Lurker > streamofthesky

Nope.

Slacks, shorts, or sweat pants. Never jeans. Never a baseball cap or giant belt buckle...or belt in general. T-shirts are cool, though. Nothing wrong w/ t-shirts.

Can't go wrong w/ yogurt, never had almond milk yogurt, but almond milk is good and cow milk yogurt is good, so presumably that's also fine.

The vegan burger looks gross and the bun looks like really crappy/cheap bread. The mix your wife made looks decent.

SunWuKung420 posted...

Six people were arrested and a number of injuries reported as approximately 2,000 people congregated in the Southwest Residential Area of campus, according to school officials."

There was only 3 arrests in Philly.

So your argument is that police in MA do their jobs better than police in PN?

Presidents have very little to do w/ stock prices, both when they go up and when they go down. It's the same for D's and R's.

But Trump has clung to the stock prices and economy as his one saving grace for why he's a good president, so it's especially hilarious for a market crash to happen while he's in office.

About fucking time!

It's been a bull market for like 9 damn years now. Was unemployed until a few years ago, and by the the time I was able to save up, it was back to around the "record highs" before the crash and I felt super uncomfortable gambling my savings on it continuing to go up. Been waiting years for a crash or at least correction. If it drops 10% I might actually put some money in stocks. If it drops 20% or more, I almost certainly will.
Right now, even w/ those losses it's still probably near the peak, so still overvalued. The Price to Earnings ratio's been out of control for years now w/ no repercussions....thanks, Federal Reserve :(

TheCyborgNinja posted...

streamofthesky posted...

MadTV dying out and SNL living on is a great example of how there is no justice in this world.

What a bleh, un-funny, stupid sketch.

And there's nothing to "deal with" on that topic unless you honestly believe false accusations never exist.

MadTV died because all their viewers grew tired of it becoming The Stuart and Miss Swan Show. At that same time, SNL was still decent and that was that. By the time MadTV got good again, there weren't enough viewers to care. They had some really good sketches towards the end :/

I always hated the Stuart sketches. Ms. Swan was generally grating but had some funny sketches, especially the one where she fought the ninjas and her whole going home story arc.

LinkPizza posted...

streamofthesky posted...

I remember in college, a local sports team won the championship in their sport and people on campus rioted, and I thought it was the stupidest fucking thing ever. Your team won, why the fuck would you want to destroy stuff and rampage?

Saw some guys I knew from high school, generally level-headed moderately intelligent people, saying they were going out "to riot." I asked why, and they just said, "everybody's doing it!"
I went back to my dorm, but apparently there were literal dumpster fires, cars overturned, and all sorts of other property destruction.
What really pissed me off was that in the end every student's family got a bill to pay for the damages. That's fucking bull shit, even the ones not involved. I wish the police had fucking tear gassed and tazed the lot of them and took down the identities of all involved / photographic evidence and made THOSE jerks and only them pay for the damages. Still angry about it. Sports is fucking stupid.

That's insane. Could they really just make people pay for damages just because they went to that school?

Apparently legally they can, and did. My parents paid it, but the principle of it still upsets me, and they obviously were mad, too. It was a few hundred dollars in damages per student, so it must have been pretty bad.

EDIT: And I mean, think about it. Who's gonna pay for the damage done in Philly now? The taxpayers, either city-wide or state-wide. Cops need to ID as many of the property-destroying bastards as possible and only bill them. Hell, do a wide sweep and bill anyone in the crowds, whether you saw them personally set shit on fire or not. At least they were involved, so it's still more fair than charging people who sat at home and did nothing wrong.

I remember in college, a local sports team won the championship in their sport and people on campus rioted, and I thought it was the stupidest fucking thing ever. Your team won, why the fuck would you want to destroy stuff and rampage?

Saw some guys I knew from high school, generally level-headed moderately intelligent people, saying they were going out "to riot." I asked why, and they just said, "everybody's doing it!"
I went back to my dorm, but apparently there were literal dumpster fires, cars overturned, and all sorts of other property destruction.
What really pissed me off was that in the end every student's family got a bill to pay for the damages. That's fucking bull shit, even the ones not involved. I wish the police had fucking tear gassed and tazed the lot of them and took down the identities of all involved / photographic evidence and made THOSE jerks and only them pay for the damages. Still angry about it. Sports is fucking stupid.

