who shot person knocking at his door at night.. it's the guy who was trying to go for a surprise prank!"

also,

I'm conviced gun culture has everything to do with this tragedy.

it's not even gun "culture" anymore, it's literal gun "indoctrination".

Weird... whenever theres a mass shooting no one wants to blame the man with the gun, just the gun. Also crime culture should be more severely scrutinized if you dont want people answering their doors with a gun in the middle of the night. Gun culture is hardly relevant.

Something that happens on a daily basis isn't a meltdown.

Doom_Art posted...

muchdran posted...

I'm really curious about the outcome. What are Democrats hiding?

>Trump caught in shady dealings with foreign figures
> Several of Trump's staff under investigation
> Trump melts down on twitter
> "What are Democrats hiding?"

Joe Bidens son caught, traveling with diplomatic passport, living off a federal unlimited credit card, making $50,000.00 a month from another country deposited into overseas non taxable bank account.
And you're mad at TRUMP for exposing this deep state corruption.

Ruvan22 posted...

zinezinzadan posted...

I cant tell if people are stupid, or really just stupid? He wasnt implying that theyre followers of that god in a true sense, therefore you shouldnt be offended by the statement. He was implying that they like and would follow a god like him because most democrats are okay with killing children. It is a process known as abortion. Because of this, hes implying that they share something in common with this god. Thats the joke. Because that god had no problem or second thought about ending the lives of children. People take everything out of context, Im seriously sick of this political soft generation where everything offends you. Fuck off and grow up people. Im right down the middle between republican and Democrat so I have no bias here. You really just need to fking grow up whoever keeps bitching.

Youd probably like Hitler because of (insert x action you did here) that resembles an idea hitler agreed with, is totally different than calling someone an outright Nazzi and hitler follower.

Tbh Id probably consider myself a Democrat more than republican. So me defending a republicans free speech really goes to show you how fucked up this political correctness climate is and it is blown out of control. Whats next? I cant even say whats my favorite color because itll offend someone who hates my favorite color? Wtf is wrong with you people

But he didn't say "Like" or "as if", he literally said "Democrats do not believe in the Christian God" - that's a declarative statement, like saying "zinezinzadan is wearing a blue shirt"

Maybe I need to watch the video. From the listed quotes from the article i never got the idea that he made a definitive they worship him type of thing. I thought he was joking around.

I cant tell if people are stupid, or really just stupid? He wasnt implying that theyre followers of that god in a true sense, therefore you shouldnt be offended by the statement. He was implying that they like and would follow a god like him because most democrats are okay with killing children. It is a process known as abortion. Because of this, hes implying that they share something in common with this god. Thats the joke. Because that god had no problem or second thought about ending the lives of children. People take everything out of context, Im seriously sick of this political soft generation where everything offends you. Fuck off and grow up people. Im right down the middle between republican and Democrat so I have no bias here. You really just need to fking grow up whoever keeps bitching.

Youd probably like Hitler because of (insert x action you did here) that resembles an idea hitler agreed with, is totally different than calling someone an outright Nazzi and hitler follower.

Tbh Id probably consider myself a Democrat more than republican. So me defending a republicans free speech really goes to show you how fucked up this political correctness climate is and it is blown out of control. Whats next? I cant even say whats my favorite color because itll offend someone who hates my favorite color? Wtf is wrong with you people