Board List | |
---|---|
Topic | Fucking Aquaman is going to outperform every other DCEU movie. |
Wutobliteration 12/30/18 10:56:10 PM #22 | prince_leo posted... I think blaming them rushing into a team movie is a bit of an easy out. If JL was a good movie, it'd have been fine and made a bunch of money JL is a good movie though. When the movie came out, it received mostly positive reception from audiences. You can tell Snyder gave his best to give the opposite of what BvS was. It was the RT that brought the movie down yet again. Because critics are insanely biased against Zack Snyder no matter what crap he does. |
Topic | Fucking Aquaman is going to outperform every other DCEU movie. |
Wutobliteration 12/30/18 10:18:09 PM #16 | TheoryzC posted... Each of their solo movies perform better and turn out better than the team movie. What does that tell you? this isn't about solo movies. It's about critic scores. Notice how the best performing ones are those with high scores in RT (yes, even Man of Steel got a decent score). box office ratings = movie scores. It's that simple. If the next DCEU movie gets say, 90% RT, I can guarantee you it'll break all box office records. People do crave for DC movies and DC superheroes at this point are more enticing than Marvel's obscure heroes. They're just unsure about quality so they look at the RT overlords to make the decision for them. |
Topic | CE, what is your New Year's resolution? |
Wutobliteration 12/30/18 10:15:40 PM #1 | what is it |
Topic | Trump released a very detailed and very cool design of our future border wall |
Wutobliteration 12/22/18 10:10:38 AM #5 | ThyCorndog posted... ok so he's trolling right trolling like shutting down the government over this? |
Topic | Just bought spider man ps4 + all dlc for $50 on psn sale. |
Wutobliteration 12/22/18 5:01:22 AM #19 | pres_madagascar posted... Comfy_Pillow posted...Game was pretty mediocre. the swinging is so good, I don't know they bothered to add a fast travel option for. The devs really went all out with this game. |
Topic | Just bought spider man ps4 + all dlc for $50 on psn sale. |
Wutobliteration 12/22/18 5:00:08 AM #18 | Comfy_Pillow posted... Game was pretty mediocre. lol are you sure you're playing the game right? you sure you're web-slinging correctly and not just spamming R2? you sure you're even playing the game? nothing in this game is repetitive. Even the crimes and warehouses are varied enough. The sheer amount of main missions alone is equivalent to that of GTA V. And overrated GTA V didn't even have much s*** to do outside of main missions. |
Topic | Why does Hollywood keep rebooting stuff and making sequels over and over? |
Wutobliteration 12/21/18 6:32:27 AM #7 | C_Pain posted... Critic reviews don't mean box office failure. Have you done an analysis on how well these films perform? Have you gathered stats on how many movies they make that are original versus reboot/sequel? almost every movie I see with low critic scores (before the movie was released) would predictably bomb in the box office. It's to be expected. People follow the RT score like it's some guiding light of truth. Y'know why sh***y movies that get low critic scores somehow score big in foreign countries like China? Because RT doesn't exist there. |
Topic | Why does Hollywood keep rebooting stuff and making sequels over and over? |
Wutobliteration 12/20/18 11:26:49 PM #1 | I get it, they wanna play safe with an established audience. But notice how most of these reboots also keep getting panned by critics? And this ultimately plunges the movie down into box office failure anyway. It's ridiculous. |
Topic | Are people born as pedophiles? |
Wutobliteration 12/18/18 2:58:56 AM #1 | and if so, why aren't they seen as accepting as someone who is say, born a gay, or an asexual or a transexual? |
Topic | Can't get a job because of no experience, no experience cuz I can't get a job! |
Wutobliteration 11/18/18 10:09:04 AM #2 | internships bro |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 11:30:36 AM #50 | action52 posted... There is nothing wrong with believing in some sort of divine being as long as you don't let that belief affect what you believe in the realm of science. Like if you believe that God exists outside everything we understand about the universe, but that your job as a scientist is to study the world as we can observe and test it. Your religion affects your beliefs in philosophy and morality but not the natural world or science. Don't bring Christianity in this. I'm just talking about theism/deism in general. It's the hypocrisy that scientists have in how religion clouds science. It doesn't have to be. In the past (in Darwin's time), it wasn't even science vs religion. It was science AND religion. People could co-exist the idea of evolution with a divine creator. Darwin himself proclaimed he reckoned the existence of a divine being. So did Einstein. Darwin was a deist. But then Stephen Hawking didn't. The situation one is in also influences their belief. Nowadays, some have grown too far on the other way, being completely against a divine creator. That's the problem in itself and the paradox. I find it's due to being against religion, the perception of religion. That changes our views. We see ourselves disproving religion and so begin to think more and more, 'ok, a god has no place here'. You think you're seeing from the right perspective, yet limiting that perspective, to one solely on what you can