Last Finished: Nier Automata and Samurai Warriors 4
Last played: Warriors All-Stars (wasn't enjoying it, so I never finished it)
Currently playing: Deception IV - Nightmare Princess

Off the top of my head, my most-hated companies (probably forgetting some):

Apple
Comcast
Verizon (how the fuck is Sprint more hated than A Shit Pie's company?)
Disney (copyright law)
Equifax
Fox / Rupert Murdoch's media empire
United Airlines (yeah, Spirit is worse, but you expect them to be awful for the price)
Monsanto
Facebook
Twitter
Activision Blizzard (use the full name, damn it! Blizzard's evil, too)
EA
Warner Bros

Zeus posted...

streamofthesky posted...

Bagamak posted...

alot of times those most zealous about nazis are the ones most acting like nazis.

A lot more times, the ones who seem to oddly and fervently feel the need to defend nazis are more likely to....

and fuck, can't finish that sentence b/c unlike you, I'd get modded for it.

Oh, is that like the old, "If you defend a gay man, that means you're gay?" or "Maybe you're standing up for a Jew because you're secretly Jewish?" You know, the classic baseless allegation hurled by people to bully critics picking apart your bullshit into silence?

He literally made the argument first and I turned it back at him. But what a shock which side you chose to attack despite that.

Bagamak posted...

alot of times those most zealous about nazis are the ones most acting like nazis.

A lot more times, the ones who seem to oddly and fervently feel the need to defend nazis are more likely to....

and fuck, can't finish that sentence b/c unlike you, I'd get modded for it.

How fucked up would it be if shooting unarmed citizens doesn't get a cop fired, but removing a nazi flag does?

Dynalo posted...

Zeus posted...

Supposedly gen eds also exist to provide added funding to less successful departments.

Bingo. And just help fund the school in general, but primarily to fund departments that wouldn't survive otherwise. If it was just to fund the school in general, it would be "Take 10 electives of your choice".

Joelypoely posted...

I disagree. University is meant to provide you with a broad education to help you think critically, write proficiently and have an expansive understanding of the world we live in. If university has become little more than meeting future job requirements we may as well do away with them altogether. If you don't enjoy the process of educating yourself why attend university in the first place?

If that's the purpose, it's doing a really poor job of it.

I had one friend who had to take a "Humanities Elective" in his final year. He chose Sociology, went to the first class, and saw the syllabus. He decided that that class looked like entirely too much work for a "bullshit class" and immediately walked out and dropped it. Then signed up for something else that would require less work. How did that help him "think critically" or "expand the world we live in"? People just flock to whatever classes they can do the best in for the least amount of effort. Talk to any of the people with more structured schedules (CS, engineering, sciences, etc) and ask the students there which electives they took. 90% of them will give you the same answer - because they knew that specific class was easiest.

Well, since you asked...while it's true I took theater as an art elective b/c I suck at art and theater was stupidly easy, for the most part I did choose gen ed electives that interested me, including Japanese (foreign language), several Philosophy classes (somehow managed to cover Letters *and* communication gen ed requirements just w/ them, plus an Engineering Ethics class on top of all that), hell I think even my Human Sexuality class counted towards some gen ed...
Loved my gen eds, they were a lot of fun, plus unlike engineering classes...there were girls. It was funny too, had a few friends who were Philosophy majors and I'd consistently get better grades than them in their own major. :D

I agree it's good to present a broad education to college students and not just make them pure job mills where you learn a specific skill set and nothing else. How dull. And damn, if I had to take NOTHING but math, physics, and engineering classes for my entire bachelor's degree, that'd truly have been awful.

Lokarin posted...

You don't make money by producing a product, but by preventing anyone else from

Or follow the Apple model: Do that, plus buy out anyone who does produce a good product and lay claim to it. Also, prioritize marketing above all else.

HitomiKagewaki posted...

streamofthesky posted...

They were giving the government an interest-free loan on that amount throughout the prior year.
They're the suckers, you did well.

I usually end up owing a lot and yeah it sucks, but better to have had it accruing bank interest at least. Though a significant amount of what I owe is from bank interest since that's added in last, and then taxed massively itself since the standard deduction and lowest tier of the tax range are gone by then....

How much interest did you make? I seriously doubt it exceeds inflation. I never did understand the premise or mentality of owing the IRS money, just boggles my mind.

0.5%, roughly

Not much, but more than $0.
Besides, owing some money means identity thieves can't file a fake return in my name and get money.

Troll_Police_ posted...

soon to be getting a return instead of paying in for the first time in years

thanks trump

If by "soon" you mean in 12 months. Filing now is for last year's taxes...

