Lurker > StealThisSheen

The 43-year-old officer, who has not been identified, was responding to a car crash Wednesday when a 28-year-old man who was involved in the accident struck her in the face, then repeatedly smashed her head against the pavement until she passed out. He said the attack went on for several minutes and that two others officers were injured as they tried to pull the suspect away

This very much sounds like the attacker only stopped because either somebody finally physically stopped him, or he assumed the woman was dead.

Saying that's a better outcome than shooting the guy attacking her just because she happened to live is pretty disgusting.
---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Corrik posted...

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Corrik posted...

redrocket_pub posted...

Why is anyone even engaging a person who pretends to not understand the moral and legal differences between emergency medical care and what that cop was trying to pull?

It is funny how you say stuff like this while Kenri literally just said drawing someone's blood is assault and that it is better a cop was beaten and could have been killed instead of use force to stop a criminal.

What would YOU call drawing someone's blood without consent?

And also where did Kenri literally say a cop should have been beaten and maybe killed?

He said the woman who feared to use her weapon cuz the backlash over if she was wrong was a better outcome than her using force to stop a criminal who beat her and I think 2 other officers severely.

I don't want to gloss over how dumb Corrik is being, but this is pretty dumb, yeah.

Like, we shouldn't need to try to out-crazy Corrik, here.
---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Vlado posted...

Show me some proof that the woman in question is in any way related to the Russian government, and I'll consider the possibility. You won't because there isn't any. If there was, the globalist media would've exploded already months ago.

"MOSCOW — The Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. last year after his father had won the Republican nomination for president had once represented Russia’s top intelligence agency in court, according to at least two public records.

The lawyer, Natalia V. Veselnitskaya, who is now at the center of the political intrigue over the Trump campaign’s possible collusion with Russia during Donald J. Trump’s presidential campaign, represented a military unit founded by the Russian Federal Security Service in 2002, publicly available records show.

The service, known as the F.S.B., is the successor agency to the K.G.B. and was once headed by President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia."

Are you really going to say she's just some random lawyer

Don't you think that's awfully coincidental
---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Vlado posted...

Imagine still believing CNN after "gems" like these...

More useful watching:

You are literally posting in support and belief of a conspiracy theory created by InfoWars

You literally have no footing to stand on to call anybody out for sources they believe.
---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Not_an_Owl posted...

So there's this:

http://gizmodo.com/yes-google-uses-its-power-to-quash-ideas-it-doesn-t-li-1798646437

tl;dr journalist in 2011 learns Google prioritizes results that get engagement on Google Plus and reports that fact; Google pressures her employer to take the story down and then prevents any trace of the original story from being found via Google search.

With the caveat that the story isn't sourced and relies solely on the writer's own memories, that is shady as fuck.

While it's definitely shady if they actually scrubbed it from Google searches, her headline and premise of "‘Put a Plus One button on your pages or your search traffic will suffer.’" is incredibly click-baity. The idea is that more popular search results (ones that got more +1s) will appear higher up in searches, so, yes, a site that doesn't include a +1 button would be at a disadvantage. But that's just a natural disadvantage from choosing not to use something that could get you more attention. The title, and the way she uses words like "suffers" (and originally used "dies) suggest Google was going out of its way to screw over people who didn't include the button, which simply wasn't true.

So while Google's actions were shady, her using the info for what amounts to click-bait was also pretty shady.
---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Jakyl25 posted...

Okay so basically the truth is that the khaki shorts man is literally ONLY ON CAMERA when we see the khaki shorts, and every other time you see the red coat, it's the reporter.

I finally understand

Right. That's what I was trying to say.

I wasn't trying to say you see two different people facing/talking to the camera. We never see Khaki Shorts's face.
---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

So it is two people, after all:

https://twitter.com/HashtagGriswold/status/903276078344663045

You can hear Griffin's footsteps as he's still running, and khaki guy isn't moving/barely takes a step when you hear Griffin take several. So he really did just run past another crew member who was also in a red CNN coat.
---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

...I mean, I guess that's possible. But who tucks their coat into their pants. I think I'd sooner believe it's fake than believe that there is a man out there who tucks his coat into his pants.
---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Eschamp is amazing and I want one
---

SEP Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid! http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/456/2z6v0qcgif.gif

Machamp
---

SEP Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid! http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/456/2z6v0qcgif.gif