Lurker > Esrac

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36
TopicPolygon: Gaming's toxic men, explained
Esrac
07/26/18 5:25:48 AM
#81
ssk9716757 posted...
Esrac posted...
Also, because, as someone pointed out earlier, some people just think saying slurs is fun, even if they don't think of themselves as racist or sexist or whatever.


I would argue anyone whos okay with using slurs for fun and doesnt feel any qualms about it has some underlying racist/sexist tendencies.


I think that's a baseless supposition. (Well, maybe not entirely baseless. Racist people do use racist slurs, etc.)

There are a lot of people who just take humor and enjoyment in audacious behavior.

If you think everyone who's ever said an offensive word or slur has some underlying tendency, I think you're taking the issue too seriously.
---
TopicPolygon: Gaming's toxic men, explained
Esrac
07/26/18 5:22:41 AM
#80
ssk9716757 posted...
Esrac posted...
2. Considering the anonymous nature of online gaming, how do we actually know the demographics of people committing "toxic" behavior? Do we have actual data on what percentage white people vs. black people use the N-Word online? Do we have actual data on what percentage of white men vs latino men call someone a homophobic slur online? It seems like the assumption is online toxicity is a white male problem just because its often white males we encounter online. And, I suspect, because social justice minded people (the ones most likely to be having conversations about this) seem to downplay or overlook the bad behavior of women and minorities.


It doesnt really matter whether there are individual women or non-white people who may engage in toxic behavior. The discussion is about a larger problematic culture. And that culture is one that overwhelmingly targets people who are non-white, female, or non-heteronormative.

Also, slightly unrelated, but it does bother me how even discussions where white men arent the victims get turned into discussions about making white men the victims, when the entirety of the harassment being discussed is targeted at everyone but white men. You may be tired of seeing the word toxic online but minorities are tired of the actual toxicity being thrown at them.

3. I disagree with that. I don't think the relative levels of prejudice white people vs black people endure in society at large is a relevant factor. If we should make a hard distinction for one, we should for all. If there wasn't a need to make such a distinction, then why is there such a reaction from white males when articles "explaining" toxic white males show up? Unless you think that kind of reaction is going to occur every time anyone talks about toxicity in gaming.


That reaction is from those people feeling personally attacked. But again, this article is not going to make people who read it think that all white people are like this, whereas a negative story about a group of black people often has (and still does) make people think of all black people more negatively. Thats why the discourse is different.


Everyone gets toxicity thrown at them online. I'm not inclined sympathize with the point of view that puts the harassment women and minorities experience on a pedestal over the harassment white men experience. Seems to me that they're really quick to overlook the harassment white men receive and really quick to point the finger at white men as the source of harassment. And it sure seems like they're willing to overlook the harassment committed by women and minorities.

They can try to argue that their harassment is worse because structural privilege or whatever, but that kind of rhetoric is going to fall on deaf ears.

We literally do have people try to argue that all white people are racist, all men are sexist, etc. That is a thing that happens in some social justice activism circles and I don't think failing to make distinctions helps that kind of mentality. You don't think articles about how toxic white, male gamers are is going to make people at large think less of white, male gamers in general?

Also, I think it's weird that you seem to be suggesting a distinction is unnecessary. That really a step too far?
---
TopicWhat happened to pizzagate and why did Hillary walk away free?
Esrac
07/26/18 4:42:32 AM
#57
I don't think we should make any accusations or conclusive statements without actual evidence.

That said, I do think it's odd that there are so many who are quick to hand-wave away the suggestion that there could be money laundering, sex trafficking, assassinations, or other illegal dealings as the ramblings of madmen (setting Alex Jones aside). As if those kinds of things don't actually happen in the world.

I don't know that any of these claims are true. But I wouldn't be particularly surprised to find out that a corrupt politician or government employee is involved in illicit, illegal activity. It wouldn't be the first time.
---
TopicPolygon: Gaming's toxic men, explained
Esrac
07/26/18 4:34:56 AM
#63
Darmik posted...
Howl posted...
People are terrible to each other online and in online games because they can be and they don't have to witness firsthand the actual effects their words and actions have on the people their vitriol is lodged at.

It has nothing to do with it being "a bunch of white men showing their real hatred." Everyone is shitty to each other online, men women, poc and just about any other demographic you can name.