FellWolf posted...

streamofthesky posted...

"You shouldn't have messed with me, because i am tougher than a bullet." I mean, just...what commentary can I even add to that to make it sound even more pathetic?

That was the girl saying that

Oh, wow. Sounded like the sort of lame thing one of them would say. I guess for her it's fair since she withstood a bullet. Still a cheesy line.

So, the parents are going to jail for 20 years, right?

Cause holy shit!

Such Xbox dude bros

- Would rather play Xbox shooters w/ their bro than get laid
- Quick to anger and violence over trivial things
- Piss poor shots with actual guns
- "You shouldn't have messed with me, because i am tougher than a bullet." I mean, just...what commentary can I even add to that to make it sound even more pathetic?

They were giving the government an interest-free loan on that amount throughout the prior year.
They're the suckers, you did well.

I usually end up owing a lot and yeah it sucks, but better to have had it accruing bank interest at least. Though a significant amount of what I owe is from bank interest since that's added in last, and then taxed massively itself since the standard deduction and lowest tier of the tax range are gone by then....

Matt118 posted...

...are you most excited about?

Am I the only one who asked, what about Radiant Historia: Perfect Chronology?

Nope, I was upset it wasn't in the list.

First thought: Isn't she the same Democrat that got the gift of Todd Akin a few years ago? Why do the weirdos keep coming out of the wood-work to challenge her for her seat?
Zeus posted...

Fun reminder: Craven Claire McCaskill sponsors outlandish Republican candidates so they can win their primaries but lose to her in the general election. She spent $1.7m helping Todd "legitimate rape" Akin in 2012. In her own words: "As it turned out, we spent more money for Todd Akin in the last two weeks of the primary than he spent on his whole primary campaign."

Ah...so it is.
And boo hoo. All she did was give money to his campaign. Republicans in her state were still dumb enough to vote for Mr. "Legitimate [r-word]" Akin and that's on them.
Are you claiming that a massive imbalance in two competing candidates' campaign funding can single-handedly swing an election? Isn't it the Republican mantra that unlimited campaign contributions thanks to Citizens United isn't a problem?
So much irony!

AllstarSniper32 posted...

BlueScum posted...

Bedazzled

The devil is literally too hot in this movie.

This movie, for that reason. :)

But after that, probably Encino Man (glad to see it getting a bunch of votes) then the Mummy.

Snapshot stories? You mean these?

I played it once, got at least 95% through the plot where you go back to the starting city and just...never finished. I don't know, just didn't feel like it.

Golden Road posted...

It's a long game. I'm surprised by how many people have beaten it 4+ times, really.

A long, mediocre game.

Why would you give that blowhard ratings by watching?

I've never bothered to watch a SotU and certainly won't be starting now.

MadTV dying out and SNL living on is a great example of how there is no justice in this world.

What a bleh, un-funny, stupid sketch.

And there's nothing to "deal with" on that topic unless you honestly believe false accusations never exist.

I find dress clothes uncomfortable too, I think they're supposed to be that way. Even getting sized, they're just restrictive as hell.
You didn't even mention the pants. I'll let our distinguished former president, LBJ, cover that topic:
https://youtu.be/S3GT9UN7nDo?t=116

NeoSioType posted...

-Top button chokes the Adam's apple
-Fitting sleeves roll up halfway when bending arms
-Back might rip holding arms out front, lol
-Upper arm movement generally restricted
-Tucked shirt isn't long enough for comfortable waist movement
-Shoes have terrible bend when walking

- Whatever your neck is measured to be, get dress shirts at least half an inch larger in circumference. Dress shirts list the collar measurement.
- If the wrist buttons are in, it shouldn't ride up that much, but yes it's still annoying
- Like the neck, whatever your torso measurement is, get a shirt that's a bit larger.
- Nothing you can do about this, even an oversized dress shirt is restrictive like that and yes, it sucks.
- Get a longer shirt? Mine are usually longer than I'd like, to the point that tucking them in is annoying, so much fabric.
- What kind do you have? Good loafers can be reasonably comfy, since they're effectively fancy-looking slippers.
These aren't the exact pair I have, but look similar and same brand name:
http://www.sears.com/giorgio-brutini-men-s-higgins-brown-dress-loafer/p-067VA92403312P?sid=IDx01192011x202448499

The attackers are all 18+, don't call them boys. Thankfully they'll be tried as adults and hopefully go to prison for a long time.
Victim's probably going to have CTE later in life from this, too.

