Lurker > _B0xxY2J0sHBK__

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Board List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
Topic	The Trumps all have weak chins, beady eyes, and anus-y lips
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 8:32:36 PM #30	MC_BatCommander posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... https://imgur.com/a/OKReY5R who are these people and how does that change the fact that Trump's mouth looks like a god damn butthole when he talks Those are the stereotypical soy boys that are always getting on Trump's case. I'm just saying that maybe these people shouldn't be judging other people on looks --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	[Live Event] CNN's Jim Acosta banned from the White House
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 8:31:13 PM #39	The Great Muta 22 posted... I love the fake outrage from Trump supporters over this. And all this does is make Acosta an even hotter commodity for CNN. And they'll just replace him at the WH with another reporter Fake outrage? Pretty nobody likes when a guy commits battery on women. He should have seen jail time for putting his hands on a woman without permission. If him being barred from these things is his only punishment, then he should be thanking his lucky stars. Honestly, he deserves to be fired but we all know how accountability works --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	[Live Event] CNN's Jim Acosta banned from the White House
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 8:08:49 PM #13	TheRealDill2000 posted... Taharqa_ posted... Trump is such a pussy. This could have easily been avoided if Acosta behaved in a professional manner. Trump is not to blame here. This. Trump has no problem with reporting. It's always been about professionalism. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Trump demands that Jeff Sessions resign
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 6:44:38 PM #108	Lol, that wasn't Obama. By every metric, stat and economist, this is all equated to Trump. Who knew tax cuts and deregulation would book the economy? On top of that, Trump being one the best business men of all times creates consumer confidence. Ignoring Trump's awesome economy, everything is literally the same as it was under Obama except ISIS is basically dead and relations with Asia is must better unployment is at record lows especially for black americans and no war. So if you think Trump and his cabinet is awful, I shudder at your thoughts about Obama. Of course I'm sure you will some how blame Republicans for nothing but I understand people treating politics as a sport. My only gripe is, could things be better? Sure but things are still amazing, why not actually enjoy it? --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Trump demands that Jeff Sessions resign
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 6:35:40 PM #104	Bishop9800 posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... Bishop9800 posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... Why is this a problem? This is one reason Trump's term has been successful. Focusing on hiring people that are highly qualified until they finish their mission and cleaning house for the next mission is a highly intelligent way of running things. Can someone get some TP for this shit? It isn't shit. Would you rather have a rotation of high qualified specialists or one average worker for years? Which do you think gets a better job done? The thing is, (as multiple people have pointed out) none one in his cabinet is qualified for anything.. Anyone with half a brain could see that. sees who I'm talking to Ohh, my bad. Sorry about that. The last two years disproves that but hey, I get it. Democrats hate Republicans and Republicans hate Democrats and only the independent centrist can see that both parties are the exact same. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Trump demands that Jeff Sessions resign
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 6:26:31 PM #101	thronedfire2 posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... Bio1590 posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... Bishop9800 posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... Why is this a problem? This is one reason Trump's term has been successful. Focusing on hiring people that are highly qualified until they finish their mission and cleaning house for the next mission is a highly intelligent way of running things. Can someone get some TP for this shit? It isn't shit. Would you rather have a rotation of high qualified specialists or one average worker for years? Which do you think gets a better job done? High qualified specialists. Whitaker is in zero way prepared to be AG. Lol, and you are qualified to make that choice over several career politicians and experts in the field? Trump is neither of those things He is but he also is surrounded with some of the best political minds in the world to help him make decisions --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Trump demands that Jeff Sessions resign
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 6:18:13 PM #99	electricbugs2 posted... Don't respond to Boxxy, he thinks weed is on the level of heroin. Just out here trollin' in the trenches. I never made that claim. I claimed both don't effect anybody but the user so good logic dictates they be treated the same: legalize both or have both be illegal. I'm ok with both being legal --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Trump demands that Jeff Sessions resign
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 6:16:16 PM #98	Bio1590 posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... Bishop9800 posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... Why is this a problem? This is one reason Trump's term has been successful. Focusing on hiring people that are highly qualified until they finish their mission and cleaning house for the next mission is a highly intelligent way of running things. Can someone get some TP for this shit? It isn't shit. Would you rather have a rotation of high qualified specialists or one average worker for years? Which do you think gets a better job done? High qualified specialists. Whitaker is in zero way prepared to be AG. Lol, and you are qualified to make that choice over several career politicians and experts in the field? --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Judge gets so mad at Democrats that he, uh, releases juvenile defendents
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 6:09:52 PM #48	Antifar posted... Releasing juvenile defendants is good. Doing it out of spite because you're mad about losing is funny. Nothing in your OP suggests anything about spite. That was literally your own conclusion where Occams razor suggest a much easier answer. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Trump: If the Democrats investigate me I will be forced to investigate them
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 6:08:00 PM #27	I think he absolutely should. While he already drained a lot of the swamp, why not do it on an even bigger scale. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Judge gets so mad at Democrats that he, uh, releases juvenile defendents
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 6:06:36 PM #44	Ridersofhogs, thanks for posting that. It's fascinating. Hypocrisy aside, what the judge did was release good behavior inmates who had strict supervision but these kenneddy people, that was extremely reckless. I'm not sure that should be legal --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Trump demands that Jeff Sessions resign
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 6:00:02 PM #93	Bishop9800 posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... Why is this a problem? This is one reason Trump's term has been successful. Focusing on hiring people that are highly qualified until they finish their mission and cleaning house for the next mission is a highly intelligent way of running things. Can someone get some TP for this shit? It isn't shit. Would you rather have a rotation of high qualified specialists or one average worker for years? Which do you think gets a better job done? --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	The house can now force the IRS to release Trump's tax returns.