That doesn't explain why people tend to constantly encounter racist, sexist or homophobic slurs though.

It also doesn't explain why women (like the woman who worked for GameSpot in the article) tend to get targeted more.


I think it does explain it. I mean, most of the insults with the biggest punch involve some kind of racist, sexist, homophobic, neuro-atypical, or develomentally delayed slur. What do you think they're going to call someone online if they want to insult them? A jackanape? A rube? A cotton-headed ninny-muggins? No, if they want to be abrasive, they're going to call them a F-word, R-word, C-word, or N-word.

Also, because, as someone pointed out earlier, some people just think saying slurs is fun, even if they don't think of themselves as racist or sexist or whatever.

I don't know that I believe the claim that women are really targeted more. I suspect everyone has had their share of vitriol hurled at them online, but it's more notable when it happens to a woman because there are fewer women encountered online. Or we're more inclined to notice when a woman is mistreated because it's just background noise to the men. I recall that study a while back regarding harassment online. Men were more likely to encounter most types of harassment (insults, threats, etc), except for sexual harassment and stalking.
---
TopicPolygon: Gaming's toxic men, explained
Esrac
07/26/18 4:25:44 AM
#62
ssk9716757 posted...
Esrac posted...
Darmik posted...
Esrac posted...
It really comes seems like a lot of the same (white, straight) male gamers are a problem. Let's all nod in agreement about what a problem they are


Theres a difference between white, straight, male gamers and the toxic gamers who generally are white, male gamers.

The article is about the latter. Yet people constantly like to bundle themselves into that group for some reason.


I don't think these types of critics make enough of a distinction. Especially when they so often like to make note of the white, straight, male gamers that they think are the problem. I mean, not a whole lot of talk about other demographics behaving badly. Are we to assume they're just so much more well-behaved?

Do you think they would feel the same way if, when talking about, say, crime, we deliberately added the adjectives "black" and "male" in front of the word "criminals" and had a social justice crusade about how awful black, male criminals are? (I mean we have done that kind of thing as a society and most agree that there is racism there.) After all, there is a difference between black males and criminals who are black males.

Yeah, I know, I'm being a bit hyperbolic with that comparison.


For the record any serious studies on crime often do consider the demographics of those committing certain crimes and why that may be the case, the same way this article is asking why a lot of this toxic behavior tends to come from white men.

But the fact is that there isnt as much need to make a distinction because the level of prejudice and racism against white people just isnt the same when compared to black people. People are less likely to use individual events to make blanket judgments about white men as a group the same way they would (and do) with black men, so its more important to be clear and careful when discussing cases involving the latter demographic.


1. Fair point. Yes, actual studies typically do include demographic data. Although, I more had in mind the general conversation/culture war that seems to be going on within gaming and nerd culture. In that I suspect a lot of the people who are real quick to shoot off about the so-called toxicity in white male gamers would be quick to talk about how problematic it would be to denigrate black male criminals with as much enthusiasm.

2. Considering the anonymous nature of online gaming, how do we actually know the demographics of people committing "toxic" behavior? Do we have actual data on what percentage white people vs. black people use the N-Word online? Do we have actual data on what percentage of white men vs latino men call someone a homophobic slur online? It seems like the assumption is online toxicity is a white male problem just because its often white males we encounter online. And, I suspect, because social justice minded people (the ones most likely to be having conversations about this) seem to downplay or overlook the bad behavior of women and minorities.

3. I disagree with that. I don't think the relative levels of prejudice white people vs black people endure in society at large is a relevant factor. If we should make a hard distinction for one, we should for all. If there wasn't a need to make such a distinction, then why is there such a reaction from white males when articles "explaining" toxic white males show up? Unless you think that kind of reaction is going to occur every time anyone talks about toxicity in gaming.

Really getting tired of seeing the word "toxic" so often.
---
TopicPolygon: Gaming's toxic men, explained
Esrac
07/26/18 3:32:19 AM
#44
Doe posted...
I will admit that I silently ree at mainstream casuals sometimes, but normally it's because they are demanding that something with a devoted fandom be altered or watered down for their tastes. Eg the "Ooga booga Gronk summon Gemini Elf. Gronk no like the black and white cards" crowd


I think that is largely why Sarkeesian got such a negative reaction from gaming nerds. Someone with no connection to the community or subculture shows up and starts shitting on the games they love. Its harmful, its problematic, it needs to grow up, this violence is disturbing, etc. And why so many feel her criticisms are invalidated when it was revealed she wasn't actually a gamer.