Ben111 posted...

Beating someone up will totally not have any consequences
Like wth are people really this dumb?

Full Throttle posted...

...playing XBOX One...

I mean....

No, generally.

I like to watch badminton, volleyball (beach and indoor, but mainly the former), gymnastics, and various martial arts.

Hate all of the major sports, I guess basketball is decent...

I play games to have fun, not to prove my "733+ skillz"

Normal difficulty is usually what I play. Sometimes harder modes if there's a reason to (extra story content, unlock the best gear...at least till I get certain items I want, I'm no completionist), sometimes easier modes if the game seems tough or I really don't care about being challenged by the gameplay (RPGs I play for the story first and foremost, whatever lets me experience the whole story I'll do) or want to use a sub-optimal build for fun.

Also only play single player or local co-op, not against other players except for Smash Bros. I guess.

Ok, this is confusing.

Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Vermont, and Washington are the only states that currently issue EDLs.

(Enhanced Drivers License)

So if you don't live in one of those states and you're traveling by air domestically...you're fucked? EDIT: In 2020. Still.

I just got a new license a few months ago and apparently it's not an EDL.... That's fucking bull shit, I'm not paying for a new license by Oct 2020 when the one I just got is valid for five fucking years past that!

Lokarin posted...

Take your Flu Shots if you haben't already

The flu shot takes weeks to begin "working." It's why sensible people get it late in the year instead of waiting till the middle of winter. If you got a flu shot tomorrow, the outbreak would be over before it protected you at all.

Course, there could be another outbreak in Feb so it's still worth getting it, but it's not gonna help right now if you waited.

How is this even a question?

PS2 is one of the best consoles ever released (tough choice between it, SNES, and PS1) and the original Xbox one of the worst. If original Xbox looks good today, it's only because of how bad the Xbone is and lower standards.

Hell, whenever someone claims a console is better than another b/c it's more powerful, PS2 compared to Xbox is the first example used to prove how wrong it is to equate power with being better.
(though it's hard to think of a gen where the most powerful console was the best one and/or the best selling; PS4 could've broken the cycle this gen but then Xbox One X came out, most powerful but still underselling the competitor)

I wish it was a true shut down, with all federal government functions ceasing. A day or two of experiencing that and we'd have a solid decade or so of no one ever bitching about how the government is worthless and a waste of money or does anything for me, etc...

Same. It's why I seldom buy cashews and when I do, only the small ~ 10 oz. containers. Once I open it, I've eaten half of the container before I know it.
Damn things are way too addicting and unhealthy to be from nature.

Ok, then definitely should have taken the annuity.

pionear posted...

streamofthesky posted...

In principle I'd prefer the 20 year pay out based on the financial logic/math.
In reality...your payments cease if you die, and I'd be too damn paranoid about giving powerful groups a large vested interest in my early death.

For a 20 year old guy, yea that would seem logical.

But I think you can will the rest of your payments to whoever in case of death, I believe.

Can you? I was told that once you're dead, the payments cease to continue, and you can't "will" them to someone else.

Admittedly, I haven't looked into the topic much because it's not an issue I'll ever need to be concerned about.

What a fucking joke. Got offered a nothing 2 year sentence which was already a better deal than her victims would've ever been offered, then a judge tries to offer her an even better deal of 1 year (seriously, wtf?!) and she turns that down, too.
Must be nice being a white female in our judicial system.
Watch her not even get close to the 6 year maximum despite all she's done and all the lies.

Yes, Stalin was also a moron. Russia's hilariously pathetic showing in the Winter War (a war of conquest 100% the fault of Russia) is usually cited as encouraging hitler to think Russia would be easy to defeat and effectively hastened the two going into conflict.
Both were colossal idiots. They were charismatic and ruthlessly evil which helped them gain power, but shockingly...the tools that help one gain power aren't necessarily the best ones for using it wisely.

shadowsword87 posted...

streamofthesky posted...

and that Russia's "heroics" weren't intentional but a "hoist by his own petard" moment where Stalin had allied w/ hitler out of convenience and was betrayed and caught by surprise.

Minor correction, but nobody was surprised when Germany attacked Russia.
Stalin was using the treatise as a way to literally pick up the factories and move them beyond the Ural mountains, and needed all of the time possible. Which is why they had to have so much defensive fighting before the factories could kick into gear.