see and what you can hear. Also forget the aliens things. I know I kinda derailed off-topic way back ago. Gotta sleep now gg. |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 11:22:47 AM #45 | You guys should read up on the Fermi Paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox there's simply no explanation for it either. |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 11:20:16 AM #44 | LockeMonster posted... There's a lot wrong in your understanding to begin with. so what are the odds every single 'civilisation' throughout billions of years out there on the tens of billions of planets out there all happen to share the same technological limitations or unfortunate events as humans here on Earth? |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 11:15:02 AM #41 | _Near_ posted... Dragonblade01 posted... that is called deism. It's by far the most 'play-safe' form of thinking as compared to theism. A gnostic atheists is one who outright and completely believes no god can possibly exist. This is also a problem since you're making a claim and can't prove the non-existence of god. Most other people tend to be agnostic athiests. |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 11:10:39 AM #36 | Squall28 posted... Wutobliteration posted...evolution is not a full track in itself but no, I do find it plausible. What I don't find plausible, is the idea that everything works on luck alone. Was the universe created solely by 'luck'? Is the laws of nature all just made by 'luck'? This 'luck' would be required out of an infinite infinite amount of possibilities. see, the funny thing is, going by this logic, it invalidates the argument for aliens. By that logic of probability, the probability of at least one intelligent and advanced alien species coming into noticeable existence would have been FAR greater already. It just doesn't make sense. |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 11:06:05 AM #30 | RoboLaserGandhi posted... Really? You seriously can't see how it's more reasonable to believe in simply another species on another planet as opposed to a supernatural being? just my opinion. Nope. I don't believe in aliens at all. To believe in aliens first requires the assumption that life originate from non-living things. Thus my topic. |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 11:02:33 AM #26 | Dragonblade01 posted... Wutobliteration posted...But if you were to ignore religion and all its teachings however and focus solely on the possibility of a divine existence, then it sounds more plausible, doesn't it? What am I saying is not to leave out the big picture either. You can't say a god created the universe. But neither can you say no god exists thus life HAS to be formed by natural means only. That is what would actually be less plausible. |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 10:58:29 AM #22 | emblem boy posted... Wutobliteration posted...CyricZ posted...I'm not against the idea of a greater being. But you hand me those ones that you came up with so far and I'm like "nah do better". evolution is not a full track in itself but no, I do find it plausible. What I don't find plausible, is the idea that everything works on luck alone. Was the universe created solely by 'luck'? Is the laws of nature all just made by 'luck'? This 'luck' would be required out of an infinite infinite amount of possibilities. How can that be? Unless someone picked out that very one possibility that lead to everything forming as it is today? |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 10:53:52 AM #17 | Dragonblade01 posted... No honest scientist "believes aliens exist" in the same way that people "believe in god." We don't know if there's life somewhere else in the universe. Now, some scientists and other think that their might be extraterrestrial life. The basic idea is that if life is capable of emerging somewhere (here), then it's capable of emerging elsewhere. But we don't actually know that aliens are really out there. Assuming that they are would be incorrect, and downright unprofessional for a proper scientist. the problem is believing that life is even emerges out of something. If you go with that flow of belief, then you're already restricting yourself in your perception and explanations of the universe. I find that the biggest problem many scientists have. They only restrict themselves to the BELIEF that everything works only according to nature. They utterly refuse to include any possibility of an intelligent design, which makes sense, since that can literally never be proven anyway. But that doesn't mean...it isn't a possibility and thus, not possibly true. |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 10:50:37 AM #14 | CyricZ posted... I'm not against the idea of a greater being. But you hand me those ones that you came up with so far and I'm like "nah do better". I'm not exactly that religious but I've been studying up on evolution and how life began and honestly, the way it works is kinda just as ludicrous as how some perceive religion to be. But if you were to ignore religion and all its teachings however and focus solely on the possibility of a divine existence, then it sounds more plausible, doesn't it? No religion, just the existence of a divine being. |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 10:48:06 AM #9 | Caelthus posted... Because the existence of a God requires the defial of all and any known laws