No one likes it when someone kicks in your door, takes a dumb on your carpet, and blames you when you get pissed about it.
---
TopicHow do people allow themselves to get this fat?
Esrac
07/26/18 3:28:00 AM
#26
The worst part we the family member saying something like "If Kristen doesn't change her eating habits, shes going to lose her mobility."

I just want to grab her and say "You dumb bitch. Stop giving her so much fucking food. If she has to actually get up and go out to get more food, she might actually burn a few calories."
---
TopicTrump is developing helicarriers that shoot people before they commit crimes
Esrac
07/26/18 3:21:20 AM
#2
TopicPolygon: Gaming's toxic men, explained
Esrac
07/26/18 3:18:22 AM
#41
Frolex posted...
We wouldn't be so toxic if people who only started playing games when it got popular would stop invading our space. oh and btw cultural appropriation don't real


I have heard the term "nerd face" before. To describe normies adopting a facade of geekiness for fun. I think it was directed specifically at The Big Bang Theory because it wears the garb of geekdom (and arguably autism), but only to use it as a punchline.
---
TopicPolygon: Gaming's toxic men, explained
Esrac
07/26/18 3:14:57 AM
#40
Darmik posted...
Esrac posted...
It really comes seems like a lot of the same (white, straight) male gamers are a problem. Let's all nod in agreement about what a problem they are


Theres a difference between white, straight, male gamers and the toxic gamers who generally are white, male gamers.

The article is about the latter. Yet people constantly like to bundle themselves into that group for some reason.


I don't think these types of critics make enough of a distinction. Especially when they so often like to make note of the white, straight, male gamers that they think are the problem. I mean, not a whole lot of talk about other demographics behaving badly. Are we to assume they're just so much more well-behaved?

Do you think they would feel the same way if, when talking about, say, crime, we deliberately added the adjectives "black" and "male" in front of the word "criminals" and had a social justice crusade about how awful black, male criminals are? (I mean we have done that kind of thing as a society and most agree that there is racism there.) After all, there is a difference between black males and criminals who are black males.

Yeah, I know, I'm being a bit hyperbolic with that comparison.
---
TopicPolygon: Gaming's toxic men, explained
Esrac
07/26/18 3:03:14 AM
#33
Polycosm posted...
I always thought it had more to do with gaming starting out (or re-emerging after the crash) with a relatively narrow audience of males. Video games were, at one point, primarily a refuge for socially awkward / scorned boys. The industry has exploded into the mainstream over the past 20 - 25 years, but there's this underlying culture, held over from the early days. Those boys (who are now adult men) feel a certain ownership over the domain of games because they bought into it early, were teased about it during their formative years and now it's become a hardened part of their identity.

But that's just my own half-baked view, based largely on personal experience. I haven't read the article yet; tag for later.


I've heard something similar described once. Basically, those scorned and bullied nerdy boys and young men were the early adopters of geek culture. Comics, gaming, etc. They, as the primary consumers and creators (though I think we are probably talking mostly about the consumers here), built the industry through their spending and development. Yes, at least partly as a refuge from normal society that shit on them.

But at some point, geek culture became more socially acceptable and the normal people who didn't nourish the culture in its infancy started to push in and try to set new rules and ostracize those nerds in their own subculture.

Basically, as they may see it, those nerds who built geek culture had their refuge from the normies who shit on them. Those normies eventually realized that the geek stuff could be pretty fun, so they muscled their way in and started shitting on those nerds in their own space.
---
TopicPolygon: Gaming's toxic men, explained
Esrac
07/26/18 2:44:46 AM
#23
Boy, they sure like to use the word "toxic".

Also, after reading your copies excerpts, I don't see any interesting points or perspectives. Nothing that hasn't already been parroted by other social justice activist types many times before.

It really comes seems like a lot of the same (white, straight) male gamers are a problem. Let's all nod in agreement about what a problem they are.