Them going into conflict wasn't surprising, and Stalin planned to attack Germany at some point, iirc. Just the timing of it, happening so soon, and hitler striking first caught Stalin by surprise. That's what I meant.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

streamofthesky posted...

Britain wouldn't have been able to halt the nazi advance on the western and African fronts w/o the weapons being sent from the U.S.

Sold, not sent. America's most successful period in history was off the back of extorting the allies with unreasonable cost for supplies.

In fact America joined the war because of Pearl Harbour, which was triggered by extorting Japan on oil prices to the degree that expansionism was a more financially viable strategy than dealing with America. Japan couldn't afford to be an American tributary so expanded regardless and took the first strike in the war America threatened if they refuse to subjugate themselves to them.

To be fair, the U.S. was trying to be coy and play semi-"neutral" and claim they're not involved in the war. Just selling arms for money like the good capitalists they were. If they straight up gave the British arms for free, that thin veneer would've dissolved quickly.
It's still a bit messed up and in the end wasn't fooling anybody, but a lot of Americans at the time were isolationist, so FDR had to perform his little rhetorical dance.

And yes, also aware that the Pearl Harbor attack was hardly "unprovoked," and it's a shame that part's seldom taught.

RoboXgp89 posted...

Germany could have easily won that war hitler was an idiot
statlin didn't even know what artillery was like 10million soldiers just cut off with no food or anything running up against machine guns with no medics nothing
hitlers army invaded stalingrad and they would have taken it had they brought some winter gear
also everyone in ukraine was still pissed at statlin when the nazi's arrive so what do they do? they start purging the populace of foreigners turning ukraines allegience back to russia not to mention all of their hard laborers they could have fed instead of starved
nazism actually killed Germany not the other way around... though they did kill a lot of people too

Oh, no doubt.
hitler was a moron of historical proportions and too few realize this.
Just read about his command structure and how twisted and confusing it was to the point that it bogged down any military decision-making.
Or the fact that he invaded Russia in the first place b/c of his racist view of Slavs and hatred of communism, when if he simply focused on the Western front, he could've overpowered Britain before U.S. could even get involved.

He was a complete fucking moron, but because he had a powerful German war machine (here's a tip: Germany was a dominant military power for the past 100 years or so by that point, they didn't just suddenly become so strong) and some talented generals, he's often thought of as some sort of evil genius or great conquerer. It's disturbing and sad.

Except they don't.

The elderly are their biggest age demographic for voting.
And they're constantly pushing trickle down economics to make things easier for corporations and the extremely wealthy. While you could see their attempts to gut the social safety net as them wanting the weak (poor) to die off, and I wouldn't argue w/ you, no actual "social Darwinist" thinks the strong need outside help to continue thriving. Thinking that is literally in the face of the very idea that the strongest are fit enough to survive.

TheCyborgNinja posted...

He killed more people than Hitler, but it was a free for all instead of prejudicial, so nobody cares. Irony.

1) Over a much longer period of time, because he really wasn't as bad as hitler (still very evil, just saying not as bad) and was thus tolerated and allowed to stay in power for life. Presumably if hitler was able to reign as long as Stalin did, his death toll would've continued climbing.

2) It was his own people along w/ not targeting any specific group. Which still should have gotten intervention from other countries but is inherently less objectionable than conquering a bunch of other countries and then systematically murdering their people along w/ his own.

3) I'm always dubious of the claim he killed more, anyway. Depends how you assign blame. Considering the nazis were the aggressor towards nearly every country they went to war with, you could quite reasonably blame them for all the war deaths of Britain, France, Russia, etc... on top of the Holocaust. (Poland, the most-screwed over country of WW2, gets its deaths split between Germany and Russia b/c again, Russia were also evil and in cahoots w/ the nazis for a while)

darkknight109 posted...

Maybe because he killed tens of millions of people? For some reason, historians tend to frown on that sort of behaviour.

Zeus posted...

And, while they helped to keep the Nazis occupied, ultimately it was the US-led Allied forces which won the day.

This is a gross misrepresentation of the war. No, the Soviets did not "keep the Nazis occupied" while America saved the day, the Soviets did the majority of the work in actually defeating the Nazis while America showed up late and decided to take all the credit. Consider that the Eastern front - where the USSR fought almost unsupported against Germany and Japan - was larger than all other fronts of the war (Western, Pacific, and African) combined. The Soviets had more casualties in the war than America had troops. Moreover, even after having suffered one of the highest body counts of any nation in the war, the Soviets still had enough gas in the tank afterwards to grow into a global superpower to rival the US in strength. It is not an exaggeration to say that Hitler lost the war as soon as he decided to invade the Soviet Union.

