Lurker > Coastal_elite

Imagine purposely acting like you don't understand what is racist and what is not. There are far better ways to cause drama and shitpost.

I just didn't like how it shit on a lot of the Greek myths

DisneyFan462 posted...

HannibalBarca3 posted...

Give me the rundown on this admiral dude

I former mod that refused to abide by the SJW handbook

Former mod who defended the Bundy militia and said the north started the civil war

HannibalBarca3 posted...

Give me the rundown on this admiral dude

I former mod that refused to abide by the SJW handbook

Kitt posted...

Lmfao is this real life?

I recall he admitted he used J-Date specifically to avoid minorities on dating apps

Coastal_elite posted...

Now that he is gone, I wonder if the activity at /pol/ or other chans like that or /r/t_d will suddenly spike

i s there a "r/imaracistassholeandgamefaqsbannedme" board?

SBAllen posted...

It's been touched upon already, but one of the reasons you see older accounts stick to purgatory rather than banning is that their identity, their personal account that they are known for, is the strongest carrot that we have to dangle in front of someone to force them to behave. Once you take it away, there's nothing left to encourage good behavior.

You absolutely cannot treat all problematic users the same because they aren't the same. I saw mention of Hey earlier. People of that nature can't be treated in the same way as someone like The Admiral because they do things much differently. Hey was stopped by months and months of silent site updates to block each method used to create spam accounts. I have no reason to believe that Admiral would go down that kind of route, which is why he isn't treated the same way.

Having said that, he's been on an extremely slippery slope this year, and managing him via purgatories has gotten rather tedious. Since he's gotten himself suspended yet again, and the "good behavior" window has all but disappeared at this point, he's getting the boot. He almost got it a few months ago on a different suspension but the offense was so minor that a ban just didn't make sense. This time the punishment fits the crime, so that's that.

To those who think it should be a trivial process keeping someone away from the site, I would encourage you to do some research on just how easy it is to access anything you want to on the Internet. We can and certainly do things to slow people down (see: Hey), but if someone wants to be here, they are going to be here. That's all there is to it, and anyone who thinks otherwise is extremely naive.

As for Admiral, I wouldn't start celebrating his banning if I were you. The carrot's gone, and he clearly likes CE. Guess we'll see what kind of person he is.

This is the most transparency I've ever seen from any single mod or admin, ever. It should be noted that transparency is extremely appreciated when dealing with things of this matter.

*CElutes*

They also should raise the level minimum here. Itd really help with people just spamming alts and maybe, just maybe, people will start acting like adults.

keepit in the general

Coastal_elite posted...

Error1355 posted...

Let me guess, you guys are gonna go off on some asinine tangent saying the mods protect him while at the same time suspending him which is the harshest thing a moderator can do to a user account.

Alright, alright, addy is a tolerant, kind and charitative gentleman and a scholar, I'm sorry. Geez, calm down bro @_@

I dislike admiral as much as anyone does here and I'm always pleased to see him get put in time out, but not even missing, but blatantly ignoring error's point here is just asinine.

Coastal_elite posted...

We don't demand that models and action stars look like Jack Black, Danny DeVito and the fat kid from deadpool 2

maybe you should

Let me guess, you guys are gonna go off on some asinine tangent saying the mods protect him while at the same time suspending him which is the harshest thing a moderator can do to a user account.

You act as if Admiral is treated any differently than other tenured users.

MC_BatCommander posted...

Lmao why does she have cgi enhanced cat titties

...shouldn't she have six of them?

Coastal_elite posted...

Solid_Seb posted...

Both are attractive imo, but what is the point you're trying to make? Both of these are very real body types, both are buying lingerie, so both should have models of their size to look at.

Models are models because they make clothing look good. Models are meant to be attractive.

Do you see Jack Black advertising speedos? His body type is very real too.

That's a fair point, but switching the genders in question is a different situation imo. There isn't much of a scene/movement for plus sized male models. Women on the other hand, have long been wanting models that represent other sizes than small

Coastal_elite posted...

Define force.

It's the cancel culture thing we're living in. A rather small vocal group shames a company or individual and then things like this happen for fear of reprisal.

Fear of reprisal?

The girls in Mortal Kombat 9 looked like strippers. What reprisals did they face over that? Someone made an angry tweet?

Coastal_elite posted...

Just take a look at the new mortal kombat

"quick! cover Jade's butt and hair and chest! Reduce Sonya and Cassie's boobs too! Dress Skarlett from head to toe! Oh, while you're at that, rip Baraka's pants a little, make them more like shorts. And Make Shao Khan fight in his underwear"

No one forced them to do it though. It's not like the government stepped in and told them. It's just a business decision on their part.

Both are attractive imo, but what is the point you're trying to make? Both of these are very real body types, both are buying lingerie, so both should have models of their size to look at.

Basically. The justification of the double-standard is that showing off a male body is empowering to men because it caters to a power fantasy of having nice muscles. Meanwhile, since there's no power to be had from a nice bust or a nice ass (except the sexual kind), it's just pure objectification.

Bullshit 101.

Cats isn't the best example though because the film likes to show off Taylor Swift's feline ass and I secretly wanna see the film for it. <_<

Coastal_elite posted...

IMO this is all about the fatter people being mad at the super hot models being admired by men in the runway.

Did you at least read the excerpt? The two cited reasons are changing standards of beauty (majority of people aren't attracted to sticks) and declining revenue, with short mention of the ceo's close relationship to Epstein.

2Privileged4U posted...

50% more CEmen would have jobs if their fathers were more like Admiral.

In Purgatory?

The Nazis are getting louder and it's making the right nervous.

Coastal_elite posted...

Why were the violent alt-righters outside of denny's harassing the non-violent alt-righters inside of denny's?

The guy leading the non violent meeting is a huge piece of shit.

"These people are nazis? So what do they have against us? I mean we're not-" Lol that really put the cherry on top of this vid

you may as well be f***ing a bowl of warm wate

holy fuck TC you have really made those of us with legitimate grievances look bad in the last ~60 posts

Tmaster148 posted...

Xx09x7 posted...

Haven't been moderated in a long time

You just came off a warning.

Hadn't been moderated in a long time before that warning, is what I meant to say. But yeah had I known mods can suspend you without a reason, I wouldn't have made this topic. I'll probably stop posting here soon, since you can essentially be moderated for a difference in opinion, or not being extremely "politically correct" in accordance with the far left. And I'm a leftist myself.

@Alpha218 posted...

I know this is basically just screaming into the void at this point, but how many other sites even have a dispute system???

To answer your question, every board Ive spent time on has had some kind dispute system. Back in the day when it was really busy (early 2000s) TrekBBS even had a separate forum where you could present your case outside the normal dispute system and everyone could weigh in on the warning.

I was a member of another site where every six months theyd release the threads from the mod-only forum in the name of transparency. That way members could see behind the curtain and know mods were acting in good faith even if they were making calls you didnt agree with.

Back before Reddit, Twitter, and Youtube took over, BBSes were everywhere. I owned and ran two myself. Every BBS I was on had some ability to contest warnings. So GameFAQs is in no way unique in that regard.

Why does he keep coming back? Doesn't he have small-time celebrities to bang?

Black person somewhere does something

Admiral: REEEEEEEE!!!!!

The rich would be massively outnumbered, any advantage they would have wouldnt last very long against the insane numbers of opposition.

Your years of concern trolling is old.

What was it for this time?