Did they have any point of view that wasn't part of that chorus? That, coming from Polygon, would be more interesting.
---
TopicDo you think racism is still a huge problem in america?
Esrac
07/25/18 3:11:03 PM
#6
ArchiePeck posted...
Yes, it is still ingrained in a lot of systems through legacy. You only need to look at poverty rates and education rates and prison sentence rates to see that African Americans are still proportionally often having things harder.


I've no doubt that active systemic racism still exists against blacks in various sectors. But I also wonder how much of their stalled prosperity is from current, active racist discrimination and how much is from how far down they were pushed by historic racist discrimination.
---
TopicMore Hollywood Celebrities' Tweets Surface Involving Pedophilia and Child Rape
Esrac
07/25/18 4:19:18 AM
#24
They're probably just jokes.

But, then again, its not like child sex abuse in Hollywood is a new concept.
---
TopicWendy's destroyed Steak 'n Shake on Twitter
Esrac
07/25/18 1:11:06 AM
#52
TopicStudent suspended for wearing Trump shirt to receive $25,000 and an apology.
Esrac
07/24/18 10:27:54 PM
#46
Pretty much fair, next.

darkjedilink posted...
cjsdowg posted...
Funny Republicans don't like dumb law suits, until one of their own is getting money.

Only a leftist would think correcting a violation of the First Amendment is a "dumb lawsuit."


That isn't true. They correctly celebrate lawsuits that involve religious violations of the first amendment in schools.
---
TopicTexas waiter made up racist note
Esrac
07/24/18 8:58:04 AM
#12
gmanthebest posted...
ASithLord7 posted...
Welp guess racism doesnt exist then. Medz solves another one!

What's up your ass?


He's salty because he thinks pointing out false claims of racism is equivalent to denying that racism still exists.

If I had to guess.
---
TopicThe problem with James Gunn's jokes imo are
Esrac
07/24/18 8:55:38 AM
#45
Over what time frame were the tweets made and how many were there?

Some people talk like ot was just a few jokes made once a long time ago, but I had heard it was a large number of tweets over several years and that some of the messages were to a convicted pedophile. If so, that does make it a lot creepier.

Granted, I heard that second hand and haven't had the time to verify the claim.
---
TopicTexas waiter made up racist note
Esrac
07/24/18 8:48:07 AM
#6
Were_Wyrm posted...
To the surprise of absolutely no one...


I guess he was taking notes from that lesbian waitress that tried to pull the same scam a while back.
---
TopicIs your mattress on a box-spring or just on the floor?
Esrac
07/24/18 2:57:49 AM
#36
The mattress is on a wooden frame.
---
TopicThis 21 y/o Girl will be the First TRANSGENDER SUPERHERO!! Is She Hot??
Esrac
07/24/18 2:49:20 AM
#25
Monolith1676 posted...
What I don't understand is why feminists aren't mad about transgender people taking things from women. You figure that would be a huge sticking point for them, men becoming women and taking movie/television roles, awards, sports championships away from biological women.


Some of them are.
---
TopicWhich celebrity death affected you the most?
Esrac
07/23/18 8:09:29 PM
#97
If you're willing to count him as a minor celebrity: John Bain, TotalBiscuit. Because I actually watched a log of his content often.

If you mean bigger celebrities only, I was probably most bummed about Robin Williams.
---
TopicRight wing outlets continue to piss their pants over Ocasio-Cortez
Esrac
07/23/18 8:06:14 PM
#29
Antifar posted...
D-Lo_BrownTown posted...
They want you to run her cause they think she can't win.

It's a district that voted 80% Democratic and the GOP nominee is a guy who's main concern seems to be that he got ripped off in family court
http://www.therepublic.com/2018/07/17/us-ocasio-cortez-opponent/
But in his interview, Pappas mostly wanted to talk about his gripes with the judicial system over his decade-long divorce battle, which ended with findings that he was abusive to his wife and even made veiled threats against one judge.

I was motivated by my personal experience, Pappas said.

Pappas says a jury got it wrong when it granted his wife, Maria Pappas, a divorce on grounds of cruel and inhumane treatment. Judge Stanley Gartenstein got it wrong when he interpreted a letter from Pappas saying he may become a crusader as a threat. Judge Hope Schwartz Zimmerman got it wrong in 2013 when she found that Maria Pappas was terrified of the husband and ordered a 20-year restraining order.


How many people actually showed up to vote though?
---
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36