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:52:04 PM #43	EndOfDiscOne posted... Ray_Dorset posted... EndOfDiscOne posted... EndOfDiscOne posted... Genocet_10-325 posted... EndOfDiscOne posted... Is their some law that presidents have to release their returns? I thought candidates just did it out of tradition and to appear transparent. There's no law but they can still subpoena them For what cause, in this case? Serious question for anyone who knows. Why will congress subpoena the tax returns for any reason other than "we want to see them"? Is that considered a good enough reason? To see if he is beholden in any way to a foreign power and to ensure that he has not broken any laws. Just the circumstantial evidence around him should be enough to have his taxes reviewed and then a report made public, at the very least. Okay, that would be a good reason if they are investigation him for something else. Maybe it would be if there was circumstances evidence but there isn't. If there was, Mueller would have done this ages ago. Know who else would have leaked info? The IRS. So we do know that currently there is no reason or legal reason to do it so it's impossible without his permission --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Just put my claim for Dez Bryant in my fantasy league AMA
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:42:13 PM #6	He's new to the scheme and they have their guy. He's a low end bet at best. Even if I was hard up for a WR, he's not really worth the gamble --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	New opioid 5 to 10 more powerful than Fentanyl.
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:40:04 PM #11	Well if we are gonna legalize weed, might as well start letting the flood gates open. The libertarian in me has no issues with this. As long as it's harmless, let people have personal freedom --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Imagine fighting for Native Americans by getting a video game feather removed
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:38:05 PM #27	RiderofHogs posted... Remember when Atari had a game where you raped an Native girl? That was something worth getting offended about. That was the game I mentioned. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	The Trumps all have weak chins, beady eyes, and anus-y lips
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:29:14 PM #16	butthole666 posted... Lordgold666 posted... Ivanka gross? You buggin She looks like a Bobs Burgers character. _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... https://imgur.com/a/OKReY5R 4chan memes suck shit and your chin is almost certainly weaker than anyone in that pic I'm just saying people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Especially when half of the Trump's are super models and the other half get laid by super models constantly. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	The house can now force the IRS to release Trump's tax returns.
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:27:15 PM #33	Because other presidents have released their taxes to the public doesn't mean anybody can force Trump, a private citizen, to release anything to the public. This literally can't be done without people in the IRS and others getting fired and penalized legally --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Idris Elba named Sexiest Man Alive
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:18:26 PM #41	Idris Elba is literally old and washed up. I'm literally sexier by a LONG shot --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	The Trumps all have weak chins, beady eyes, and anus-y lips
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:17:47 PM #4	https://imgur.com/a/OKReY5R --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Finally Trump fires someone in his administration
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:15:22 PM #5	Complete_Idi0t posted... If he's such a good business man why didn't he invent Tesla He found out the service industry is where it's at and became a self made billionaire --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	What president has the best FIRST NAME??
