Lurker > IfGodCouldDie

Muffinz0rz posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Lorenzo_2003 posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

DragonGirlYuki posted...

An estate tax is a tax on income that was already taxed. People don't like getting taxed on income they already paid tax on.

Well except that the person that was originally taxed is dead and it's new income for a different person and they haven't been taxed on it.

God fucking damn it, I hate statements like that. Would you guys please stop enabling the government in taxing people out of their own damn money and possessions, please, please? The property was taxed already and yet people keep looking for ways to carve apart its value at every turn. I am convinced that some of you guys, if you had the power to do so, would make it so nobody could own anything and we'd all have to fill out government documents for permission to take a shit.

Trust me man, I hate taxes as much as the next person. I make enough money that the government takes a third of my paycheck. The fact of the matter is he is asking how estate tax can be justified and I am explaining it.

How exactly is it "justified?"

I am not saying it is "justified" just explaining the justification.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Lorenzo_2003 posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

DragonGirlYuki posted...

An estate tax is a tax on income that was already taxed. People don't like getting taxed on income they already paid tax on.

Well except that the person that was originally taxed is dead and it's new income for a different person and they haven't been taxed on it.

God fucking damn it, I hate statements like that. Would you guys please stop enabling the government in taxing people out of their own damn money and possessions, please, please? The property was taxed already and yet people keep looking for ways to carve apart its value at every turn. I am convinced that some of you guys, if you had the power to do so, would make it so nobody could own anything and we'd all have to fill out government documents for permission to take a shit.

Trust me man, I hate taxes as much as the next person. I make enough money that the government takes a third of my paycheck. The fact of the matter is he is asking how estate tax can be justified and I am explaining it.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Muffinz0rz posted...

BLAKUboy posted...

That was already answered, as well.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Well except that the person that was originally taxed is dead and it's new income for a different person and they haven't been taxed on it.

The money itself was already taxed. How can you realistically defend someone losing money like that? (In addition to losing a loved one, no less)

Umm, because they are actually gaining more money than they are losing to tax.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

DragonGirlYuki posted...

An estate tax is a tax on income that was already taxed. People don't like getting taxed on income they already paid tax on.

Well except that the person that was originally taxed is dead and it's new income for a different person and they haven't been taxed on it.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Irony posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Also Black Widows are a more real threat to me than any of those spiders.

A black widow is no where near as dangerous as a funnel webb. Only kids and old people die from black widow bites.

And funnel webbs are not a threat to me as they don't live here.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

God I hope Hollywood burns to the fucking ground. And from it's ashes rises an industry that isn't utter fucking shit.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

PSXer_D5_MkIII posted...

Why dont they make a 4th and 5th bathroom for gays and lesbians

Bathrooms are sexually oriented?
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

sure
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Also Black Widows are a more real threat to me than any of those spiders.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

You're about a month late bud.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Peridiam posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Peridiam posted...

All of our bases now belong to you

FTFY

that's not the opposite, that's just proper grammar

What? It's proper grammer and the opposite of what the original intended to convey. A double whammy.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Peridiam posted...

All of our bases now belong to you

FTFY
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Who is the best in the rap game right now, and who is the GOAT?
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

nayr626 posted...

I'd give him candy.

Maybe he's too poor for a costume? Idk..

---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

just regret it also. That way, if she tries any funny business, you can be all "actually I regret it too, so either we both raped each other or these mutual regrets cancel each other out"

I'm sure if she claimed rape he would regret it lol.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

All depends on tone.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

ProtoManSPx posted...

*sees racist topic*

*waits 3 hours before deleting it*

*sees topic that talks about racists*

*locks it immediately*
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

littlebro07 posted...

People need to stop putting sex on a pedestal.

---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Dash_Harber posted...

Asylum = Hotel = Roanoke = Cult = Murder House > Coven >>> Freakshow.

That's probably the most accurate
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

As long as they stay conscious and don't tell you to stop, then yes.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Is there a higher rate of MtF or FtM or is it negligible?
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Crescent-Moon posted...

Oh it looks like someone just made that replace anyway.