of science to exist, by its very nature. The same is not true for aliens - their mere existence does not require any laws of nature to be broken, and fundamentally could exist. yet by our laws of probability, there's no reason aliens they haven't existed yet. There's billions of planets out there. It's insane. like I mentioned in my other post, certainly we would need to disregard the laws of science to accept existence of God but who is to say we need to even apply science to God in the first place? If God created the universe, why should the rules of the universe even apply to God? |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 10:45:24 AM #6 | Squall28 posted... Because an alien life form is something that we could actually comprehend. It'd be similar to us but from a different planet. God is this super abstract thing. His/her existence is a constant paradox, and the explanation we always get is that God is a higher life form that exists outside of our rules. Squall28 posted... Because an alien life form is something that we could actually comprehend. It'd be similar to us but from a different planet. God is this super abstract thing. His/her existence is a constant paradox, and the explanation we always get is that God is a higher life form that exists outside of our rules. and why can't a god exists outside our rules? What makes us think the rules of our world has to apply to everything? or example, time. There's the argument that time is just a social construct. It's what we make up. Or our very concept of reality. There's so many things throughout the universe scientists cannot explain yet have to come up with all kinds of far-reaching hypothesis that they just go along with. |
Topic | Why are scientists with belief in aliens OK but not a belief in a divine being? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 10:37:42 AM #1 | Abiogenesis is a theory scientists like to put out as being how life began but is completely unproven and can probably never be proven fully. There's also been theories like how an alien dropped a seed or some s*** that caused life to begin. Yet somehow that seems more plausible to them than any divine intervention. Why is that? We can't see a god. Yet we can't see aliens either. |
Topic | Why does FO76 look like just some recycled game from Fallout 4? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 2:39:52 AM #18 | RchHomieQuanChi posted... It absolutely amazes me that Bethesda thought a Fallout game without human NPCs was a good idea. they could have at least did it like Borderlands, although Borderlands had to sacrifice by making the NPCs immovable, immortal and untouchable. |
Topic | Why does FO76 look like just some recycled game from Fallout 4? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 2:39:21 AM #17 | Dash_Harber posted... Wutobliteration posted...And the map looks very similiar to FO4. nah, it kinda is. They just added a load of those trees you already saw in FO4 at the beginning of the game. The rest like vehicles and buildings look too astonishingly similiar. Actually, no. They're the same... |
Topic | Why does FO76 look like just some recycled game from Fallout 4? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 2:25:50 AM #10 | LethalAffinity posted... Wutobliteration posted...Also it's beyond me why Bethesda is so clingy to their ridiculous Gamebryo engine (I dont call what stupid name they call it this time, it's still Gamebryo). nope. Todd Howard loves his s****ty engine too much. |
Topic | Why does FO76 look like just some recycled game from Fallout 4? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 2:21:42 AM #7 | Link43130 posted... "we want fallout 4 with multiplayer" - Fans vocal minority of casual snubs. Those clamoring for multiplayer are obviously not real fans of the franchise. |
Topic | Why does FO76 look like just some recycled game from Fallout 4? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 2:21:11 AM #5 | Also it's beyond me why Bethesda is so clingy to their ridiculous Gamebryo engine (I dont know what stupid name they call it this time, it's still Gamebryo). The engine really limits everything they build on. Their open world is as extremely small as always and cities look like towns filled with just a few residents that I'm pretty sure even a caveman community is freaking larger than that. Meanwhile villages look more like a small family living in a few houses. |
Topic | Why does FO76 look like just some recycled game from Fallout 4? |
Wutobliteration 11/17/18 2:19:03 AM #1 | the game graphics look almost exactly the same, save for some extra rays of sunshine. And the map looks very similiar to FO4. Buildings and textures look recycled and the animations are the same as well. I don't know what pre-war Fallout we're talking about. All I'm seeing is another FO4 with multiplayer version added while stripping the game away of every other core single player aspect like NPCs and VATS. I admit I've not played the game yet but srsly, this just looks like some cheap shot grab at the players' wallets. |
Topic | How do you people even live in a country full of guns? |
Wutobliteration 10/30/18 6:28:19 AM #24 | GregShmedley posted... Wutobliteration posted...And why do you even need a gun for self defense? but literally the only defense people can resort to against a gunman is by also having a gun. You can counter melee weapons in many other ways. |
Topic | How do you people even live in a country full of guns? |