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:14:31 PM #2	If you shorten Donald to Don, it becomes an awesome Italian title. Trump is amazing in itself. So that's one of my picks. Unfortunately most presidents had names like Bill John or George --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Finally Trump fires someone in his administration
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:11:02 PM #3	That's one of my favorite parts of his administration. Instead of covering up bad workers, he replaces them when needed. I expect, however, nothing less from one of the best business men in world history. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Trump demands that Jeff Sessions resign
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:08:37 PM #85	Why is this a problem? This is one reason Trump's term has been successful. Focusing on hiring people that are highly qualified until they finish their mission and cleaning house for the next mission is a highly intelligent way of running things. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Imagine fighting for Native Americans by getting a video game feather removed
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 5:06:46 PM #5	Giant_Aspirin posted... remember that NES game that was a Mega Man clone with a Native American protagonist? Remember that atari game called general Custer's revenge! --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	imagine allowing elections to be won by land mass rather than popular vote
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 3:21:06 PM #40	Antifar posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... The big states are indoctrination centers whether Texas or California. Smaller states have open minds Smaller states include Vermont, the Dakotas, Delaware, Rhode Island, Hawaii... All manner of deep blue or deep red states. Fair enough. I guess I really meant purple states, since for whatever reason they avoided being indoctrinated, they are easier to trust --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	imagine allowing elections to be won by land mass rather than popular vote
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 3:01:27 PM #38	Anteaterking posted... fenderbender321 posted... I wonder how many people look at election results and claim "If the election were decided by popular vote, ________ would have won!" Even though there's no way to know who would have won considering that the candidates would have campaigned much differently. It's like saying "If it were illegal to throw forward passes in football, your team would have lost!" It's like....no...I'm pretty sure NE wouldn't have Tom Brady as their QB if it were illegal to throw forward passes. I mean, we can analyze campaigning the way it currently is by just disentangling two aspects of the electoral college. Our presidential electoral system is really made up of two parts: the winner takes all aspect for states and the actual apportionment we use. Most people when they complain about the electoral college are complaining about the apportionment, and that's the main thing counter arguments such as "Well then everyone will spend time in NY, California, etc." If you look at 2016, 94% of presidential campaign events happened in 12 states, Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia, Michigan, Iowa, New Hampshire, Colorado, Nevada, Wisconsin, and Arizona. Now when we rank states by electoral votes/voting eligible population, here are where those states rank: 50th, 49th, 48th, 47th, 44th, 43rd, 23rd, 10th, 38th,17th, 32nd, 34th. (Which averages to 36.25) You can see from this that candidates are already campaigning with little to no regard towards apportionment. They're going to some of the WORST states from a number of voters you need to win electoral votes perspective. Why is that? Well, it's because those states are battleground swing states where campaigning can actually impact the outcome because there are more people to swing the minds of/get out your support there. What would we expect in a popular vote system? Basically more of that. It wouldn't be worth it for a Democrats to spend all of their time in California and New York, because that's not where they need to gin up support. It's not that. The big states are indoctrination centers whether Texas or California. Smaller states have open minds. They tend to be smarter for that reason and I'm ok with their vote mattering more --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	YR if RBG retires tomorrow
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 1:43:46 PM #4	I'd be ok with it. Historically, she hasn't been all that great. And thus far, our two new justices have been amazing. I think we could use fresh blood in there. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Poll: do you think the mid-terms were a success or failure for Trump?
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 1:41:09 PM #36	andel posted... GregShmedley posted... andel posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... BLAKUboy posted... There is no way to spin this as anything but a loss for Republicans. Uhhh no. The GoP still has huge control and that is with a pendulum like government. That's a huge win. Especially since there was no blue wave. lol continue your meltdown, the gop just lost total control Man, you're really trying too hard with this meltdown thing. you trump cultists have been in melty mode since before yesterday. i guess you guys knew dems would win big yesterday? You mean we knew something that's happened since the start of the country? When Republicans are president, people vote Democrat. When Democrats are president, people vote Republican. I mean, who knows exactly why. My guess is people are never happy so they vote against the party in power. I feel that's a fair guess and history does support that theory. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Poll: do you think the mid-terms were a success or failure for Trump?
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 1:36:44 PM #30	SixStringHero posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... DanHarenChamp posted... If young people voted, the dems could literally dominate the government. That's not true. Our government is literally a pendulum. People in America always rage against the machine no matter who is in Exactly. What occurred with the House is not out of historical trends and norms. During Obama's first midterm, his party lost 63 seats. Exactly. This isn't really a win or loss by either party. It's just a trend that always happens. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Poll: do you think the mid-terms were a success or failure for Trump?
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 1:34:46 PM #28	andel posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... BLAKUboy posted... There is no way to spin this as anything but a loss for Republicans. Uhhh no. The GoP still has huge control and that is with a pendulum like government. That's a huge win. Especially since there was no blue wave. lol continue your meltdown, the gop just lost total control What meltdown. I'm glad we have a more government of checks and balances in case Trump does do something crazy. I actually realize both parties need to be in the government for that reason and, gasp, actually world together. But, from my experience, things work better when the Democrats are the checks and the Republican ls are the balance --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Poll: do you think the mid-terms were a success or failure for Trump?