I was reading the current topic to get an idea.

Do you mind if I keep you in mind, in case I need a different one?
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

middle of day 2, 13 people alive.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

I need a replace for our current mafia game. If interested please let me know, either via this topic or PM.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Virus731 posted...

EyeWontBeFooled posted...

A female taking 3 hits for the first time. Yeah, she was going to have a bad time.

I'd say 2 is the sweet spot for a first timer while 3 would probably distort things more than her mind could put back together.

I'm not going to try and humble brag about how many I did the first time but I can assure you nobody believes me when I tell them lol.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

-Unowninator- posted...

Virus731 posted...

Lmfao no. 3 is too much for a first timer because they don't have the coping mechanisms experienced trippers develop.

It's illegal for a reason, you know. (BTW, you quoted me twice; I can't tell if you meant to quote someone else).

Not for a good reason though.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

DifferentialEquation posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

I don't know if there's tons of variations. I'm know there's lots of name brands which are functionally identical. But either way, some women already report side effects from the type of pill they're taking and their doctor simply switches them to another one. There's no reason why women who want to buy their pills OTC couldn't switch to a different type.

According to Google, the price can be anywhere from $10 to $50 depending on if it's generic or a name brand and the type of pill. This would make it easier to access and would most likely drive prices down. Women who have insurance that covers the pill could still go through their doctor. I'm just talking about more options and freedom. And, in general I'd like to see people be able to but things at cheap prices on their own than needlessly go through their doctors and insurance.

As an example. Two weeks ago, I had a really bad flu. I could have immediately went to my doctor and received a prescription. It was much easier and more convenient for me to do buy a bottle of cough syrup for $6 at the grocery store. And note this is a medication that can be dangerous if misused and that some people can potentially have severe allergic reactions too.

You said that "all you're doing is putting more women at risk"? How do you know? And how do you know that there wouldn't be a lot more women that are helped by such a thing. And, beyond that, the pill is an established drug. It's relatively safe and the side effects are well known. There are plenty of dangerous things you can already buy OTC and to not allow the pill is an unnecessary infringement upon women's freedom.

I understand you are trying to be a good guy here but your stance is serverly misguided and your knowledge of the subject is lacking significantly.

What part is wrong or what do you disagree with?

Switching BC all willy nilly, picking a BC that you may not know how it interacts with whatever medication you are currently on, having someone get a prescription to get BC is hardly infringing on a woman's rights.

Alright, but there are warning labels, instructions, etc . that can be printed on medications for women to read.

ACOG also has the opinion that they should be over the counter: https://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Gynecologic-Practice/Over-the-Counter-Access-to-Oral-Contraceptives

I havent gotten a chance to let my wife read this topic yet, but I will tomorrow and have her respond.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

DifferentialEquation posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

I don't know if there's tons of variations. I'm know there's lots of name brands which are functionally identical. But either way, some women already report side effects from the type of pill they're taking and their doctor simply switches them to another one. There's no reason why women who want to buy their pills OTC couldn't switch to a different type.

According to Google, the price can be anywhere from $10 to $50 depending on if it's generic or a name brand and the type of pill. This would make it easier to access and would most likely drive prices down. Women who have insurance that covers the pill could still go through their doctor. I'm just talking about more options and freedom. And, in general I'd like to see people be able to but things at cheap prices on their own than needlessly go through their doctors and insurance.

As an example. Two weeks ago, I had a really bad flu. I could have immediately went to my doctor and received a prescription. It was much easier and more convenient for me to do buy a bottle of cough syrup for $6 at the grocery store. And note this is a medication that can be dangerous if misused and that some people can potentially have severe allergic reactions too.

You said that "all you're doing is putting more women at risk"? How do you know? And how do you know that there wouldn't be a lot more women that are helped by such a thing. And, beyond that, the pill is an established drug. It's relatively safe and the side effects are well known. There are plenty of dangerous things you can already buy OTC and to not allow the pill is an unnecessary infringement upon women's freedom.

I understand you are trying to be a good guy here but your stance is serverly misguided and your knowledge of the subject is lacking significantly.