Wutobliteration 10/29/18 3:35:46 AM #20 | Dark_Spiret posted... id be worried about 1000 other things that can kill you through-out a normal day than a gun. stay out of certain areas and the chances of dying by a bullet drop to nearly 0. https://www.businessinsider.com/us-gun-death-murder-risk-statistics-2018-3/?r=US&IR=T |
Topic | How do you people even live in a country full of guns? |
Wutobliteration 10/29/18 3:33:53 AM #19 | Zikten posted... if someone wants to kill they will find a way. even in gunless nations, they have knives you can run away from a knife-wielder. you can survive a simple stab wound. one is for the kitchen. The other is purely for killing others. Have you heard of a knife massacre that killed dozens of people at once before? The last I heard was a guy in China trying it at a school. The guy only managed to stab a few, killed nobody. What do you need a gun for? ' 'Oh, for self-defense' And why do you even need a gun for self defense? 'Because there are others that may attack me with a gun too!' So why do you think that other guy has a gun too? |
Topic | How do you people even live in a country full of guns? |
Wutobliteration 10/28/18 2:21:42 PM #2 | Also I known the odds are slim out of millions of people, but still, it's ridiculous how anyone can just carry a one-shot kill weapon on them. Any. Civilian. |
Topic | How do you people even live in a country full of guns? |
Wutobliteration 10/28/18 2:20:49 PM #1 | I can't imagine walking down the street or going to some event like any normal person, yet knowing that anyone around me could so easily be carrying a gun and potentially causing the next murder or massacre. Like seriously wtf? And Americans actually defend this logic using their precious second amendment. |
Topic | god DAYUM. |
Wutobliteration 10/08/18 11:44:13 PM #11 | spudger posted... _BlueMonk posted...Wutobliteration posted...korean beauty has faded for me. There's nothing to admire about when 90% of the girls you see are plastic and look literally alike because of it... yeah but I really don't find them attractive. When you have 90% of the girls all looking attractive due to the exact same modified facial looks... what stands out anymore? |
Topic | CEmen, do you believe in a god or divine entity out there? |
Wutobliteration 10/07/18 12:23:14 PM #19 | shameless bump. |
Topic | CEmen, do you believe in a god or divine entity out there? |
Wutobliteration 10/07/18 9:57:24 AM #10 | Parappa09 posted... probably a divine being out there but who are we to know do you think the divine being created this world or do you mean a divine being that has no relation to our world? |
Topic | CEmen, do you believe in a god or divine entity out there? |
Wutobliteration 10/07/18 5:58:23 AM #5 | I thought this board was anti-religion. So why are so few people voting the 4th option?? |
Topic | god DAYUM. |
Wutobliteration 10/07/18 5:32:32 AM #4 | korean beauty has faded for me. There's nothing to admire about when 90% of the girls you see are plastic and look literally alike because of it... |
Topic | CEmen, do you believe in a god or divine entity out there? |
Wutobliteration 10/07/18 5:30:00 AM #3 | catboy0_0 posted... for me there is lmao vote an option bruh |
Topic | CEmen, do you believe in a god or divine entity out there? |
Wutobliteration 10/07/18 5:29:05 AM #1 | random question - Results (3 votes)
yes, I believe in God. I have a religion I follow.
0% (0 votes)
0
I don't have a religion but do believe a god has to exist...
0% (0 votes)
0
I am agnostic, I believe the divine cannot be known, nor can be proven as non-existent
33.33% (1 vote)
1
no, I believe there's absolutely no god at all.
66.67% (2 votes)
2
|
Topic | Gimme an anime character to draw. I'll draw it with pen within 5-10 minutes. |
Wutobliteration 10/02/18 8:15:38 AM #79 | Mackorov posted... @Wutobliteration like heck I have time for that |
Topic | Well, I can't look at anime the same way again. |
Wutobliteration 09/28/18 10:17:32 AM #8 | video was too long for me. Someone summarize. k thanks |
Topic | Gimme an anime character to draw. I'll draw it with pen within 5-10 minutes. |
Wutobliteration 09/27/18 3:30:59 PM #34 | Darkrobotisback posted... Doe posted...tfw skipped I hate drawing chibi eyes honestly... and @Doe, yours is a GIF |
Topic | Gimme an anime character to draw. I'll draw it with pen within 5-10 minutes. |
Wutobliteration 09/27/18 3:28:11 PM #33 | @Rimmer_Dall @TheMarthKoopa Well anyway here's how I would have drawn if I had sufficient time (took arnd 30 mins) and could actually use a pencil... initial s***t art |
Topic | Gimme an anime character to draw. I'll draw it with pen within 5-10 minutes. |
Wutobliteration 09/27/18 2:57:46 PM #31 | |
Topic | Gimme an anime character to draw. I'll draw it with pen within 5-10 minutes. |
Wutobliteration 09/27/18 2:43:44 PM #26 | ok one more then I'm done... |
Topic | Gimme an anime character to draw. I'll draw it with pen within 5-10 minutes. |
Wutobliteration 09/27/18 2:43:27 PM #25 | |
Topic | Gimme an anime character to draw. I'll draw it with pen within 5-10 minutes. |
Wutobliteration 09/27/18 2:37:00 PM #24 | |
Topic | Gimme an anime character to draw. I'll draw it with pen within 5-10 minutes. |
Wutobliteration 09/27/18 2:24:00 PM #18 | Link43130 posted... https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jjba/images/a/a6/JolyneKujoPro.png/revision/latest?cb=20180410042059 lol knew it... a jojo character |
Board List |