Lurker > hockeybub89

Same applies to those who actively seek out games with deliberate children to attract horny grown adults. They play games with lolis and panty shots of kids because desire those things.

This is like the go-to reply when people want some sexy women in games. Like it's always blown out of proportion. Most guys and lesbians just want an attractive woman to look at. Doesn't mean we're going to start doing WHIP IT OUT AND GO TO WORK the moment we see some cleavage or panty shots.

Dead Estate for example. It's Binding of Isaac meets Resident Evil. It's a great game and you have this beauty of a shopkeeper to greet you whenever you need to buy something:
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/7/6/4/AAPCn7AAEoVE.jpg
Over the top yes but large breasted women exist. The character designs are even done by a woman. It always brings me a smile when I walk in her shop.

Nothing is wrong with fan service

With a world population nearing 8 billion, the only reason anyone would be lamenting people not having children is because "the right kind" of children aren't being born as often.

There are tons of good male role models, especially for young kids. Like those teachers who set up classes on how to tie a tie, how to act with respect and kindness etc.

Why go towards people like Tate? I think a lot of these lost young men just feel entitled to results and success without putting in any of the work.

Here are some quotes

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/4/9/9/AAKOcSAAEoQ7.png

Man is legit terrible

the people that demand this type of censorship don't even purchase the anyway or consume that type of media anyway so it's always a loss.

I dont use social media, kid lol

So curious, would you be for example be cool with content that sexualizes children?

Ignoring that TC is a troll. As in he has no interest in addressing counter points, just here to push his dramaqueen nonsense.

Ignoring that, censorship in games does not only come in "self" censorship flavor. Which is not a bad thing imo. Because one themselves have chose to do it. Else it's some censoring of self censoring thing.

I'm all for creative freedom.

I had a meal called BulDak that was very spicy but fantastic.

Bibambap and bulgogi are solid staples.

Twitter can't crash into the ground fast enough >_>

*Arrow goes right through head*
30 seconds later: "Must have been the wind".

Let's embrace our girliness together

The gameplay to cutscene ratio is atrocious in those games too.

It's wild that people are still against social media in 2023

You're right, Chamberlain wasn't American, which makes bringing him up in the first place while discussing American geopolitics even stupider. Thanks for reinforcing my point.

I wasn't against pulling out of Afghanistan, I was pointing out that democrats are following a similar, but somewhat different, script to republicans. Not surprised you wouldn't understand this basic point. It's no wonder you think I'm being paid by Putin. You know, me, the same guy who wrote "May he get blown apart when Ukraine rolls in on Moscow, I don't really give a shit about him." earlier in the topic. Please think before posting.

This motherfucker needs to be recalled!

He's not fit to run a lemonade stand much less a state.

Well if we're going to judge dogs by what they could potentially do then there are dozens of breeds that are larger and far more powerful than Pit Bulls, and most of them are traditional guardian breeds with human aggression bred in. It's just that people don't own those breeds as much as Pits so they're nowhere near as numerous. Any dog over a certain size has the capacity to do damage, everybody may as well have Pugs if we're worried about potential here. The first face transplant was the result of a Lab attack.