What part is wrong or what do you disagree with?

Switching BC all willy nilly, picking a BC that you may not know how it interacts with whatever medication you are currently on, having someone get a prescription to get BC is hardly infringing on a woman's rights.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

DifferentialEquation posted...

I don't know if there's tons of variations. I'm know there's lots of name brands which are functionally identical. But either way, some women already report side effects from the type of pill they're taking and their doctor simply switches them to another one. There's no reason why women who want to buy their pills OTC couldn't switch to a different type.

According to Google, the price can be anywhere from $10 to $50 depending on if it's generic or a name brand and the type of pill. This would make it easier to access and would most likely drive prices down. Women who have insurance that covers the pill could still go through their doctor. I'm just talking about more options and freedom. And, in general I'd like to see people be able to but things at cheap prices on their own than needlessly go through their doctors and insurance.

As an example. Two weeks ago, I had a really bad flu. I could have immediately went to my doctor and received a prescription. It was much easier and more convenient for me to do buy a bottle of cough syrup for $6 at the grocery store. And note this is a medication that can be dangerous if misused and that some people can potentially have severe allergic reactions too.

You said that "all you're doing is putting more women at risk"? How do you know? And how do you know that there wouldn't be a lot more women that are helped by such a thing. And, beyond that, the pill is an established drug. It's relatively safe and the side effects are well known. There are plenty of dangerous things you can already buy OTC and to not allow the pill is an unnecessary infringement upon women's freedom.

I understand you are trying to be a good guy here but your stance is serverly misguided and your knowledge of the subject is lacking significantly.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

It really was, a Shawshank Redemtion.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Asherlee10 posted...

Then your quoted sentences do not follow correctly. The first sentence disagrees with me. The second sentence kind of does...?

I just quoted the whole post, it was in response to someone that clearly had no experience with kids. Sorry for the confusion.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Asherlee10 posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Asherlee10 posted...

1. Your toddler may be teething. A frozen washcloth (clean) for them to bite on can help that urge and sooth it.

Thing is neither were teething at the time and it was very apparent they were doing it for the luls.

Asherlee10 posted...

2. Firm feedback (like the person that said they let their child know that biting really hurts)

This was actually ineffective.

Asherlee10 posted...

If firm feedback is not needed (i.e. this is the first or second time it's happened), an explanation of why biting is bad. Again, you'd be surprised at how much a 2 year old can be reasoned with.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

You obviously don't have any experience with children if you think this. Children are absolutely capable of reason as early as 2 years old, if not earlier.

So, your response is that you'd rather assume that I have experience with children?

No. I was just pointing out that I already mentioned children's ability to reason as early as two.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Asherlee10 posted...

1. Your toddler may be teething. A frozen washcloth (clean) for them to bite on can help that urge and sooth it.

Thing is neither were teething at the time and it was very apparent they were doing it for the luls.

Asherlee10 posted...

2. Firm feedback (like the person that said they let their child know that biting really hurts)

This was actually ineffective.

Asherlee10 posted...

If firm feedback is not needed (i.e. this is the first or second time it's happened), an explanation of why biting is bad. Again, you'd be surprised at how much a 2 year old can be reasoned with.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

You obviously don't have any experience with children if you think this. Children are absolutely capable of reason as early as 2 years old, if not earlier.

---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Asherlee10 posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Asherlee10 posted...

The_OD posted...

So, who here thinks that if a kid bites their parent, and the parent bites them back, makes the parent bad??

Why would you think that acting like a toddler to your toddler is good parenting?

I have bitten both my children back, granted it was not a legitimate bite and it was more just putting my mouth on them. It was an example of "do you like it? then don't do that to others." Providing examples to help them develop empathy is very important in development.

There are a multitude of ways to teach a toddler not to bite that doesn't involve biting back.

Such as?
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

refmon posted...

They've been sedated for so long on that site.

Do they even remember how to do that anymore?

I am asking how many "neogaffers" are going to be CEmen alts pretending to be from neogaf just to stir up shit.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Do you think are just going to be alts created to stir up shit.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

SArm_v2_0 posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

xBloodBrotherx posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

xBloodBrotherx posted...