By contrast, the US showed up two years late to the actual conflict (and even then, only after being attacked) and by the time they actually joined the fighting in earnest, battles like Dunkirk and the Battle of Britain had already stalled the Nazi advance to the West, while the ongoing invasion of the USSR was quickly turning into a disaster for Germany in the East. America certainly played a significant role in bringing the war to a close when it did, but by the time they actually entered the war the Axis defeat was already a foregone conclusion.

American history books like to lionize the American contribution, downplay the role of the other Allies, and almost completely excise the significant contributions.of the USSR (due to many of them having been written during the Cold War), but the reality is that while no single Ally is responsible for the victory over the Axis powers, the USSR almost unarguably was the one who was the greatest contributor to the cause.

With two quick notes that Britain wouldn't have been able to halt the nazi advance on the western and African fronts w/o the weapons being sent from the U.S. (but supplying arms is several tiers below actually doing the fighting, of course) and that Russia's "heroics" weren't intentional but a "hoist by his own petard" moment where Stalin had allied w/ hitler out of convenience and was betrayed and caught by surprise.
But yeah, U.S. involvement helped end the war sooner, but Russia was already on a course to eventually defeat them and by far took the brunt of the fighting and casualties (pretty sure they were the country w/ the most losses, and by a staggering amount over the others...though again partly their own fault for the purge Stalin did on his military before the war and simply not even having as many weapons as soldiers).

I'm glad the U.S. did enter the war and help end it sooner. But Russia sacrificed and contributed more than any other country, albeit not by choice.

I'm happy for him. Feels like a waste when older people win. He'll actually be able to use his winnings to live comfortably for decades and enjoy things.

(Yeah, they can pass it on to their offspring, but usually it seems they live long enough to frivolously blow most of it to get the most out of their remaining years)

Krazy_Kirby posted...

did he do like most idiot winners and take the lump sum?

In principle I'd prefer the 20 year pay out based on the financial logic/math.
In reality...your payments cease if you die, and I'd be too damn paranoid about giving powerful groups a large vested interest in my early death.

OhhhJa posted...

streamofthesky posted...

OhhhJa posted...

streamofthesky posted...

OhhhJa posted...

MannerSaurus posted...

but I'm not sure what your angle is here on "easily available gun."

He's one of the leftists here that believes nobody should be allowed to own guns and uses every kind of story like this to push an agenda despite the fact that a gun in the room isn't gonna make most people shoot their mother

Not a leftist, but it's cute you think that. I guess to someone so far off the deep end of the right it would look like I am.

Yeah you're about as much not a leftist as zeus is a left leaning centrist

I voted in the last election for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate and former 2-term Republican governor, because I'm such a raging hippie leftist. You got me! Darn it.

You voted for that idiot? And a libertarian who believes in strict gun control? Does not compute

Hell of a lot smarter than Trump, who you clearly voted for.
And no politician agrees with someone's views 100%, you pick the one who's most agreeable with you. Also I realize "strict" gun control is pretty much impossible in this country so it's not high on my priority list for a candidate's positions.
Same reason I didn't give a shit about Bernie Sanders advocating for free college (which I disagree with). It was never going to get passed by Congress, so his view on it wouldn't have really mattered.

OhhhJa posted...

streamofthesky posted...

OhhhJa posted...

MannerSaurus posted...

but I'm not sure what your angle is here on "easily available gun."

He's one of the leftists here that believes nobody should be allowed to own guns and uses every kind of story like this to push an agenda despite the fact that a gun in the room isn't gonna make most people shoot their mother

Not a leftist, but it's cute you think that. I guess to someone so far off the deep end of the right it would look like I am.

Yeah you're about as much not a leftist as zeus is a left leaning centrist

I voted in the last election for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate and former 2-term Republican governor, because I'm such a raging hippie leftist. You got me! Darn it.

OhhhJa posted...

MannerSaurus posted...

but I'm not sure what your angle is here on "easily available gun."

He's one of the leftists here that believes nobody should be allowed to own guns and uses every kind of story like this to push an agenda despite the fact that a gun in the room isn't gonna make most people shoot their mother

Not a leftist, but it's cute you think that. I guess to someone so far off the deep end of the right it would look like I am.