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 1:29:05 PM #25	BLAKUboy posted... There is no way to spin this as anything but a loss for Republicans. Uhhh no. The GoP still has huge control and that is with a pendulum like government. That's a huge win. Especially since there was no blue wave. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	So can we celebrate that the election didn't go catastrophically bad this time?
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 12:10:21 PM #13	I'm actually cool with it. Republicans still have the power but there is a slight bit of checks and balance in the rare chance we need it. Hopefully this doesn't lead to any obstruction Bs. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Donald Trump Jr. Expecting to Be Indicted by Mueller Soon
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 11:33:27 AM #5	Easiest parden ever. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Repubs will turn on Trump once his term is over
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 11:28:59 AM #23	Trump literally funded his own campaign and is choosing to not make money while president because he wants to see the country improve and he has done so. Our economy is better than it has almost ever been. The only thing that compares to Trump's economic success in US history is the golden age Reagan got us into in the 90s. Why would anyone turn on him? --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	How often does your work call you in on your off days?
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 11:15:40 AM #16	Roxborough4Ever posted... because there is no "we called you, you didn't get our message" That excise didn't work with answering machines. Regardless, I'm in no obligation to even use my phone on days off. So yeah, maybe I didn't get the message. This isn't hard --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	How often does your work call you in on your off days?
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 11:13:28 AM #12	Roxborough4Ever posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... Imagine picking up the phone when caller ID exists your living in the past Grandpa, now a days they bombard your phone with texts How does that change anything? --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Today's Liberals are yesterday's Christians in terms of complaining about
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 11:12:09 AM #16	This is my favorite example: https://www.gonintendo.com/stories/286610-nintendo-removes-sombrero-wearing-mario-from-super-mario-odyssey --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	How often does your work call you in on your off days?
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 11:10:48 AM #10	Imagine picking up the phone when caller ID exists --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Repubs will turn on Trump once his term is over
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 11:08:03 AM #6	The GoP hasn't turned on Bush or McCain. Heck, Bush has a high approval rating among all the big parties --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Most ant-climactic boss fight?
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 10:04:55 AM #9	How about ant lion in ff4? --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	imagine allowing elections to be won by land mass rather than popular vote
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 10:01:03 AM #16	It's a group of people. --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	imagine allowing elections to be won by land mass rather than popular vote
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 9:56:24 AM #13	A_Good_Boy posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... Solar_Crimson posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... It's not empty landmasses. It's the widest amount of demographies You mean the inner cities? No. I mean I'd rather someone who appeals to inner city, suburbia, rural areas, retirees, etc be elected because they would be campaigning with the most people in mind which benefits more people. I mean, why should we elect someone who ignores a big demographic? Doesn't the person with the most votes imply that person was most successful at appealing to the widest demographic of people? No. Say there is a household with 6 people that are A, and 1 person each of B, C, D, E and F. Now let's say candadite 1 gets one vote from A, B, C D and E and candadite 2 gets 5 votes from A and 1 from 5. Candidate 2 got more votes but only through two demographies while candadite 1 got one less total vote but over a wider range of people. I'd argue candadite 1 is the better choice for leadership. That was 2016 which is what I assume this topic is referencing --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Was Lindsey Graham right--did the Kavanaugh case help Republicans?
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 9:50:32 AM #2	Yeah. People were pissed that everything turned out the way or did. The guy should have been confirmed almost immediately. I mean it happened right before he was appointed, the girls whole argument was he said/she said and all her witnesses couldn't even validate her claims. It was clearly a politiking move and wasn't subtle. Americans don't play that game --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Nationally, this was a win for Trump and democrats
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 9:47:10 AM #2	Pretty much. Considering that Americans vote in line as a pendulum, this was a great success for the GoP. I've always said that it was a vocal minority that "hate Trump" and I think the results show just that --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	Controversial opinion: Tiny Toons was better than Animaniacs.
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 9:45:21 AM #5	This really isn't a controversial opinion lol --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Topic	imagine allowing elections to be won by land mass rather than popular vote
_B0xxY2J0sHBK__ 11/07/18 9:33:50 AM #8	Solar_Crimson posted... _B0xxY2J0sHBK__ posted... It's not empty landmasses. It's the widest amount of demographies You mean the inner cities? No. I mean I'd rather someone who appeals to inner city, suburbia, rural areas, retirees, etc be elected because they would be campaigning with the most people in mind which benefits more people. I mean, why should we elect someone who ignores a big demographic? --- Green Bay Packers: 3-3-1 Go Pack Go!
Board List	Page List: 1, 2, 3