I don't think biting your kids has anything to do with developing empathy.

Do you understand what empathy is?

"How can you teach your kid that biting hurts people and not to do it unless you bite them?" - IfGodCouldDie

Please enlighten me, how would you handle the situation? I feel like you have never been bitten by a kid. It's not something that feels very good.

My 2 year old bit me about a month ago. My loud, painful scream scared the shit out of her, and she hasn't done it since. There were a couple of situations where we were play fighting/wrestling and she pretended like she was going to bite me, but that always brought play time to a screeching halt. She remembered the one time she did bite me, and she backed off.

I'm not saying this works for every child. Just explaining that in my case I didn't have to retaliate. I was a biter for a few months when I was a kid, and my babysitter bit me back. My parents said I cried but I continued biting for a while.

Fair enough, and like I said when I "bit" them it was less of an actual bite and more me just putting my mouth on them. It was enough to teach them that it was not nice and neither of them ever bit again.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Is neogaf done as a website, because I don't see myself leaving the boards I frequent the most as I mostly come to gamefaqs to play mafia more than anything.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

masterpug53 posted...

Playing Final Fantasy 3/6 at age 11 was the turning point when video games turned from a hobby into a lifestyle / art form.

---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

xBloodBrotherx posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

xBloodBrotherx posted...

I don't think biting your kids has anything to do with developing empathy.

Do you understand what empathy is?

"How can you teach your kid that biting hurts people and not to do it unless you bite them?" - IfGodCouldDie

Please enlighten me, how would you handle the situation? I feel like you have never been bitten by a kid. It's not something that feels very good.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

xBloodBrotherx posted...

I don't think biting your kids has anything to do with developing empathy.

Do you understand what empathy is?
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

hockeybub89 posted...

And spoilers: it doesn't work. Parenting is supposed to be hard. It isn't about shutting down annoyances quickly. It is about developing the best person you can.

This is the biggest thing people don't realize.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

RockRapDubstep posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Asherlee10 posted...

The_OD posted...

So, who here thinks that if a kid bites their parent, and the parent bites them back, makes the parent bad??

Why would you think that acting like a toddler to your toddler is good parenting?

I have bitten both my children back, granted it was not a legitimate bite and it was more just putting my mouth on them. It was an example of "do you like it? then don't do that to others." Providing examples to help them develop empathy is very important in development.

The fuck?

xBloodBrotherx posted...

IfGodCouldDie posted...

I have bitten both my children

This is why CEmen shouldn't have kids.

You guys don't think empathy is important?
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

Asherlee10 posted...

The_OD posted...

So, who here thinks that if a kid bites their parent, and the parent bites them back, makes the parent bad??

Why would you think that acting like a toddler to your toddler is good parenting?

I have bitten both my children back, granted it was not a legitimate bite and it was more just putting my mouth on them. It was an example of "do you like it? then don't do that to others." Providing examples to help them develop empathy is very important in development.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes

marc55 posted...

Yaridovich posted...

scorpion41 posted...

SophieLuvsTofu posted...

scorpion41 posted...

SophieLuvsTofu posted...

3) Kids are too young to understand spanking.

No, theyre too young to rationalize why something is wrong. But, they can associate physical pain with doing something theyre not supposed to do as long as the spanking is administered with purpose. Spanking or hitting with no purpose is why the act has garnered so much negativity.

But I mean in that same sense can't you just associate verbal reprimanding with something they're not supposed to do?

It's the same result...just...no hitting.

Lol no. Verbally reprimanding a 3-4 year old is as good as scolding a dog. Theyll forget it as soon as the moment has passed.

Do you actually believe this? My nephew, my sister--I verbally reprimanded them at that age for a wide variety of things and they remembered, they listened.

ive seen it happen
as soon as the one who told them not to do something leaves the room
they do it
like standing on a chair or climbing on top of a table

That has less to do with them forgetting and more to do with them pushing boundaries. A child's sole purpose in life is to explore and learn, that includes what is right, what is wrong, what they can get away with.
---

Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes